I've gotta think it would be better and cheaper for Disney just to pay 100 million to Bruckheimer and Depp not to make another mess of a movie and spend the other 400 million on something better.
So if they make a POTC 4 Will and Elizibeth will not be in it? did i get that right
The speculation I have heard is that Johnny Depp and producer Jerry Bruckheimer would be interested in doing a POTC 4.
Some of the speculation talks about Bloom and Knightley no longer being a part of the franchise and they will start a new trilogy with POTC 4, introducing new characters. Barbosa and his crew and Captain Jack and his crew will stay in tact but the main supporting roles will be played by different people and introduce new characters into the franchise.
Also, because of the reference to the "Fountain of Youth" at the end of POTC 3, many people speculate that the 4th POTC will start with that adventure. Others disagree and say that the reference to the "Fountain of Youth" being in Florida is just a shout out to Disney. When they are looking at the Florida map at the end of POTC 3 for the Fountain of Youth, it appears that the 'X' that marks the spot is right on Orlando. Meaning that the "fountain of youth" for everyone is WDW.
Just some very broad speculation here with nothing to back it up.
Well, why don't you enlighten us all instead of being so condescending...Are you saying that POTC 3 will not make money?
Make Money or make profit?
Of course it will make money. In order to be profitable for Disney though, the whole shebang would need to pull in north of $1billion. They need to pull in $500 million to cover production and marketing and that doesn't include the cut the movie theaters get, the cut Bruckheimer takes and the cut Depp takes. Disney gets less then 50 cents on the dollar for these movies.
Also, the interview with the writers on Boxofficemojo said that there may be a 4th, but it's not for sure. Between the costs of this one and the 63ish% week to week drop off in their box office take, I'd have to say that no, they won't make more.
The $1 billion figure he is talking about is not the movie's cost, but the project worldwide box office it will need just to break-even. And that's a very favorable number. Because of the extensive revenue participation involved, the money will likely need to do much more than that before The Walt Disney Company recoups their investment.Where do you get the number of over 1 billion dollars for total movie cost?
Where do you get the number of over 1 billion dollars for total movie cost? I realize that the movie cost over 200m to make but another 800 million dollars in cost seems excessive. In addition, the movie will not see a week-to-week dropoff of 63%. That is the dropoff from the premier week to this week but the next really big, anticipated movie to come out will be Transformers on July 4th. I think POTC 3 will continue to pull in decent numbers until then.
POTC 3 has made over 600 million worldwide in 2 weeks of release which does not include merchandising or DVD PPV sales.
The only reason I could see them not making a 4th would be if somehow Johnny Depp did not want to make another one. I think this is a financially lucrative film for Disney.
The $1 billion figure he is talking about is not the movie's cost, but the project worldwide box office it will need just to break-even. And that's a very favorable number. Because of the extensive revenue participation involved, the money will likely need to do much more than that before The Walt Disney Company recoups their investment.
A movie's box office has now become a major part of the movie's marketing campaign. That means reality gets obscured (if not down right fabricated) in order serve the hype. Anytime a studio tells you they're going to make tons of money off a movie, treat it like they're talking about "true, deep, passionate" love that binds Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes in pure honest matrimony for evermore (Californias 10 year community property law or the triumphal return of Xenu not withstanding).
And yes - a 63% drop-off from the first "big week" box office is a flat out disaster for a movie this size. Ask all those people at Columbia who will pack up their offices later thanks to Spider-man 3. The internal numbers for At World's End are horrible even from the first weekend. The trend is consistent with what marketing is seeing - people went to this one because of the goodwill from the very first movie, but no one really likes AWE and they're not telling their friends and neighbors to go see it. It's also not bringing in repeat business nor has it re-captured the interest of a huge chuck of the audience that was turned off by Dead Man's Chest.
Yes, I know that you've see the movie eight times and the Aunt Tilly is rounding up the entire bridge club - but if you're on this board it automatically means you're not part of the general audience. You already have a strong bias for Disney; that's not the case with 99.9% of everyone else in the country who just see Pirates as another summer blockbuster.
Disney is, after all, a business - there are many times more "normal" people that they have to please than rabid fans to call any movie a "success".
Plans for Pirate 4 have, Im sure, been cancelled the moment Bob Iger could fumble for his cell phone. There is no way Disney is going to drop the estimated $600-$700 million on a franchise that people are done with. At the same time, the failure of At Worlds End will also put pressure on Disney to come up with some other ways to leverage the franchise theyve sunk far too much money into the series now just to drop it.
Whether well see cheaper sequels, a television series (unlikely, apparently Bruckheimer has already shot down Disneys proposal), direct-to-DVD flicks or whatever whatever youll see is going to be dirt cheap to make.
So, where are the facts to support any of this?