Disneyland vs. Disney World

[Sterm26]

I"m not sure that this is a true "trip report"...it's really my personal comparison of the 2 American Disney theme parks. I'm fortunate enough to have visited both of them in the same calendar year, and I want to give my observations on the differences and similarities.

I guess you can call me a Disney World vet...I've been to WDW 8 times since 1979, including 2 trips 18 months apart between 11/03 and 02/05. I know that may seem paltry compared to many regulars on these forums, but still.....it's more than many of my friends have gone! :cool1:

Anyway, I talked my family into going to Southern California and Disneyland this past August. My wife and 6 year old daughter have never been to California, and I figured we could get our Disney fix at DL while seeing some new sights. (And you couldn't beat the airfare I got :teeth: )

I'd been to California 3 times before, all before 1990, and really didn't remember much about it. In fact, my only prior visit to DL was a disaster...a Saturday in the Summer, very crowded and hot. My dad and I left after about 3 hours, wishing we were in Orlando. Now, I wanted to give the place a second chance, especially during it's 50th anniversary year.

Things I loved about Disneyland:

Walt actually walked, slept, and lived here. The Tiki Room is NOT under new management (No Gilbert Gottfried screaming at me for 15 minutes). The new Space Mountain is incredible. Indiana Jones and Roger Rabbit. Mickey climbing the Matterhorn. Fantasmic is actually on the Rivers of America. Buzz Lightyear's Astro Blaster is an improvement over WDW's already excellent ride. Alice in Wonderland's Caterpillar cars. Main St. still has the Penny Arcade. The Blue Bayou restaurant is actually INSIDE the Pirates of the Carribean ride. The spectacular facade of "It's a Small World". The 50th anniversary parade and the wonderful fireworks show. Churros. Short walk to Downtown Disney and it's excellent restaurants. Walking distance to many hotels.

Things I didn't like:

The fact that the Matterhorn, Space Mountain, and the Monorail are visible from the freeway and bustling city streets. WDW lets the anticipation build as you get closer. (Not anyone's fault...Walt made sure to buy enough land in FL.) Lack of shade. CM's in DL aren't quite as jovial as their counterparts in WDW (personal observation...never heard "Have a magical day!" while in DL). Tomorrowland seems to have been patched together randomly...and what is that thing with the spinning satellite dishes? The monorail goes right over the gutted Submarine Lagoon...not very attractive.
The Matterhorn, quite frankly, is a disappointment...very bumpy. Redd Rocket's Pizza Port...all I can say is, ugh. California Adventure...ok park (how can you go wrong with the TOT and Soarin'?), but the Paradise Pier is exactly what Walt DIDN'T want when DL was constructed..a cheap amusement pier that could be found at any beach town. Also, why is there a fake Hollywood Boulevard about 30 miles from the real one?

Overall, I did enjoy my time at Disneyland and Southern California. I'm wondering if any of you who live in SoCal, and have been to DL many times and maybe WDW once feel the opposite way. I plan to return to DL in the future, but I'll be hitting Orlando again next year!

Thanks for reading this!

Sterm :earsboy:

[Amy&Dan]

First of all, glad your recent trip was more successful than the last one. This subject has been debated many times. The general consensus seems to be that most folks prefer their home park. I live in Colorado and visit them both regularly but have a soft spot for Disneyland. It feels much more charming and as you say, its Walt's park, you can't beat that for a pixie dust feeling! It is a shame it isn't more removed from a big city but once I walk through that main entrance I might as well be a million miles from anything. I do miss all the wonderful onsite choices WDW has and their many price ranges.

The Matterhorn is bumpy but when you consider the age of that ride its pretty amazing. Not many parks still have rides that pack them in after 40 plus years. Space Mountain at WDW feels exactly the same in my book and after riding Disneyland's Space Mountain too many times to count two weeks ago, I doubt we'll waste our time with WDW's counterpart. As for DCA many people comment that Walt wouldn't like the Paradise Pier area. Probably a lot of truth in that. But I still enjoy the park. Its like the proverbial frosting on the cake. Would I fly two hours just to go to DCA? No. I also wouldn't fly 20 minutes just to visit MGM Studios which is my least favorite Disney theme park. But I would never not visit there while at WDW and enjoy my time there a lot. I just don't feel it has as much to offer as the other parks in WDW except for Fantasmic. The beauty of DCA is that it is right there. Its meant to be enjoyed like you do a condiment, with something else and not necessarily by itself!

I am glad you enjoyed your time at Disneyland. I really feel like I love both DL and WDW equally and spend a lot of time at each. We never miss one when we are at the other and just enjoy our time wherever we are lucky enough to be. DH and I are just keeping our fingers crossed that DVC really does put something at Disneyland, that would make things easier for us due to the lack of onsite choices. One more note I had to laugh at your Redd Rocket's comment! Again, its what your used to I guess because I think every bite of pizza I have had (don't even try anymore) at WDW tastes like the way sweaty gym socks smell!

[Sterm26]

Oh, I'm not saying that the pizza at WDW is any better! The pizza at the Pop Century food court at WDW is downright vile! Of course, I am a bit biased, here in South Philly we have dozens of mom-and-pop pizza places that blow away any chain pizza. I do think that the restaurants at DL are better, on average, than the ones at WDW's Magic Kingdom (but you can't beat Epcot's international dining).

As for Space Mountain, I would be willing to put up with a 2 year rehab of WDW's version if it turns out to be like DL's.

Also, the Matterhorn is a very cool park icon, and I do respect it's history as one of the first steel roller coasters. I think it can do with an upgrade, however.



:teeth:

[CalGal]

While I share your oppinion on many things, I differ on a few. I love seeing the Matterhorn from the freeway. As I child, the anticipation of seeing the Matterhorn from I5 added to my excitement. It still does. And while there was a time that I thought it was too bumpy, I love the ride. I got used to the roughness I guess.

I thought it was funny that you yearned for Orlando after a hot summer Saturday years ago. I last visited WDW in August 2003 - whew! I thought the crowds were heavier than at DL , and the the heat was so intense -- at 9:00 in the morning! Thanks God for all the shade and airconditioned shops!
(More shade at DL would be welcomed though, particularly at DCA and the transportation area)

One of the things I love about DLR and WDW is that they are very different. I love that WDW is spread over many square miles, and that you can be fully entertained for 1-2 weeks without ever leaving the World. But I also love that DL is so compact, and that once at DL, it's possible to spend 5 days emersed in Disney without every getting into a car, or bus. And I love that 5 days is much more affordable than 2 weeks both in time and money.

[tinknsnow]

I'm a WDW vet about to venture across the country into the original Disney park and I can't wait! Thanks for the trip report and comparison. I am really looking forward to trying all the attractions that WDW does not have-- esp. the bumpy Matterhorn because it's a classic-- and it is going to be great to see Mr. Toad again after all these years!

I never eat pizza at WDW and don't plan on it at DL either. But I am excited to try Blue Bayou and In and Out Burger when we're out of the park. :teeth:

[puggymom]

WDW Vet here and comparing DL to MK, DL wins hands down for me. I am so glad I made the trip this year. What I do like better at MK, the Castle and Splash Mountain. I just loved DL, the quaint feeling you get walking around, I loved NO square. Space Mountain rocks, I can only hope WDW will one day do the same rehab. I loved the Matterhorn, the history, it is still a great ride. And most important DL has MR TOAD!!!!!!!!!

[lark]

In many ways, I think it's about expectations. I'd been to WDW also a number of times before going to disneyland. I had very low expectations for DL. I'm not sure why, but I think alot of it had to do with the fact that I rely heavily on the unofficial guide for WDW, and the introduction makes it sound as though DL is basically a couple of parks wedged into a parking lot in southern california.

When we finally went to DL for the first time last year, I was blown away. It's a different kind of thing, for sure, but still great in its own way. If you need a week-long, never leave the park, all enveloping experience, you need to go to Florida. But DL has an awful lot to commend it. I really like the MK, but in the final analysis think DL is better. More quaint or something. Can't explain it. Outside the gates, I'd rather be at WDW, but once you're in, it's hard to beat disneyland.

I also did not expect as much from the disneyland hotels as you get at the WDW hotels, but was really surprised. The views aren't as nice, but they work just as hard on the "magic."

[Tink&SquirtsMom]

Thanks for you comparison. Its so interesting to read everyones different views. Its so funny that two parks can be so similiar yet so vastly different. We've been forunate enough to go to WDW and DL in the same year now too (and just 60 days out from our next DL trip). I agree with what another poster said about favoring your home park. I've been to DL more times then I can count and this summer was my first trip to WDW (we had 10 days at the parks and then did a Disney Cruise). For us a WDW vacation and a DL vacation are almost like two different trips. I know DL like the back of my hand and never plan anything (except maybe a Blue Bayou ps). Its very spontaneous and go with the flow, wandering between both parks with very little planning (and very little waiting since we know them well enough to know when to go and what to ride when). WDW seemed to require so much planning just because everything is so spread out, and you want to make sure to pack it all in, not to mention we didn't know where anything was. We also had certain PS's we wanted to get which meant knowing 90 days out knowing which park we would be at on which day. We didn't wait in to many lines at WDW still thanks to Tour Guide Mike. But we didn't like the busses to each park when we were used to walking between them, and the summer heat there is a million times worse then here. When we go to DL we tend to park the car once and and not move it till we leave, just walking everywhere. But theres only so much you can do, so we only go 3 days at a time usually. I loved that you could go to WDW and not leave and it could keep you busy for 10 days and still leave you with things you hadn't gotten to do, but at the same time, I'm glad I live closer to DL so I can just take my 3 day trips a couple times a year and feel I've done it all and gotten my Disney fix while still having vacation money and time left over for new adventures in other non-Disney (gasp!) places. We did feel like even though WDW has so many more parks, and CA was a dumb idea for a theme park IN CA, we still have the best of each of all the WDW parks here at Cal Adventure (AKL's ITTBAB, Epcot's Turtle Talk and Soarin, MGM Star Tours and TOT). Also Magic Kingdom wasn't "home" to me the way Disneyland is. It seemed huge but with less to do and less theming?? I agree that somehow DL is more charming or quaint then MK but can't put my finger on why either. I do know I really missed New Orleans Square in MK. From WDW, I will miss walking Epcot World Showcase at night time, and Mickey's Philharmagic (my favorite attraction!!). I will definitely visit WDW again but its Disneyland for us.

[bubba73]

OK My turn. I have been to WDW over 20 times including twice less than a year apart. Plus, I just got back from my first trip to DL. I'm not going to lie. I enjoyed DL but it isn't DW. There are some distinct advantages to going to DL. Such as The Matterhorn, SM, Buzz Lightyear, and Mr. Toad. But there are downsides such as a very small Castle and Monorail and not near as many attractions. Just don't get to do as much at DL.

Other opinions are: reminded me of Universal in Orlando. Parked in a parking deck, take a tram to the DTD area, buy a ticket, and then turn either to the right or the left to decide which park to go to. Just like US and City Walk. Also, maybe I was just in there on a good day but the crowds were not bad at all but what I saw was dressed more appropriate than what I see all the time at WDW. In Orlando, a lot of the guests will come in wearing bikini tops and mini skirts. (While I am a guy and that doesn't bother me one bit, I still don't think it is appropriate attire for a family park.) I also saw a kid doing his homework inside the park. Maybe I am a little crazy but if the kid has that much homework, stay at home.

Just my opinion.

[LoriMistress]

I completely agree with everything you wrote. Though, I do like The Matterhorn, I don't remember it being as bumpy. They need to refurbish The Matterhorn, immediately. Though, the one thing that I did enjoy about DL is the fact that characters are not so restricted in just posing for pictures or signing an autograph book. They actually INTERACT with everyone. And I thought DCA was completely lame.

[Sterm26]

A friend of mine just got back from Orlando and is heading out to DL next May. I highly recommended it to him, just in case some of you think I'm unfairly trashing the place.... :earboy2:

[lap3]

While I share your oppinion on many things, I differ on a few. I love seeing the Matterhorn from the freeway. As I child, the anticipation of seeing the Matterhorn from I5 added to my excitement. It still does.

That's a very good and valid point. I got the same feeling once I saw the matterhorn. It's funny because my kids get the same way, too! Of course, who wouldn't?

Anyways, glad to hear that you had a great time this trip. Our family took our first trip to WDW this year and while we had a great time, there were things that we didn't like. For example, It's A Small World seemed like a ride that was an afterthought. We literally walked by it and didn't know it! Another one was on POTC, we were expecting a big 2nd drop like at DL but it never came!

It's hard not to draw comparisons between both parks because they have so many similarities and differences. For future trips to DL or WDW, we'll just try to have a good time. But I know that won't be too hard! :rolleyes1

[atakaratemom]

[QUOTE=CalGal]While I share your oppinion on many things, I differ on a few. I love seeing the Matterhorn from the freeway. As I child, the anticipation of seeing the Matterhorn from I5 added to my excitement. It still does.]


As a life long So. Cal resident I have to agree. As we got closer to Anaheim my family would have a contest to see who could spot the Matterhorn first. When we drove away at night, I would look back and see it lighted up and it would give me such a secure feeling knowing that even though our day at the park was over, the Matterhorn would still be waiting there when we came back.

[Amy&Dan]

A friend of mine just got back from Orlando and is heading out to DL next May. I highly recommended it to him, just in case some of you think I'm unfairly trashing the place.... :earboy2:

I don't think anybody thinks your trashing the place, we just LOVE the place! Also, if I had a dime for everytime a WDW lover came over this this side of disboards and was less than enthusiastic about Disneyland, I'd be able to buy a lot of Mickey Bars! Although I must say, since Disneyland got spruced up for the 50th, the comments have been mostly positive.

[Sterm26]

As someone said before, it probably all depends on your "home" park.

I went to WDW 5 times before I made it to DL. I still remember my first trip, my dad driving, following the signs, parking lot...where the heck was the park? Everything was slowly revealed...the monorail track, the Contemporary, 7 Seas Lagoon...and finally, glimmering on the other side of the lake, Cinderella's Castle and Space Mountain! I made sure that my daughter had the same experience the first time we took her a couple years ago.

In my opinion, Walt would have wanted the same thing for Disneyland, unfortunately he just couldn't buy enough land. But that's just me.

That said, the other WDW parks, at least Epcot and MGM, are visible from the nearby roadways, and that doesn't detract from my enjoyment at those places. Maybe it's just an MK thing with me!

I did love DL and do plan to return, but WDW is my home base.

[tlynk]

I enjoyed your trip report- thanks :) . I like your comparisons. I love WDW- there is so much to do and Epcot is my favorite! However, DL has so much history and character. When I visit WDW with my family- we usually only spend an hour or two at the Magic Kingdom. It just isn't the same :earsboy:, but then I grew up going to Disneyland- I guess that makes a difference. :goodvibes

[DisneyDotty]

I very much enjoyed your comparison--have been to WDW 10plus times, and am planning first DL trip for December. I'm wondering--those who have been to both parks--are there any planning strategies for WDW that also apply to DL? (ie, are ps's a must, any days to avoid DL, etc?) I eagerly look forward to any tips for DL that you would like to provide! :flower:

[CALNEVA DISNEYFANS]

Well I do need to comment on this thread...

We live in N. California, and we love both DL and WDW. We are leaving (Oct. 28th) for our 3rd trip to WDW in 4 yrs! We have been to DL more times than WDW.

Disneyland just seems so OriGINAL. Pirates of C is better, Blue Bayou in the same building as the ride, CLUB 33, Indiana Jones... Matterhorn. The park is so compact (which may be a negative as the park continues to grow). Truly one of a kind! No crummy buses to take to the different parks. California Adventure, while no favorite park of mine, reminds me of MGM and Epcott combined into one.

With that said, we LoVE WDW - Disneyland set on a lake, spread out, like someone else said... what Walt would have done if he had the money to buy enough land. Four Parks... WOW. And now... WDW is going to have its own version of the Matterhorn!

DL has WDW beat when it comes to ORIGINALITY and convenience. However, WDW has DL beat when it comes to quantity... Disney, Disney, Disney. WE LOVE them both for the different experiences they give.

Any true DISNEY freak has to go to the ORigINAL at least once.


P.S. If you go to Disneyland use RIDEMAX what a great program!

[tlynk]

Well I do need to comment on this thread...

We live in N. California, and we love both DL and WDW. We are leaving (Oct. 28th) for our 3rd trip to WDW in 4 yrs! We have been to DL more times than WDW.

Disneyland just seems so OriGINAL. Pirates of C is better, Blue Bayou in the same building as the ride, CLUB 33, Indiana Jones... Matterhorn. The park is so compact (which may be a negative as the park continues to grow). Truly one of a kind! No crummy buses to take to the different parks. California Adventure, while no favorite park of mine, reminds me of MGM and Epcott combined into one.

With that said, we LoVE WDW - Disneyland set on a lake, spread out, like someone else said... what Walt would have done if he had the money to buy enough land. Four Parks... WOW. And now... WDW is going to have its own version of the Matterhorn!

DL has WDW beat when it comes to ORIGINALITY and convenience. However, WDW has DL beat when it comes to quantity... Disney, Disney, Disney. WE LOVE them both for the different experiences they give.

Any true DISNEY freak has to go to the ORigINAL at least once.


P.S. If you go to Disneyland use RIDEMAX what a great program!

I agree with you 100%, but I'm curious about RIDEMAX?? I've never heard of it before??? Unless its a name for the Fast passes?? :confused3

[CALNEVA DISNEYFANS]

Ridemax is a computer program that gives you the best usage of your time spent at the park. www.ridemax.com

[GrumpyCAdad]

Having been to both within the last year, I can say my wife and I both enjoy DL better. I like how close everything is ar DL. You can stay onsite and not have to worry about transportation at all.

Plus, DL has so much more history. You can walk down Main St. and know Walt walked down that very same street years before.

Don't get me wrong, we both liked WDW, and are planning a return trip in 07. It was just hard with 3 small kids, lugging a stroller on the bus/boat/monorail everywhere we went.

[Sterm26]

The conventional wisdom, when I was out there, was...DO NOT GO TO DISNEYLAND ON A SATURDAY!!!!!

We went from Sunday thru Friday, late August, and only Sunday was really crowded.

[SeattleRedBear]

I'm wondering--those who have been to both parks--are there any planning strategies for WDW that also apply to DL? (ie, are ps's a must, any days to avoid DL, etc?) I eagerly look forward to any tips for DL that you would like to provide!
I think attendance at WDW is driven more by out of town visitors while attendance at DL is driven more by locals (especially off-season). Even off-season, weekends at DL can be pretty crowded, so even more so than WDW, showing up early is a good idea (esp. on the weekend). Because DL is more compact (with narrower walkways) it feels more crowded, even if attendance is that same as MK. However, DL mid-week is much quieter than WDW mid-week. If vacation is over a weekend, I will probably reserve Saturday/Sunday for DCA (maybe heading over to DL for fireworks and fantasmic in the evening). PS's are much less important as there are fewer opportunities for eating on-site and so many more for eating off-site. The exceptions would be character meals, fantasmic dessert buffet & BB, maybe RFC & Napa Rose. Fantasmic dessert buffet only seats 20 on the balcony, so those go very quickly. Personally, when I do Fantasmic, it will only be from the balcony. DL has also added a dessert seating option closer to the water, but the view isn't as good and I don't think it's a buffet.

Another thing quite different are the hotels. While at WDW you have quite a range of on-site hotels (which offer the benefits of staying on-site) at DL there are only three (in price range from moderately expensive to really expensive, although occasionally a promotion like the current 4 nights for the cost of 3 makes it a little more reasonable). In my opinion, if you're a park visitor who wants to go back every afternoon for a nap and a swim, maybe only go to a park for 1/2 day and spend more time shopping, relaxing, hanging out, dining, then you should consider a DL hotel. But if you're a park commando who basically plans on sleeping in the room and that's about it, then there's a wide range of more affordable, convenient hotels that are walking distance or short shuttle ride to the parks. Unfortunately, at DL you will *never* have that feeling of being completely away from the rest of the world so why pay the money for an on-site hotel.

[DisneyDotty]

Thanks Sterm and Seattle! Our travel plans have us arriving at the DL area on a Saturday, and we're staying 5 nights. This is right before Christmas. Would you advise us booking a tour for our Saturday arrival at DL, thus at least allowing us some attractions without a crowd hassle? I would like to hit either DL or DCA the day we arrive. What would you recommend?

[Albertan mom]

I was so happy to find this thread!! After weeks and weeks of conteplating...we are thinking of going back to Disneyland. We finally came to that conclusion a few minutes ago, and then I saw this thread and you all confirmed what I wanted to hear!!

We went in May '04. There were a few things closed when we were there-Alice in Wonderland, Space Mountain, Peters Pans Flight. And I never got to go on Indiana Jones, the Haunted House, TOT, California Screamin--so want to do that this time! (son was too short-now I have no excuses-he is tall enough!)

I also think that with us going in December, it will be totally different with all the Christmas decor up and stuff. Excited to see how beautiful it will be!

Plus we will stay at a different hotel, maybe on site this time.

Thanks again!!

[Sterm26]

If I had to choose between the 2 parks (DL or DCA), on a Saturday, I'd go to DCA. In contrast to DL, DCA never was crowded at all during my stay, even on weekend days.

But remember, the Saturday I was in Anaheim, my family and I did an LA/Hollywood driving tour. If you are planning something along those lines, Saturday worked pretty well for us.

If you mean to do a DL park tour, I would say that would be a good way to get around the crowd issue, at least somewhat. I imagine that you'd have to call and book the tour ASAP.

[mtb2005]

This might be off topic but you guys were talking about weekends so do you think the last weekend of january would be crowded.

[Sterm26]

The people I talked to when I was in DL (locals, mostly) agree that weekends are crowded year-round. Your best hope, believe it or not, is to hope for a spot of rain...the locals stay home!

Or so I've been told :earseek:

[joshua121301]

The people I talked to when I was in DL (locals, mostly) agree that weekends are crowded year-round. Your best hope, believe it or not, is to hope for a spot of rain...the locals stay home!

Or so I've been told :earseek:
True weekends are crowded,,Sunday afternoon really lightens up however. It rained last Sunday and we went. It's the cold that keeps us away, anything under 60. We average 45 visits a year and love our park, but love WDW as well. Two different experiences for us, WDW is a vacation, DL is just another day at the park.

[DeanDoug]

I also have been to both DL and WDW this year...
We are DVC members, and enjoy WDW a great deal... but I was in California so I jumped to DL for a quick afternoon visit.

I was impressed with DL... I thought the CMs were almost WDW caliber. I was amazed that I liked DL so much... gasp, even better than the MK? It is compact and very easy to navigate... and VERY Disney.

Florida is closer for us... but I'll definately be returning to DL with my wife and kids! :Pinkbounc

[kella]

We're planning our first trip to DL in either April or May of 06 and after reading all of your posts, my excitement is way over the top!!! We have been to WDW 3 times and love it, but just looking at the size difference I know DL will not be the same. Can't wait to post after our trip and I'm sure I'll be all over this board gathering tips for our first visit to DL!!!!!

:Pinkbounc :Pinkbounc :Pinkbounc

[AnaheimGirl]

Hi,

I just came over to this board after living on the WDW boards for the past few months. But I grew up in So. Cal, have been to DL countless times, and have been to WDW four times. I don't think I can say which I like better. To me, they are just different. I like WDW better for a week-long, nothing but Disney vacation, but for a day in a theme park (or two), I like DL better.

I'm always amused at some of the things people say they don't like about DL, because those are usually the things I don't like about WDW, in the reverse. (Not flaming, just saying it's funny -- I think it's the "home park" thing.)

For example, you said you didn't like that some attractions are visible from the street, and that by not being this way "WDW lets the anticipation build as you get closer". I love catching that first glimpse of the Matterhorn as we drive up to DL. The excitement rushes through me as we pull into the parking lot, and there is plenty of time for anticipation to build as we park, make our way to the entrance, etc. AT WDW, I always feel like it takes so long to get there. I think, "OK, we've entered Disney property, but where is everything?" For me, it's anticlimactic, and it's one of the things I like less in WDW. It goes along with the whole size thing, though. Lots of "WDW people" (for lack of a better term, lol) say how they don't like that DL is so much smaller, but again, that's one of the things I prefer about DL. At either location, one park may not be as appealing to some families. At WDW, it's much harder to say, head to MGM just to ride ToT and RnRC, then head back to another park. At DL, it's easy to skip over to CA, ride ToT, Screamin', Soarin' and Grizzly River, then head back to DL.

I never noticed a lack of shade at DL, but since the heat and humidity aren't as intense in California, I've never felt a need for shade the way I do in WDW. Also, I've never had a CM tell me to have a magical day at WDW, either, so CM friendliness is not something I've noticed any difference in.

I agree that the Pier area of CA isn't so great, but it's just like Dinoland in WDW's AK. Not Disney's best, but not a reason to discredit an entire park, especially when that park has some other great attractions. As a family of thrill ride junkies, we actually enjoy day at CA much more than we enjoy at day at AK, Epcot or MGM.

The Matterhorn, yes, is probably disappointing by today's roller coaster standards. But as someone pointed out, it's pretty old, and was quite exciting back when it was built. As much as I think it needs a revamp, I'll be very sad if they change it much, I have such great memories of it -- my first "coaster" type ride and how exciting (and scary!) it seemed for a little girl back in the late 60's/early 70's.

Anyway, just wanted to add my comments as someone who spent a lot of time at DL before ever going to WDW, and let you know that you were right about some of us, at least, feeling the opposite as you do.

[Ella1]

After reading all of your views on both DL and WDW, I just thought I would add my little "bit".
I'm in England and so the first park I visited was Disneyland Paris, which we really enjoyed, though it was very, very expensive. This was around 1997-1998.
In 2002 we had our first visit to Disneyland California, we had a 4 day pass and loved every moment of it, but due to the long flight (11.5 hours) and the cost, we never thought we would be back.....till.....
Last year we were in Anaheim for 4 weeks and we had Deluxe AP's so we spent an awful lot of time in both parks and at Downtown Disney and we didn't want to go home.
This year we decided to visit Orlando as my daughter wanted to swim with dolphins at Discovery Cove. So we had 2 weeks at WDW which we enjoyed and we even got to visit Celebration which is a beautiful little place.
Out of the 3 parks the worst one was Paris, too expensive and we never saw any characters apart from Mickey and Minnie driving past in a car. The CM's were quite friendly, but also quite rude.
WDW was very nice but we didn't like all the storms ( nobody told us it was rainy season till after we had booked) and getting wet all the time. The rides were good and there was a lot to do in 2 weeks, we didn't get to do it all. The CM's were friendly but we also got the impression that some of them were there just for the money and put no effort into anything.As a non driver (not that I didn't want to drive...I can't drive) we found the transport to be a big problem and everything is so spread out.The buses picked up at 8am. 9am amd 10am and that was it(we were not onsite).
Disneyland California is "home" to us, we can walk to the parks if we want to or the bus picks up at the hotel every half hour throughout the day and night meaning we could spend the day by the pool or shopping and go down in the evening.
We love the rides especially Indiana Jones and TOT is much better than at WDW.
I like the bit about about looking for The matterhorn on the drive to the park, reminded me of being a child and looking for Blackpool Tower when we were being taken to the seaside for the day, the first one to spot it got a penny!!!...lol.
The problem now is that we feel the need to go back to California again next year as we missed it this year, but the probem is the money, it costs a fortune to get over there, but then its not as expensive once we are over there, things are about half of what they are over here, thats another reason to visit again.
Love Ella

[pmcpmc]

:sunny:

[sters]

Oh, I'm not saying that the pizza at WDW is any better! The pizza at the Pop Century food court at WDW is downright vile! Of course, I am a bit biased, here in South Philly we have dozens of mom-and-pop pizza places that blow away any chain pizza. I do think that the restaurants at DL are better, on average, than the ones at WDW's Magic Kingdom (but you can't beat Epcot's international dining).



:teeth:

Guess you havent' eaten lunch at Liberty Tree Tavern! But then again, I haven't eaten at Blue Bayou.

[lucincia]

Just got back from WDW trip. Going to DL in March 2006. Can't wait for our own personal comparison! :)

[Danthesand]

Guess you havent' eaten lunch at Liberty Tree Tavern! But then again, I haven't eaten at Blue Bayou.

I've eaten dinner at both, which including being seated in the absolute middle of the waterfront tables at the Blue Bayou.

http://www.wdwinfo.com/disneyland/photos/MK_no_bb_250.jpg

Yes, while a little too dark (hard to read the menu) and with tables crammed a little too closely together, it was still nice ....and was the only meal we experienced over the course of four days at DL that I would descibe as even approaching decent table service.

On the other hand, the Liberty Tree at WDW is a cute but not particularly special experience (at least to those who have eaten in real historic inns in New England or the Mid Atlantic). The pre-fix meal (I don't know what the people below are supposedly looking at, the place doesn't have menus) is solid but slightly bland, and without the characters the restaurant probably wouldn't get anything near the business it does.

http://www.majesticusa.com/imagen/foto_park_magickingdom_res3.gif

However, the Liberty Tree sits in a resort full of scores of sit-down dining options, running from good (well, a few are less than that -- Tony's Town Square and the Mexican restaurant in Epcot immediately come to mind -- but most start at "good") to excellent.

Or stated differently, just given the difference in number and range of options, WDW pretty much blows DL away when it comes to those looking for really good dining.

[tink4ever]

My DH and I are DVC members and we absolutely adore WDW. I would live on Main St if they let me. We Took our kids DD-17, DS-16, DS-12, DDfriend-18, DSfriend16, to Disneyland last April. We Stayed at GC and we had a wonderful time. Everyone was very friendly, the weather was wonderful and the hotel is beautiful. It reminds me of my home dvc the WL so I felt so at home. Everyday we walked to DD which was right outside our hotel room and would chose which park to start with. The crowds were a little rough at times but being within walking distance to our hotel was a lot easier than WDW and having to find our bus, wait, and then ride to our hotel. Don't get me wrong I love WDW but that part was really enjoyable. Mr. Toad's wild ride was really a blast too because that was our favorite ride before they replaced it with pooh. We ate at the blue bayou in PoC and it was a lot of fun. Fantasmic is more enjoyable in MGM because you are able to sit and relax instead of standing in DL. Oh and I love Ferris Wheels but I went on the large Sun Ferris Wheel with my youngest in DCA and I though I was not going to make it without getting sick. :guilty: My advice is if you get motion sick then don't go in the swing car go in one that stays still. Anyway I definately would encourage everyone to go to DL because like everyone said it is so neat to know that that is where Walts dream started.

[CALNEVA DISNEYFANS]

Well I do need to comment on this thread...

We live in N. California, and we love both DL and WDW. We are leaving (Oct. 28th) for our 3rd trip to WDW in 4 yrs! We have been to DL more times than WDW.

Disneyland just seems so OriGINAL. Pirates of C is better, Blue Bayou in the same building as the ride, CLUB 33, Indiana Jones... Matterhorn. The park is so compact (which may be a negative as the park continues to grow). Truly one of a kind! No crummy buses to take to the different parks. California Adventure, while no favorite park of mine, reminds me of MGM and Epcott combined into one.

With that said, we LoVE WDW - Disneyland set on a lake, spread out, like someone else said... what Walt would have done if he had the money to buy enough land. Four Parks... WOW. And now... WDW is going to have its own version of the Matterhorn!

DL has WDW beat when it comes to ORIGINALITY and convenience. However, WDW has DL beat when it comes to quantity... Disney, Disney, Disney. WE LOVE them both for the different experiences they give.

Any true DISNEY freak has to go to the ORigINAL at least once.


P.S. If you go to Disneyland use RIDEMAX what a great program!

Well, We have to add to our comments after our return trip from WDW...

We had a great time, enjoyed the Saratoga Resort! I do have to say... I forgot what a pain it is getting out of the MK at the close of the park. WOW. Plan on staying in line for at least 1hr or more!!!! Monorail - Packed, Boat - Packed. DL is SO much easier. Spent lots of money dining at WDW. WDW has DL beat in the "in park" dining. Both DL and WDW have downtown disney - same experience. New Orleans Square beats Liberty Square - hands down. Monorail running thru the DL park... beautiful. The original TOT at MGM so much better than DCA. Its a small world, better (exterior) at DL. Pirates of the Carabean better at DL. We still love them both... DL so much more convenient, WDW so much bigger. We will have to continue to visit both parks... Disneyland will always hold a special place in our heart. :love:

[nick1234]

Okay well I have been to disneyworld many many times, mainly because I live in Tampa. 2 years ago I visited Disneyland. Haha, wow I HATED it!

Disneyworld has so much more to offer it was just sad. You really do feel like your in another world, a magical one. Disneyland, I felt like i was in a typical city filled with cars and buildings. It was terrible. The park is smaller, the people, the vibe, it just isnt the same.

The best way to have a great time at disneyworld, stay at a Magic kingdom Resort!!!!! Its about 2 minutes away from the park and your connected to other hotels and it's a great way to spend your vacation!

PS if you want a paradise, fresh resort, STAY AT THE POLYNESIAN!! it has a great view of magic kingdom, only about 3 minutes away from the park =]

[Albertan mom]

Funny to see this old thread pop up again!
I went back and read my post.
We had been to DL once, and we were going again.
Since then, we have been to WDW.
We are going to WDW again in August.

We liked WDW because:
Bigger
More to do
Waterparks
Cheaper to stay onsite, which is great.
Fun extras--parasailing, speedboating, Cirque De Soliel etc..
Free dining plan, which we are getting again, closed the deal!

We love both though!

[Love Profusion]

Why to go to Disneyland!

1| Disneyland does some things better in my opinion:
-The Tiki Room (DL has the ORIGINAL show)
-The Toon Town in DL is bigger and has more to do when compared to Toon Fair in DW
-The Pirates of the Caribbean is longer and has more drops and detail in DL
-It's A Small World is visually superior in DL

2| Disneyland has several things The Magic Kingdom does not:
The three big ones!--
-Indiana Jones (just waiting in line for this ride is amazing!)
-The Matterhorn roller coaster
-Submarine Voyage: Finding Nemo

Other minor ones:
-The Alice in Wonderland ride
-Mr. Toads Wild Ride
-Pinocchio's Daring Adventure
-New Orleans Square
-The Tarzan Treehouse

3| Disneyland has California Adventure -- Sure, Disney World has MGM Studios and the Animal Kingdom, but California Adventure has all the major rides that are in both of those parks (and is right across the street from DL -- no bus required!).

-MGM Studios has the Tower of Terror and the Rock N' Roller Coaster, whereas California Adventure has the Tower of Terror, too, and California Screamin', (a roller coaster with a loop inside the shape of Mickey!).
-The Animal Kingdom has a rapid ride, but only has 1 drop; whereas in California Adventure the Grizzly Rapids has 2 drops and is much longer and more fun.

(Plus, when California Adventure is done being remodeled, it will be far, far, far superior)

4| Disneyland is more convenient -- Everything is walking distance at the Disneyland Resort. Once you are on the park grounds you can walk to and from all three areas (Disneyland, California Adventure and Downtown Disney) in only a few minutes. At Disney World you must wait for a bus to go to any other areas, ride the bus for 20 or so minutes, and then finally reach your destination (makes things stressful and not as magical). I don't want to ride a bus in my happy place!

5| Disneyland is the original -- To put it simply, Disneyland has a charm and feel Disney World doesn't have, in my opinion.

Good things about Disney World: It has Epcot (which is very, VERY cool), a bigger (but not necessarily better) Downtown Disney, and a few fun water parks.

So my advice for anyone who has not been to either: go to Disney World for Epcot, and then go to California for the original! ;)

[sydangel68]

Thanks for the post and the replies everyone. We are actually going to do both resorts for our next vacation in August. Spending 7 days at DLR and then 13 days in Orlando primarily for WDW.

We've been to DLR a few times and I am looking forward to seeing what all the fuss about is with WDW. My research is making me doubt that 13 days will be enough!

Will make sure I do a trip report when we get back.

Cheers
Angela

[trodrigue]

I have been to WDW 3 times, all without kids. I have been to DL about 15 times, only 4 of those times with kids, as the Mom. I do believe that both places are wonderful and magical. Without kids, I really like the better dining options as well as the other shows and things that The World has to offer. However, the temperatures and the humidity of Florida could possibly completely ruin a trip for me, so I would not risk going again, unless it was going to be like in January, or some other month that I knew I could handle the temps. I would only bring my family if my kids were 8 years old or older and even then I would not likely park hop. The size of the parks are exhausting, and the traveling between is difficult and time consuming. I also would not go for less than 10 days, and we seldom have that much time for vacationing.

DL however is absolutely wonderful for young families. It is easy to go back and forth between parks, easy to return to your room midday for rest, easy to use fast pass runners and minimize line waiting.


Okay, so I admit it. I do love DL the best. But I do also love WDW. Really I am looking forward to the 2011 Hawaii Disney park, so I can compare and contrast. Can't imagine I won't love it!

[Casey's Mommie]

Disney is not actually building a theme park in Hawaii. They are only building a resort hotel.

"The resort, Disney's first without a nearby theme park, will emphasize family-centered vacations while respecting Hawaii's culture, said Disney Parks & Resorts Chairman Jay Rasulo."

[Lovin' Lorne]

So my advice for anyone who has not been to either: go to Disney World for Epcot, and then go to California for the original! ;)

:thumbsup2 I totally agree. IMHO, the MK has nothing on the charm of DL. It's just so much more "Disney" than that great huge monster over in Orlando.

Oh, how we would have loved for CA to have been an EPCOT type of place. Hopefully the re-vamping will help along those lines.

Now having said that, I need to get back to planning my 10th trip to WDW in the last 14 years. :cool1:

[mt mommy]

While I love DLR. One thing I am not a fan of is the food. I have been to DLR many times, but no food compare to WDW. All the food we've eaten in WDW is 100% better, especially some of the places in Epcot. I wish DLR had some comparable to Le Cellier or LTT.

Just my 2 cents for what it's worth.:)

[DMMarla07860]

I'll be going to DL for the first time in July, only for two day, then I'll be on a Disney Cruise. I'm excited to see DL and all the stuff in CA never been there. On the other hand I've been to WDW 7 times, and I love it, I'm sure I'll love DL as much as I love going to WDW, just costs less to travel to Florida for me. Now If DCL puts a ship out in CA for good when the new ships are built I might have to switch up going to WDW and DL every other year lol one can only wish right

[Mike_M]

I grew up going to DL and this past summer I got to take my son there for his 1st trip/Birthday. I lived in FL for a couple years and I was able to make it over to WDW 2x in 2000 & 2001 and The differences were definitely noticeable to me.


1st the negative
The only real disappointment I had with WDW was Fantasyland. MK still has the Medieval fair look that DL had prior to the 1983 redesign. It doesn’t immerse you in the fantasy as well IMHO. It's most noticeable at Small World which really disappointed me in its presentation. There is also a lot less at the MK Fantasyland. Alice, Casey Jr, Mr. Toad, Pinocchio, Storybook land, Matterhorn; all missing from MK. It's a bit strange to me why the park with the most real estate would have a smaller and less impressive Fantasyland.

As for the rest of the parks, Epcot and DAK were only interesting enough to me for a day each. Granted, each park has a bit more now then they did back then (Mission Space, Nemo, and most of all Everest looks like a worthy successor to the Matterhorn and can finally excuse the lack of our beloved Swiss Mt.)


Now for the positive
The rest of MK is a pleasant surprise in layout and rides when you are used to DL, especially the western half. The way that the familiar rides are different in their own way makes them unique treats to discover. Most noticeable to me were the two jewels of any Disney park, Haunted Mansion and Pirates. Pirates of the Caribbean’s walk through prison as the queue is a cool addition to the lore and makes slow lines entertaining. pirate: My wife and I had our best Disney hospitality experience at this ride. We were there right before we got married in sort of a pre-honeymoon. I had on a Mickey top hat and my wife had on a Minnie veil. When we got to the boats, the ride handler instantly placed us to the side, no questions asked and gave us the next boat completely to ourselves. I've never had a problem with hospitality at DL, but they do seem to give just a little bit extra at WDW.

MGM was a fun park and we spent a lot of time there. Both ToT and Rock n rollercoaster are better than their DCA counterparts (California screamin is the closest thing to RnRC and not nearly as good).

Overall, My heart still lives in So. Cal but WDW is something every West Coast Disney fan should experience at least once.

[mt mommy]

I grew up going to DL and this past summer I got to take my son there for his 1st trip/Birthday. I lived in FL for a couple years and I was able to make it over to WDW 2x in 2000 & 2001 and The differences were definitely noticeable to me.


1st the negative
The only real disappointment I had with WDW was Fantasyland. MK still has the Medieval fair look that DL had prior to the 1983 redesign. It doesn’t immerse you in the fantasy as well IMHO. It's most noticeable at Small World which really disappointed me in its presentation. There is also a lot less at the MK Fantasyland. Alice, Casey Jr, Mr. Toad, Pinocchio, Storybook land, Matterhorn; all missing from MK. It's a bit strange to me why the park with the most real estate would have a smaller and less impressive Fantasyland.

As for the rest of the parks, Epcot and DAK were only interesting enough to me for a day each. Granted, each park has a bit more now then they did back then (Mission Space, Nemo, and most of all Everest looks like a worthy successor to the Matterhorn and can finally excuse the lack of our beloved Swiss Mt.)


Now for the positive
The rest of MK is a pleasant surprise in layout and rides when you are used to DL, especially the western half. The way that the familiar rides are different in their own way makes them unique treats to discover. Most noticeable to me were the two jewels of any Disney park, Haunted Mansion and Pirates. Pirates of the Caribbean’s walk through prison as the queue is a cool addition to the lore and makes slow lines entertaining. pirate: My wife and I had our best Disney hospitality experience at this ride. We were there right before we got married in sort of a pre-honeymoon. I had on a Mickey top hat and my wife had on a Minnie veil. When we got to the boats, the ride handler instantly placed us to the side, no questions asked and gave us the next boat completely to ourselves. I've never had a problem with hospitality at DL, but they do seem to give just a little bit extra at WDW.

MGM was a fun park and we spent a lot of time there. Both ToT and Rock n rollercoaster are better than their DCA counterparts (California screamin is the closest thing to RnRC and not nearly as good).

Overall, My heart still lives in So. Cal but WDW is something every West Coast Disney fan should experience at least once.

Very well said. I love both parks, but I TOO noticed more hospitality or a bit more "magic" at WDW.

Do you think it's because the CM can be so much more immersed at WDW than a DLR. Who knows, just a thought.:confused3

[Mike_M]

Very well said. I love both parks, but I TOO noticed more hospitality or a bit more "magic" at WDW.

Do you think it's because the CM can be so much more immersed at WDW than a DLR. Who knows, just a thought.:confused3

I had heard once that all new CMs at DLR start at DCA and have to earn a promotion over to DL. If this is true and the same kind of thing exists at WDW, then MK has a much larger pool of candidates and can be much pickier with who gets to be CMs. You would really be getting the best of the best at MK.

Just a thought. :)

-Mike_M

[ckdipp]

I have been to DL in '69 and '80. WDW in '75, '76. '78, '82, '93, '04, '06, '07x2 and will be going back to DL in June '07 with my kids... can't wait! I'm excited to see the differences in DL since being there way back when!!

[klacey1]

I think it's fair to say that I have significantly less WDW/DL experience than many here, but my view has more to with Orlando as a whole as opposed to Los Angeles/Anaheim.
Overall, if there wasn't such a drastic difference in plane fare ($600 to fly from NY to CA, as opposed to $200 to fly to FL), I would have such a hard time deciding between WDW and DL.

Pros for DL- If you stay about 40 minutes away, like we did, in Newport Beach, you get both the amazing Pacific Ocean AND DL! You can go back and forth between DTD, DCA, and and DL in one day; the parks are much more manageable. We did DCA in one day on its own and felt that sufficed, 2 days at DL was perfect. In one day at DCA, we were able to hit Soarin' twice, TOT three times, and Screamin! twice. It's great to have a place where these great rides are at ONE park. At DL, we were able to do all the major attractions multiple times-- in July! We also had a fun day at Universal. Oh, and the weather is gorgeous. No matter how hot it is, it's never humid. The fruit stands were priced better and fresher.

Cons for DL-It's really more for a long weekend than a week or more. I can imagine getting bored after a couple of days; although I'd love to go once a year or every other. The LA area has little to offer and seemed a little...grimy.

Pros for WDW- So much to do, so many parks. So many great restaurants. So many great OTHER attractions-- SeaWorld, a much much much better Universal Studios, Islands of Adventure.

Cons for WDW- too spread out. I really feel like doing more than one park in a day is too stressful. The Orlando weather is disgusting in the summer-- humid and rainy. Has seemed...dirtier in the past few years.

I have many fond memories at WDW, but our one trip to CA/DL was simply amazing. I'd probably have to visit them more equally to offer a more valid opinion, but overall, I have to give DL the advantage. The convenience, history, and cleanliness wins out :-)

[caffingdu]

well, I've only been to Disneyland. I've been there countless times, as I only live about 20-30 minutes away. I used to have the Deluxe annual pass, but that expired, and it's a lot of money. But I love Disneyland. Like others have said here earlier in the thread, I've always liked seeing the Matterhorn on the way to Disneyland when i was a little kid. That's what told me that we were almost there, and I got really excited. Back then, it was as big and important landmark as the castle.

Disneyland has always had that magical feel to me. Just walking down mains street makes me feel like a young child again. The smell of the bakery, and the sweets. And the place has so much history, which all adds to that magical feeling.

Of course, DCA opened in 2001. I went there, didn't like it nearly as much as Disneyland, but still liked it. But I found that after a few hours it was hard to find something else to do. And there are definitely some things that Disney did the DCA that, like other people, I don't agree with or like. Like others have pointed out, Paradise Pier is exactly what Walt did not want, so it's kind of ironic that they made it under the name "Disney". Plus it was made on the cheap side. It was made for 600 million dollars. They should have put a lot more into it. I'm looking forward to the renovations though. For the most part, I like what I hear of what's going to happen. It'll cost about 1.1 billion dollars, which is almost twice the amount it took to build the park in the first place! So hopefully this will fix the slightly troubled park.They seem to be making it feel more "Disney", and I like the idea of making the entrance like 1920s L.A. It'll be like a 1920s L.A. version of mainstreet with the cable cars that they'll have running up and down the street. I'm not so sure that "Cars Land" is a good idea. It's good that they're adding more land, but an entire area devoted to one movie? not sure I like that idea, but it's good that they'll be adding many more rides.

I also hear that it's possible that they're going to add a third theme park. DLR now has enough area to build another theme park. I guess they bought 88 acres of strawberry fields a while ago right by the park. But after DCA didn't do as well as Disney thought it would do Disney is putting off a third theme park I've heard. I really hope to see them build a third theme park sometime though. I would also really like to see a version of Epcot here in California.

I've never been to WDW, but will probably go someday. From what I hear both DLR and WDW have their pros and cons. I'd like to go to compare the two resorts myself.

[Sleepless Knight]

Like many others, the two resort complexes give off a different vibe. While WDW has the whole complete immersion in all things Disney experience, one of the perhaps unappreciated beauties of Disneyland is how you can drive through the madness and stress that is L.A. rush hour traffic and then see all the stress wash away as soon as you step through the main gates to Disneyland.

Here are a few of my observations about Disneyland and WDW. While WDW is bigger, it is also much more spread out. I read once that between the 4 parks, WDW offered 72 attractions to the 63 attractions offered at the DLR. That tells me that Disneyland really knows how to use what space it does have.

Second, I believe that Disneyland's charm comes from the fact that it is smaller. WDW's Main Street has taller buildings which seem out of scale to Main Street(due in large part I believe to the tremendous size of the castle).


On my last visit to WDW, they used the Emporium windows to hawk just about anything you could buy in the Emporium. At Disneyland, some of the windows for the Emporium are modeled after what you would see in a turn of the 20th century store. Others featured the beautifully elaborate window displays used by Disney over the years to showcase upcoming animated films, both brand new and re-releases of the classics. While DL does advertise merchandise from some of it's windows, it's a very different experience to see a handful of merchandise surrounded by an elaborate display as opposed to the display feauturing only merchandise.

I also wonder if part of Disneyland's charm comes from the very reason why Sleeping Beauty Castle is so small. Walt himself did not it to be a large and intimidating building because in castle times, those buildings were used to intimidate the lower classes. Now, please don't misunderstand this to be a knock on Cinderella Castle or the MK. It's just that Walt Disney was personally involved with every single detail and even the day to day operations of Disneyland(he even had Space Mountain mapped out before his death in 1966, though the ride itself opened in 1977). Disneyland has Walt's personal touch.

The original factor comes into play because it's been my experience that the original attraction is quite often also the best. And since Disneyland is the first park, it obviously has the most original(as in build there first) attractions, especially with Fantasyland and POTC, HM.

[JustHomeFromDL]

I just returned yesterday from my first trip ever to Disneyland. I had previously been to Walt Disney World 8 times between 1988 and 2000 because my Grandparents lived in Tampa, FL.

DL was incredible. It felt much more like home in the Magic Kingdom here as opposed to the LONG walks in the blaring sun of WDW without Walt's footprints. We loved New Orleans Square and had delicious steak gumbo bread bowls right after our ride on a better Pirates of the Caribbean with more drop-offs that went through the Blue Bayou restaurant.

We were thrilled to see Mr. Toad again and also enjoyed the new Finding Nemo Submarine Voyage ride that was worth the 60 minute no Fast Pass wait. The original Fantasmic show was amazing. Overall, the feel of Fantasyland was better as well.

Bad things about DL Magic Kingdom compared to WDW: Though it was very easy to interact with characters at Mickey's Toontown, there were absolutely no trees over there. It seemed like Michael Eisner made a conscious decision to avoid trees to force patrons to leave Toontown and spend money getting thirsty from walking more through the other parks.

And the worst offense was this year's Disneyland budget. There was paint that wasn't looking at all magical (gasp!) on certain rides and trash in the trash cans which were almost always empty at WDW from being constantly taken out. It was very clear that Walt would have been so beyond offended. What is happening is that the huge amounts of money from the Magic Kingdom is being funneled to replenish the offensive California Adventure "restoration" project.

And about California Adventure.....we were saddened. I mean that. The area near California Screamin' and Toy Story that looks like a low-rate Atlantic City/Coney Island carnival pier, is SO NOT what Walt would have wanted. What should have happened is that TPTB should have focused on Pixar completely over there and made rides based on that alone. Get rid of the roller coaster Screamin' feel, and keep the Bugs Life area. And then make a similar Toy Story area, a Cars Themed area, a Monsters Inc area. Throw in some adult rides. Keep Soarin' that was just Awesome! And my son loved the Grizzly Rapid Run ride. The new Toy Story ride was well worth it.

Here's the main problem: Michael Eisner thought he could do California Adventure cheaply and make money. Wrong dear, you clearly aren't Walt. And we are NOT fooled despite your best efforts.

There are NO trees in CA, which means that we spent A LOT of time at shows like Aladdin, Bugs Life in 3-D, and the Muppets in 3-D to beat the heat.

We loved the Palm trees, but it's time to invest in some shade trees if you want families with little kids to sweat it out.

I will always love WDW since the magic started for me there. You could do Typhoon Lagoon and Busch Gardens back then, and we also loved the magic of Fort Wilderness and the activities it offered.

At DL, we stayed at Days Inn Disneyland at the Park which shuttled us in. It wasn't quite the package we had at WDW or the overall experience. But, I prefer the DL Magic Kingdom.

We also had cheaper plane tickets to LAX from Austin, TX. I liked that I could buy more souvenirs and hit the beaches, Universal Studios, Knotts Berry Farm, and visit Hollywood, because I had money left over after 3 days instead of the 5 it would have taken at WDW.

I missed Epcot while at DL and would have loved the Animal Kingdom being added instead of California Adventure, which is a COLOSSAL mistake that I just don't see improving, even with the so-called more Disney-like rides they want to add.

I think the old addage is still true. If you have the time and the extra cash, go to WDW. But, if you happen to be heading to California for other reasons or you have just a few days, a stop to the DL Magic Kingdom is SO worth it.

I'm already thinking about my next trip to WDW. I'm not looking forward to the heat, humidity, or the crowds. What I hate the most are the snottier families at WDW that are rude and extremely wealthy, with kids dressed up in character and crying because that polyester Tinkerbell uniform isn't very comfy for a ride on Space Mountain. DL seemed to have a lot fewer of those.

But, I am looking forward to the 4 parks and the overall experience. The Honey I shrunk the Kids playscape and heck, even the Golden Girls' house. What DL Magic Kingdom has in Walt's class, the overall WDW experience has in style.

[dlvet]

walt didn't want a boardwalk park because it was so common at the time. they are a part of the pacific coast culture, and since DCA is a celebration of California, it makes sense that they could have a part of a park (not a whole park) themed as a romantic boardwalk. and toy story mania fits perfectly there, not like in florida where its so out of place. and clearly disney wouldn't make a park devoted only to pixar. i definitely think DCA is redeeming itself and could potentially become a full day park with car's land and the new rides. and the 1920 LA entrance will be icing on the cake

[alexis1012345]

Ive been to both and yes, i agree that it makes one somewhat bias for their home one. I lived in florida for 3 years as a kid(3-5 grade) and 4 years as a teenager(all high school) and am going to college here currently. So obviously, ive been to disney world TONS. when it was the end of 5th grade and i moved out of florida, i remember missing WDW SOOOO bad! i moved to oregon btw. so of course in oregon, we decided since we need our disney kick that we should go to DL. it was great, but for me i think i prefer WDW. some of you say how WDW seems like it needs to much planning around it and that at DL you can just go there for a day and know everything and when to ride and what rides to ride etc, etc. But for me thats how i am at WDW. i know that place like its my house or something! i know the perfect months to go and what rides are going to be crowded when and how to get from one park to another by walking (besides Magic Kingdom).
Now based on all that, i still really enjoyed DL. It seems like WDW and DL would be so similar but they really arent! I love them both, but WDW is just like a home to me. I really missed eating the delicious meals they have at Epcot while i was at DL, but still its a totally different experience. I really liked it because it was the first Disney theme park and so that was really exciting. also i loved space mountain. I loved DL, i just was comparing it to WDW which i knew so well, that it made me not like DL as much as WDW, buuut i still loved DL. I really do. Both parks are great, and i think if you ever have the chance that you NEED to go to both of them! both have a totally different experience, both are fantastic, both make you happy (unless there is crowds of course :) ), and both are just a great fun time! so do try both if you have the chance, and you will all probably have a preference as to which you like better, thats why i hate that its so hard not to compare them when youve been to one so many times. Wish i didnt keep comparing DL to WDW while i was there because thats porbably why i enjoy WDW better. anyways, yeah they are both great i just prefer WDW a little more... :)

[alexis1012345]

"-MGM Studios has the Tower of Terror and the Rock N' Roller Coaster, whereas California Adventure has the Tower of Terror, too, and California Screamin', (a roller coaster with a loop inside the shape of Mickey!).
-The Animal Kingdom has a rapid ride, but only has 1 drop; whereas in California Adventure the Grizzly Rapids has 2 drops and is much longer and more fun.

(Plus, when California Adventure is done being remodeled, it will be far, far, far superior)"

I understand that DL has some perks and so does WDW, but these really dont make DL THAT much better...
Tower of Terror at WDW i enjoyed a bit more than the one at DL, but the one at DL is great, too. But as for California screamin vs Rock N' Roller Coaster- Rock N' Roller Coaster is far far faaaaaar better! The whole experience of it is great really. the whole ride its blasting the fast pace aerosmith music and before the ride theres the count down with steven tyler screaming "5, 4, 3, 2, 1!" ride in the speakers by your ears, its just great. California has the cool loop, but really Rock N' Roller Coaster is much greater overall than that one..








" 4| Disneyland is more convenient -- Everything is walking distance at the Disneyland Resort. Once you are on the park grounds you can walk to and from all three areas (Disneyland, California Adventure and Downtown Disney) in only a few minutes. At Disney World you must wait for a bus to go to any other areas, ride the bus for 20 or so minutes, and then finally reach your destination (makes things stressful and not as magical). I don't want to ride a bus in my happy place! "

I agree, that Disneyland is easy to walk around, that part really is great! But for Disney World, its not like you NEED to get a bus. Theres a path that leads From Epcot to MGM (vise versa) and the walk is beautiful. Of course, it is a bit of a walk and my family is very active, more than the average american family so some would prefer the bus/car. Also, there is a path to go to Animal Kingdom, too. The only one that you cant walk to is Magic Kingdom. You take the monorail there, which sometimes can be quite annoying but once you are on the monorail and not waiting in line, its great. You just get so excited especially once you see the castle and all the other attractions from the window, the anticipation is great.




" 5| Disneyland is the original -- To put it simply, Disneyland has a charm and feel Disney World doesn't have, in my opinion. "

Disneyland has a great magic feel, i agree. It is the original so that part is great and hard to beat!
But Disney World has the charm and magical feeling too, just not if in your mind you're comparing it to DL or thinking about how its not the original. I remember when i first moved back from oregon to Florida, it was my first time back to WDW in YEARS, and i was walking from MGM to Epcot, and i had just ridden the Tower of Terror and Rock N' Roller Coaster, and i had the greatest feeling in the world. It was all so magical. And then when i went back to Magic Kingdom and I saw the castle i was soo happy. It was like home, and it was so magical and it really felt like "the happiest place on earth", as they say. When you have the right mind set it really has just as much charm and magic as DL does.

Now, i know i may sound like im trying to argue, im really not, it's just both parks are great, and if you really think about it, not all of those "negatives" of WDW are negatives at all... :) good day.

[Disneygirl3715]

The rides are more original.

[WaterPoloLaw]

They are both great parks and I have visted both many times.

Here is how it boils down:

WDW

1. WDW has the worldshowcase, which just cannot be replicated in any theme park anywhere.

2. WDW has kilamanjaro safari at AK, which is the second coolest thing you will find in any theme park anywhere.

3. WDW has a bigger DTD and Disney Quest, which are great.

4. WDW has better shopping, shows and themed dining experiences

5. WDW has the best waterparks in the world. Disneyland does not have a waterpark.

6. WDW is bigger and has a certain overwhelming "WOW" factor that Disneyland does not have.


Disneyland

1. DL is the best stand alone theme park anywhere in the world (even better than TDL, Epcot and TDS). It truely blows the doors off the MK and is really a magic kingdom and a half. That said, there are only two parks in DL as opposed to 4 parks and 2 waterparks in WDW.

2. Likewise, DCA is really a theme park and a half and (aside from worldshowcase, TDS, and the original DL) DCA is really the next best Disney theme park. Really, DCA is like a DHS on steroids with a few e-ticket attractions at epcot and AK also thrown into it (but arguably better versions). While you get 4 theme parks in WDW, you get 2 "park and a halfs" and DL, though WDW certainly has more "stuff."

2. DL is MUCH more convenient than WDW. Regadless of where you are at in the parks, you are only about a 5-10 minute walk from DTD and to your hotel room if you stay on property and only about a 15 minute walk if you are off property. This is a major advantage for families with young children...trust me. Park hopping in WDW is a joke compared to the park hopping in Anaheim

3. The weather in Anaheim is (on average) MUCH better than the weather and humidity in Florida. Much fewer rainy days and thunderstorms as well.

4. Disneyland and DCA have way more attractions per acreage than the parks in florida. While Florida has more and bigger parks, DL and DCA have many more attractions per park, which again is nice -- especially for families with young children.

5. Rides and attractions are often cloned between the WDW and DL. DL will tend to have the better version of these cloned rides (i.e., POTC), but not always.

6. What WDW has in size and grandeur, DL is said to have in incredible theming, maintenance, convenience and intimacy.

After visting both many times, I would say that they are both great. In truth, I personally prefer DL (but that may be because I have a young family and the convenience and "hassle-free" nature of DL cannot be replicated at WDW).

[Fosterlv]

Remember that Disneyland was the home of Walt Disney - His brother created Disney World. Personal Fan of Disneyland. It has more to offer looking at the park itself comparing to the Magic Kingdom Park.