~Cute. ~Oh please, I didn't "run" with anything. Again, those of us who are in support of Avatarland never questioned the merits of the film -- this was brought to the table by the opposition, once we successfully refuted the false allegations regarding the film -- now, the opposition wants to say the film doesn't matter, well sure -- we already know that. But, since it was brought to the table repeatedly, we had to break it down to reveal the truth. It goes without saying that the licensing of merchandise has minimal impact on how successful an attraction can be. I don't have any stats on Avatar but I do know Avatar sold 19.7 million dvd/blu ray, which is roughly half of their 40 million facebook fans.
~You don't need "broad cultural impact" to define a theme park experience or to create & build a new immersive attraction(s) -- it's not a prerequisite. By this logic, we wouldn't have many amusement parks or attractions -- would we??? The New Fantasyland is a prime example of great classic quintessential Disney -- this is what everyone here raved about nonstop, but in reality -- the reviews have been lukewarm & underwhelmed, it's not a runaway success by any stretch of the imagination.
Anyway, the film has NEVER been our argument, not ever. We don't care -- it's the budget, creativity, innovation and attention to detail that matter. It's more than okay to bash Avatar, that's fine. You'll run into trouble once you start to justify why it shouldn't be built, that's simply a matter of opinion, one that is also subject to change. I'm am really excited and can't wait for more details on Avatarland, when people bash and say they hate it, I get more excited & love the idea even more, lol!