Underwater/waterproof cameras, cases and housings [Archive] - The DIS Discussion Forums

DISNEYLOVER70

04-11-2006, 01:23 PM

I finally did it... I broke down and bought the Canon Rebel XT. I absolutely love it!!!! I am an amateur but the shots I have taken on auto are incredible.

Anyways...my question is this; I bought it, now what? I didn't get the kit that comes with it, because the bag holds extra lenses and it huge. I want something that I can put the camera in while on rides to protect it from water. Any handy ideas?

When I went 3 years ago, I brought my Canon Elph, which took good pictures, but all my night shots and several others were blurry. So as much as I don't want to carry this bulky camera around, I am going to.

I am sure I can go to Circuit City where I bought it and find some type of bag, I just wondered what other DIS'ers have done with their cameras while on rides...

captaincrash

04-11-2006, 08:59 PM

I have never taken my DSLR on a water ride and would not dare to unless very throughly protected. Two ideas I found on ebay (not that I'm recommending either of these - but it is all that I found) is first... this "Rain hood" option which is nothing more then a bag with a lense filter and hood up front~ and it's cheap at $20.99+$10 to ship ... copy item number 7586531646 to your Ebay search box to see it...

http://i11.ebayimg.com/03/i/03/dd/0a/9e_1_b.JPG

and this second alternative is a bit more serious. it can be seen by copying this number 7579826945 to your Ebay search box. This item costs $300 and is rated to 150' for a DSLR and hot shoe mounted flash.

http://i4.ebayimg.com/03/i/05/e6/75/3c_1_b.JPG http://i14.ebayimg.com/02/i/05/e6/6d/dd_1_b.JPG

Jeanne B

04-12-2006, 05:45 AM

Here's a link to the aquapac waterproof cases that I've seen recommended a few times in the past. I bought a Canon underwater housing for my A610 last month for $170 for but we'll be using it for snorkeling. For rides at WDW I'm sure you could find another alternative for less money.

http://www.aquapac.net/

DISNEYLOVER70

04-12-2006, 05:53 AM

I will check into all of that. I have to come up with some type of plan, I really want this camera at Disney, but I ride ALL the rides with my kids..have to think about this I guess.

dcg0317

04-12-2006, 05:58 AM

I would just get a nice camera bag to use in the parks and at home, I have a camera backpack that I brought to WDW with me, and I also brought the Tamrac photo sling bag to use in the parks, just bring some gallon size zip lock baggies and a large garbage bag to put the camera and camera bag in when going on water rides, that's what I did and I belive most here on the photgraphy boards do too.
http://www.tamrac.com/welcome.htm

mabas9395

04-12-2006, 01:08 PM

Are you looking for a water PROOF HOUSING so that you can take pictures under water? Or are you looking for water RESISTANT BAG so you can carry the camera in the rain or on Splash Mountain and have it not get wet?

Depending on what you want, the answers are very different.

I have a Rebel XT and carry it around in a Tamrac Digital Zoom 4. Its not weather proof and it doesn't hold extra lenses, but when I want to just grab the camera and go, it works great. But since I have added a few accessories to my collection, I am also in the market for a larger bag that can hold three or four lenses and a flash.

WillCAD

04-12-2006, 07:01 PM

If you're looking for something to keep your camera dry on water rides and in rain, you could try the WillCAD Camera Poncho (patent pending). This is a self-service product, some assembly required. Instructions follow (click any pic for the full-size version):

Materials and tools required
* 1-gallon Ziploc bag
* Scissors
* Camera

Step 1
Cut approximately 1/2" of the bottom corners off the Ziploc
http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/thumbs/th2006-04-12-03.jpg (http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/2006-04-12-03.jpg)http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/thumbs/th2006-04-12-04.jpg (http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/2006-04-12-04.jpg)

Step 2
Take strap off camera, put camera in bag, lens facing to bag zipper
http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/thumbs/th2006-04-12-05.jpg (http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/2006-04-12-05.jpg)http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/thumbs/th2006-04-12-06.jpg (http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/2006-04-12-06.jpg)

Step 3
Feed strap connectors through clipped corners of Ziploc and re-connect to camera
http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/thumbs/th2006-04-12-08.jpg (http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/2006-04-12-08.jpg)http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/thumbs/th2006-04-12-09.jpg (http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/2006-04-12-09.jpg)

Step 4
Seal bag and admire your cleverness
http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/thumbs/th2006-04-12-09.jpg (http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/2006-04-12-09.jpg)http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/thumbs/th2006-04-12-10.jpg (http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/2006-04-12-10.jpg)

Step 5 (optional)
You can take a pic when your camera is inside the bag by opening the zipper. This may expose your lens to water and requires caution to keep the camera dry, but it can work. I have personally gotten a few pics in very heavy rain like this and kept the camera perfectly dry the entire time.
http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/thumbs/th2006-04-12-11.jpg (http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/2006-04-12-11.jpg)http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/thumbs/th2006-04-12-12.jpg (http://************/photos/2006/2006-04-12/2006-04-12-12.jpg)

Result:
http://************//photos/2002/Roll-112/112-05.jpg

Belle's Castle

04-12-2006, 09:35 PM

Willcad....very nice. Nothing like keeping it simple!

DISNEYLOVER70

04-13-2006, 03:43 PM

and everyone else for some great ideas!!!!! :thumbsup2

lauriegs

04-20-2006, 08:51 AM

Does anyone own one of these? My dh thought it would be good to have one, so we could use it by/in the pool, and wouldn't worry when we're on water rides and such. Just wondering if it's worth the investment, and which brand is good. thanks!

Kelly Grannell

04-20-2006, 09:00 AM

I've used the Pentax Optio WP and it's more than decent. I won't use it as my main camera (but that's just because I'm too analytical about my pics) but at the same price of a proper underwater case for my camera, I'd rather but that.

The other option, but I haven't tried is the Olympus 720 SW. It's not only waterproof, but supposedly shockproof too.

disneyfan551

04-21-2006, 11:02 AM

WillCAD

04-21-2006, 11:14 AM

A little OT, but...what type of zoom does the XT have? This is a camera I'm considering buying and I don't understand the lenses and all of that stuff... :sad2: I love the pictures from that camera, but am used to a 10x zoom with my Z1 and I hope to have the same (or more!) zoom on my next one. Thanks! :wave2:

The Rebel XT is one of a class of cameras called SLR (Single Lens Reflex), which have interchangable lenses.

SLR lenses are measured in focal length, or the distance from the lens to the film plane or sensor. This is expressed in millimeters. I don't know all of the multiplication conversions, but I do know that 125mm on the Rebel XT is roughly 6.9X.

When you buy a Rebel XT, the most common configuration is a kit which comes with a zoom lens which goes from 18mm to 55. 18mm is a nice wide-angle.

However, the interchangable lens system gives you tremendous flexibility - you can buy the camera body only and buy other lenses - there are hundreds on the market, from super-wide to super-tele.

My choice in lens was a Sigma brand 18-125mm, which gives me wide angle to about 6.9x. It cost a little over $200, in addition to the camera, and is an excellent lense that takes pics without a lot of fish-eye looking distortion, which is called pincushion, when I shoot a wide-angle shot.

disneyfan551

04-21-2006, 11:21 AM

Wow, thanks for the detailed info! I really do appreciate it. Do you have any suggestions on where to buy the camera/lenses? I worry about buying online, and really worry about buying anywhere! Mostly because I did have to return 2 Z1's before, and I know that Costco has a good return policy, so that is who I used during my last purchase. Of course, they don't have alot of options, and I've even seen cheaper prices online. What would you suggest?

Thanks again!! :sunny:

mabas9395

04-21-2006, 12:53 PM

Disneyfan551,

The X's that you see in zooms, whether its 3x, 4x, or now 10x and 12x, is simply how much longer the longest focal length is than the shortest focal length. For example, camera #1 can have a range of 15mm-150mm and camera #2 can have a range of 50mm-500mm and both would have a 10x zoom because 150 is 10 times greater than 15 and 500 is 10 times greater than 50. So using 10x as your guide can sometimes be misleading because its no guarantee how much "reach" your lens will have.

As for buying online, costco is fine but they don't have much of a selection. I have bought from B&H Photo and Adorama Camera, both of those have a very well established reputation for quality and respectability.

If you are thinking about getting an XT (its a great camera btw, I love mine) but you don't understand "the lenses and all that stuff", be warned that while a dSLR has the potential for incredible photos, it also has the potential for horrible photos if you don't know what you are doing. So if you get one, be prepared to spend at least a little time in learning about shutter speed, aperture and ISO and how they inter-relate.

There a bunch of great pleaces to learn more, such as this book "Understanding Exposure" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0817463003/sr=8-1/qid=1145642549/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-0471160-1077438?%5Fencoding=UTF8

And these websites:

http://photoworkshop.com/canon/
http://www.dpreview.com
http://www.photography-on-the.net/forum/

Have fun and good luck with your new camera.

WillCAD

04-21-2006, 02:30 PM

The best deals you're going to find on a Rebel XT are online these days.

B&H Photo (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/) is the biggest and the best. They are the most reliable, reputable camera dealer, with the best customer service and return policies, of any camera dealer in the US. Their prices do tend to be a bit higher than their competitors, but if customer service is important to you, you absolutely cannot go wrong with B&H.

I have bought from Adorama (http://www.adorama.com/) a few times with good results. They are also one of the biggies, and their prices can be lower than B&H, or equal. If their price is equal or higher, go to B&H instead.

I have also bought from Tri-State Camera (http://www.tristatecamera.com/home.php). They are also a big, well-known, reputable company. I found recently however that the prices on their eBay store are often better than the prices on their own web site, so check that out first. They are listed on eBay as tri-state1. In fact, they currently have the Rebel XT listed on their eBay store for $778.97 with the 18-55 kit lens http://cgi.ebay.com/CANON-EOS-DIGITAL-REBEL-XT-EF-S-18-55-KIT-BLACK-NEW_W0QQitemZ7610724756QQcategoryZ43454QQtcZphotoQ QcmdZViewItem

A Rebel XT is a pretty good beginner SLR. SLRs tend to be more complex than point-and-shoots, but that complexity comes from their flexibility. If you are really looking for a great camera, an SLR is the way to go, because SLRs are more like camera systems than just cameras. You can add new lenses, external flashes, and other accessories to a basic SLR, one thing at a time over several years, to build your camera outfit, and if a component breaks or you feel that you have outgrown something, you can buy a replacement without buying a whole new camera.

toyotaae86lg

05-09-2006, 08:03 PM

Hi there, i'm looking for a nice digital underwater camera I can use in the hotel pool. I think it would be cool to get some pics underwater of the fiance and I. I have come acroos two cameras: Pentax Optio W10 6.0 megapixel Waterproof Digital Camera and the Olympus Stylus 720 SW 7.1-Megapixel Digital Camera With Shock Proof and Waterproof Design. The pentax is priced at $250 and the Olympus is priced at around $350. I only need it to go down probably 4 feet because it is going to be used in a pool. I want to know if anyone on this forum has had any experience with either of these. I just want the camera....I don't want to use disposable and I dont' want to buy a new camera and get a waterproof case. I'll spend the money but I want the digital camera/waterproof all in one package...If anyone can help that would be great...cheers
chase

Kelly Grannell

05-09-2006, 10:29 PM

I've only used Pentax Optio WP (first generation) picture quality is not bad at all, but the looking at the LCD outdoor in even only semi-bright light is near impossible. Maybe they've improved upon that.

Stephieann

05-27-2006, 06:30 PM

How well does the fuji one time underwater cams do?

Ratpack

05-28-2006, 07:08 AM

I think that is the ones we use, greenish blue in color. They do pretty well as long as there is plenty of light. Nice sunny days in the pool should give you some good shooting conditions. Overcast days could turn out dark since there is no flash. We usually keep one in our pool bag.

keishashadow

06-05-2006, 08:07 AM

Hi

We're afraid to use our "good" cameras when snorkeling/swimming, etc, even with the waterproof housings available.

Getting sick of buying the one-time use versions - pricey buying several new ones each trip.

Several eBay sellers have a flash, reloadable version - Tura.

Anyone have any experience with this brand? Just expecting quality that you'd expect from a disposable Fuji or Kodak.

TIA

Kelly Grannell

06-05-2006, 08:56 AM

how deep do you go? If you're only going about 3 ft deep for less than 30 minutes each time, Pentax Optio W10 is a good choice.

Kelly Grannell

06-05-2006, 09:04 AM

oh, and to answer your question, I don't think it's going to be worse than disposable Fuji or Kodak (shudder). I don't know whether it's compatible with ISO 800 film or not, though (the Fuji underwater cameras are all ISO 800)

keishashadow

06-05-2006, 09:12 AM

Never thought to check what speed film (duh!). We don't go more than 10 ft below surface.

thanks.

Kelly Grannell

06-05-2006, 09:15 AM

the eBay selling page mentioned it comes with ISO 400 film, but ask the seller anyway whether it will electronically accept ISO 800 film (or if there is a manual selection to set it to ISO 800).

Jeanne B

06-05-2006, 10:04 AM

I know you said you're afraid to use an u/w housing with your camera but I just wanted to mention that I bought the Canon housing for my A610 in March and I let my brother borrow it while he and his wife were on vacation in Belize. He had no problems with it and he got some very nice pictures. DH, DD and I are going to the Virgin Islands in 3 weeks and we'll be using it a lot since we'll be snorkeling almost every day. I saw some u/w pictures recently taken in the Virgin Islands with an A95 (I think) using the Canon u/w housing and the pictures were fantastic.

Although I don't have any firsthand experience with the housing yet other than my brothers experience I just wanted to give you some feedback from someone who owns an u/w housing.

spoon2003

06-05-2006, 10:36 AM

I just looked on Ebay and the camera look alot like something Target used to sell under the Minolta or Pentex brand for $19.99 and it was awful. I bought one and tried it, the seal did nothing in the bathtub.

I also second the u/w housing, I have one for my digital elph and it has been great.

Sue

keishashadow

06-05-2006, 01:22 PM

Thanks, just can't get over being afraid I'll hit the wrong button & camera will open & get wet.

I'm "hard" on cameras.

Kelly Grannell

06-05-2006, 02:01 PM

keishashadow

06-05-2006, 02:06 PM

will check it out - thanks again:thumbsup2

spoon2003

06-05-2006, 02:14 PM

considering the relative high price of UW housing, I've checked last year's model Pentax Optio WP, it's about US$250 and it's waterproof down to 5 ft. IIRC, it's a 6 MP camera with 3x zoom.

hope it helps.

Wow, the price has dropped! When I bought the u/w housing in late 2004, the cheapest waterproof model was around $500.

At this price, I would go with the Pentax, which is roughly 10 disposables plus cost of processing.

extreme8

06-06-2006, 09:49 AM

FYI,
I wanted a fairly rugged P&S to compliment my DSLR and decided on the Optio W10 (newer version of the WP)
I found it on ebay, new in box, full US warranty for $205 shipped.

webshark3

06-06-2006, 10:18 AM

considering the relative high price of UW housing, I've checked last year's model Pentax Optio WP, it's about US$250 and it's waterproof down to 5 ft. IIRC, it's a 6 MP camera with 3x zoom.

hope it helps.

I got the WP and love it (5mp), the WPi is 6mp and improved, and the w10 (6mp) is even better yet in performance and image quality.

Any way you go with the Pentax, they're waterproof without a case, and make a great backup for those rainy days in the parks.

Also, Olympus has the Stylus 720 SW (Waterproof) Same as the Pentax, however, you can buy an additional waterproof shell for deeper dives. Definately gives more flexibilty.

kaw1218

06-11-2006, 03:04 AM

considering the relative high price of UW housing, I've checked last year's model Pentax Optio WP, it's about US$250 and it's waterproof down to 5 ft. IIRC, it's a 6 MP camera with 3x zoom.

hope it helps.
I have the 4mp version of this and it takes great underwater shots! I love it for the beach, sesame place, and even out back in the pool. It is pretty durable(I have dropped it twice)
This was a quick point and shoot shot.
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g129/kaw1218/6de309ca.jpg

and this was taken in epcot.
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g129/kaw1218/14eff080.jpg

rtphokie

06-18-2006, 05:23 PM

Found this on one of Adobe's customer submission pages. It's a free Photoshop Action which does about the best job I've seen of color correcting underwater photos.

I've used it on all of my photos taken at Castaway Cay on a recent Disney Cruise. These are from a Canon Powershot G3 in a EWA Marine bag. I'm no expert but I think the results are nearly as good as what you'd get with a several hundred dollar strobe flash and has be added benefit of not lighting up the particulate matter that floats in the water.

Before: http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/5973/before4ue.jpg
After: http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/736/after6jv.jpg

underwater color correction (http://share.studio.adobe.com/axAssetDetailSubmit.asp?aID=8419) (requires free registration to download)

Not sure if the link will work or not, if it doesn't, visit Adobe Studio Exchange (http://share.studio.adobe.com) and search on "underwater correction".

Kelly Grannell

06-18-2006, 05:38 PM

also ctrl-shift-B will do the same thing. :) (well, not 100% the same, but very close)

DebºoºS

06-18-2006, 06:06 PM

wow thanks! I have quite a few CC pics and Nassau pics that could benefit from this. :thumbsup2

lbgraves

06-18-2006, 06:45 PM

OK, I downloaded this but my computer wont recognize the file. Do you have to have photoshop installed or something?

rtphokie

06-18-2006, 06:46 PM

also ctrl-shift-B will do the same thing. :) (well, not 100% the same, but very close)

I tried automatic color balance and wasn't happy with the results. It overdoes the contrast, still has an overly blue cast to it, and the colors are too oversaturated (something I'm sensitive too because Canon digital cameras produce so very rich blues and greens).

Thats just me though.

Buddy Bear

06-18-2006, 07:30 PM

OK, I downloaded this but my computer wont recognize the file. Do you have to have photoshop installed or something?

an "atn" file is a Photoshop Action File (http://share.studio.adobe.com/axBrowseProductType.asp?p=2&t=5) which performs a series of actions to accomplish the desired results. The short answer is yes you need Photoshop since this is a photoshop action file. The link above will give you more details.

Kelly Grannell

06-18-2006, 09:12 PM

I tried automatic color balance and wasn't happy with the results. It overdoes the contrast, still has an overly blue cast to it, and the colors are too oversaturated (something I'm sensitive too because Canon digital cameras produce so very rich blues and greens).

Thats just me though.

True,

what I usually do in full is as follows:

1. ctrl-shift-B
2. ctrl-L and make sure the left and the right sides of the histogram are perfectly pointed, and then move the middle slider to 1.2 up to 1.4 depending on the scene
3. add orange photo filter with 35% intensity.

While the action is very good, it gives the unnatural look (to me) of taking picture in an aquarium. Of course this is purely subjective.

Kelly Grannell

06-18-2006, 09:41 PM

PS: I tried the underwater action for many of my underwater pics, only one or two came out great, the rest are really really bad. Dunno why.

Anewman

06-18-2006, 09:54 PM

PS: I tried the underwater action for many of my underwater pics, only one or two came out great, the rest are really really bad. Dunno why.

IMO all AUTO(anything) or ACTIONS will be hit or miss, that is why I tend to do everything manually. Unless all pictures were exactly the same there can not be one exact setting to correct them all...

I have never taken underwater photos, so I would be curious to see how adjusting in raw could work.

Anewman

06-18-2006, 10:06 PM

underwater color correction (http://share.studio.adobe.com/axAssetDetailSubmit.asp?aID=8419) (requires free registration to download)

Not sure if the link will work or not, if it doesn't, visit Adobe Studio Exchange (http://share.studio.adobe.com) and search on "underwater correction".

How about we try a little leaching??

try this link (http://share.studio.adobe.com/fsroot/172617/8419/underwater.atn)

Please give feedback if the link works or does not.

skr8pn

07-25-2006, 11:19 AM

I'm heading to hawaii for my honeymoon in sept and I started looking at the cost of a water proof case for my A70. It's a little, OK a lot, higher than I thought. Being as it is so much I wondered does somebody else on here have one they would like to rent for a nominal fee. I know I wouldn't use it all that much and I'm sure you don't either, why not get a small return on the investment?

Or any other ideas?

boBQuincy

07-25-2006, 04:35 PM

Does a "nominal fee" include beverages that normally come in packs of 6?
If so, I have a EWA-Marine soft case for a Canon A70 that is available for loan!

It's only rated to go to 15-30 feet, but I am only rated for surface use so it worked out well. ;)

skr8pn

07-26-2006, 02:10 PM

I may be able to accomadate such a trade. I've also heard a rumor there may be an open bar at a certain upcoming wedding. :banana: :cool1:

bazzanoid

08-26-2006, 07:44 AM

Hi all!

I'm bringing my lowly P&S on vacation with me this year since i don't want to carry the dSLR & lenses around - mainly because i'm also carrying my camcorder. DW refuses to use either of them so i get the fun job of filming and shooting at the same time :rolleyes:

Anyway, I'm after waterproof housings for both the camera and the camcorder but the only ones i can find over here in the UK are generic cases made by Greenaway - the Seapro marine range - and they're blinkin' expensive for what i need them for. All i'm doing is maybe diving 5 metres max at discovery cove, and taking pics/film while there. so naturally i'm not willing to spend tons on one day's shooting.

Anyone know where i can get my hands on casings for them, either in the US or the UK? Thanks in advance for any help.....

Camcorder - Sony TRV-238E
Camera - Panasonic DMC-LS2

Cheers! :cool1:

Barry

Jeanne B

08-26-2006, 07:53 AM

You might find what you need here...

www.aquapac.net

Judge Fudge

08-26-2006, 08:02 AM

You might want to see if EWA-Marine makes an enclosure for them. They make a pretty varied amount.

bazzanoid

08-26-2006, 08:07 AM

Excellent thanks for the replies guys - aquapac looks to be the way to go - floaty and non-bulky, at an outstanding price!

cheers!

VAgal76

09-03-2006, 09:03 AM

I have a Canon A95 camera and was looking into waterproof housings for our upcoming cruise. I came across two of them.

One that is pretty heavy duty.

http://www.digitalfotoclub.com/from-froogle.asp?id=964594808&rf=froogle&dfdate=09_01_2006

One that goes up to 33 feet which would suit my needs and the price is great but makes me nervous that it would leak.

http://goshotcamera.zoovy.com/product/WPC005WP500_CAN_4

We are not divers nor do we plan on becoming scuba divers. Has anyone used any of these devices? I didn't want to go into this blindly and end up ruining my camera. Any insight is greatly appreciated.

TIA! :wave:

Jeanne B

09-03-2006, 09:25 AM

I have the heavy duty one for our A610. We spent 10 days in St Thomas and St John in late June, took TONS of underwater pictures and had no problems whatsover. We just made a point to take the o-ring out every few days, clean it thoroughly and reapply the silicon grease.

The aquapac is another cheaper option and I've seen it recommended by others.

www.aquapac.net

We love to snorkel so for us the investment in the heavier duty Canon housing was worth it since we'll get a lot of use out of it in the future. I also let my brother use it for his trip to Belize and he had no problems with leaks either.

Judge Fudge

09-03-2006, 09:50 AM

The first link appears to be the OEM canon model, which would be a good investment if you ended up having a leak you might have more recourse with Canon.

I had one for my Pentax Optio 5Si, oem model, and it worked great in Hawaii.

VAgal76

09-03-2006, 10:33 AM

Thanks for the responses. It sounds like I should make that initial investment. We are going to Hawaii next year. :scratchin

Where did you guys end up buying yours? I always worry about places I'm not familiar with (like the one I linked to).

tinksdad

09-03-2006, 12:52 PM

Those baggie cases make me nervous! I would opt for the Canon UW case, for $158 you have a good case that will protect your investment.

FWIW, I've flooded a Olympus camera in an Oly case in the camera dunk tank. My point is that you don't have to go down very far to have water enter the camera case. Be very careful with the o-rings and set the camera up in a clean, well lit area.

lsayd

09-03-2006, 03:40 PM

We were in the same position last year - spend the money for the canon housing (I have an S70) or go the budget route. Luckily, we had a dive shop locally that had the bag types in the store, so we bought the camera there to test them out (picture quality wise, not water proof wise). The pictures all looked like they had been taken inside of a bag - like there was a film over them. Needless to say, we spent the money and bought the canon housing which works perfectly and have since taken hundreds of great pictures in rivers, pools, and down in the ocean in the Keys (and more to come in a few weeks when we head back to the Keys!). My vote is to definitely spend the money and get the housing made for your camera. Have fun with your underwater picture taking, whichever way you decide to go!

By the way, I bought mine through digitalfotoclub.com and received it the day after I ordered it with regular shipping! I've ordered 3 cameras and lots of other accessories from them and have always been pleased.

VAgal76

09-03-2006, 05:17 PM

Thanks, guys! :thumbsup2

I thought our disposable underwater camera did "OK" but not what I've seen here on the boards. :confused3 That's what made me start researching this. :teeth:

Jeanne B

09-03-2006, 06:27 PM

Where did you guys end up buying yours? I always worry about places I'm not familiar with (like the one I linked to).

I bought mine from Amazon. I was going to suggest checking resellerratings.com for the website you mentioned because I've never heard of it before but they actually have a higher rating then Amazon (I checked their overall rating). But still I've never heard of them.

allyn

09-05-2006, 11:34 PM

we always buy underwater housings for our cameras (canon s230, canon s400) and now we have to buy one for our new canon sd700is.

we added up what we were spending on disposable cameras and developing and it wasn't too hard to justify the high-quality canon cases, which are built like tanks. we sell old our old ones on ebay when we get new cameras and need new cases.

MarkBarbieri

09-06-2006, 06:08 AM

I use an EWA Marine ziplock bag and an old Canon 10D. So far no leaks. The hard shell cases look like a better option for p&s cameras but for SLR's, a hard shell case is just way to expensive for me.

http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371159-M.jpg

http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371166-M.jpg

http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371151-M.jpg

mishoe01

10-28-2006, 10:29 AM

Hi there - figured this was the place to come to w/ my questions :)

I'm looking for a digital camera that has a casing that allows me to use that same camera both on land and "under the sea" (heehee).

I figure it'll be costly (I looked several years ago and they were starting at $600).

If anyone has any thoughts/opinions/recommendations I'd really appreciate all the help.

Thanks!

manning

10-28-2006, 11:22 AM

Have a look at the Pentax Optio W20. About $300.00.

http://www.pentaximaging.com/products/product_details/digital_camera--Optio_W20/reqID--8356288/subsection--optio

Jeanne B

10-28-2006, 11:40 AM

Well, you'll be happy to find that you can find a nice setup for a lot less money these days. :)

Many of the Canon cameras have u/w housings. I bought a Canon housing for my A610 back in the spring and it was $150, not bad IMO considering we took hundreds of u/w pictures with it during our trip to the Virgin Islands this summer, and it will get a lot of use in the future.

Check amazon and bhphotovideo for the Canon housings and the Canon A6x0 and A7x0 series cameras get very good reviews.

boBQuincy

10-28-2006, 01:22 PM

The Ewa-Marine "housings" are often under $100 and are fine for casual underwater use. They don't look like much more than glorified heavy duty plastic bags but they are made well and I have never heard of one leaking.

MarkBarbieri

10-28-2006, 03:11 PM

I have an EWA bag. I use it for my 10D. It works pretty well. I'm always nervous about leaks, but I haven't had a problem so far.

http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371174-M.jpg

http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371155-M.jpg

mishoe01

10-28-2006, 09:07 PM

Thanks for the replies.

I right now have a 3 (almost 4) yo HP digital camera, and I know they don't make a housing specifically for that camera.

Manning--thanks for that link, only issue I would probably have is that it's only good to a depth of 5 feet.

boBQuincy and MarkBarbieri - I think I know what the Ewa bags are - was worried about the leaking too, so hadn't thought too much about that.

Since I'm ready to buy a new camera, I just figured it'd be better to buy one that has a housing that comes w/ it....doesn't mean that I'm correct though.

Thanks for the comments.

allyn

10-28-2006, 11:51 PM

most of the small canon cameras have underwater cases. for example, the SD600, which is now just a little over $200. but camera prices are dropping much faster than underwater case prices. the underwater case from canon is around $150.

we've had a couple of underwater cases for various canon cameras and we've never had a problem with leakage.

tinksdad

10-29-2006, 09:54 AM

Nikon, Canon and Olympus all have a fairly extensive line of P&S cameras and UW housings. If your needs are basically on the surface and light diving during a snorkeling episode the bags "might" work out. Personally, I would spend a bit more and get something that would be safe to about 100' that way you know that its' built to stand the rigors of under water pressure.

Once you get something, make SURE you clean and take your time putting the camera in the housing. No lint, hairs or fuzzies since it WILL leak if one of those gets across the o-ring seal. Don't ask me how I know...... :rolleyes1

Mi3stooges

11-10-2006, 07:31 PM

rtphokie

11-10-2006, 09:31 PM

Would like to know what most feel is the best underwater camera, a one time use? The brand?
I found a link from here and it was to a dive shop, the camera is about $50 but it does not say if its reloadable.
Here is the link to it...

http://www.leisurepro.com/Prod/CategoryID_971/Context_965/Sort_Stock/DescSort_0/AQUFE.html?Hit=1

Any suggestions?? I hope to take some nice photos in Maui and Oahu!!

It probably is reloadable but you might not be very happy with the quality.Similar cameras can be found on ebay for around $20-$25.

If you've already got a camera you are happy with, consider getting a waterproof enclosure for it. I had very good luck with an EWA-Marine bag.:

http://rtphokie.smugmug.com/gallery/1862065

AZ JazzyJ

11-13-2006, 01:32 PM

I'm still stuck in the film realm for my underwater camera. I use a Nikonos. It takes great pictures but I struggle getting them in focus all the time (I am getting better at distance estimation for shallow depth of field though). This is one of the photos I took in Mexico diving off the coast of San Carlos.
http://www.jeffdsummers.com/album/Hobbies/slides/eel.jpg
The next photo I have is all blurry of the inside of an eel's mouth as it tried to swallow my camera. I really need to quit sticking my head in underwater holes without knowing exactly what is inside.

Jeff

Mi3stooges

11-18-2006, 10:21 PM

What do you think of this?? I would use it for an Olympus Stylus 500, so IF it were to get ruined, it wouldn't be my DSLR....

http://cgi.ebay.com/DiCAPac-WP-300-underwater-digital-camera-housing-case_W0QQitemZ110056842723QQihZ001QQcategoryZ50506 QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

tinksdad

11-19-2006, 10:43 PM

If you're just going to be snorkeling or light surface diving, then that bag will "probably" be OK. Olympus puts out some decent underwater housings that are good for diving down to 100'.

No matter what, you might want to get some additional insurance on the camera, just in case.....

This was taken with a Olympus C-770 and housing in Cozumel.

http://dkeddy.phanfare.com/show/external/70385/70387/3378055/file.jpg

Mi3stooges

11-20-2006, 06:50 PM

What an awesome picture!! I won't be diving, just some water shots while snorkeling.

qanita92

12-17-2006, 01:30 PM

MarkBarbieri

12-17-2006, 01:46 PM

Very few cameras are made to work in the water. Most people that do underwater photography by a waterproof case or bag for their normal camera and use that.

extreme8

12-17-2006, 01:53 PM

The Pentax Optio W10 and the newer W20 both work underwater. Another advantage to the waterproofing is that they are dust (sand) proof as well.
I have the W10 for times when I don't want to put my D200 in harms way and it's a lot of fun.

rtphokie

12-17-2006, 02:01 PM

What cameras will work underwater? I think I will but the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7 (does that work underwater?) and buy a one time use camera that works underwater from CVS. Do they work good underwater?

Any camera will work underwater with a waterproof housing or bag.

On a budget, Dicapac (http://goshotcamera.zoovy.com/product/WPC005WP500_CAN_4) cases are very inexpensive ($35)

Take a look at what EWA-Marine (http://www.google.com/url?sa=L&ai=B6AA_86CFRZHfOJ6QwAKaprHMBNyGwhPg5fSfAvzusfgHsJ AfCAAQARgBILZUKAJQk6iyuwZgyf6xiqSkxBGYAbyGAaoBI29y Zy5tb3ppbGxhOmVuLVVTOm9mZmljaWFsK2NmcysyR01MyAEByA KgyKEB&q=http://www.amazon.com/o/redirect%3Ftag%3Damd-google-20%26path%3Dsearch-handle-url/index%3Dblended%2526field-keywords%3Dewa-marine%2526results-process%3Ddefault%2526dispatch%3Dsearch/ref%3Dpd_sl_aw_tops-1_blended_25465627_2&usg=__cXuVIPfWlsns3K8AZ7d2WKhk5xM=) has to offer. I've not heard a single report of leakage and the quality of the photos is great.

Personally I wouldn't mess with the new waterproof digital camera. You can get a much nicer digital camera with one of the bags above for the same price or less.

MarkBarbieri

12-17-2006, 02:10 PM

You can see some underwater photos taken with an EWA Marine bag at:

http://barbieri.smugmug.com/gallery/1859532

Here are a few:

http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371143-M.jpg
http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371163-M.jpg
http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371157-M.jpg
http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371173-M.jpg

GrumpyOne

12-27-2006, 05:13 AM

There are a lot of cameras that work underwater. Some are designed that way from the get-go (sea-and-sea) while all of the major manufacturers have some number of cameras that have manufacturer designed housings.

I personally use a Canon a620 with the Canon housing. The only problem with it is that the housing is only rated to 130 feet. While I could push my luck, I choose not to. When I upgrade to a DSLR I'll probably go with a housing that can go to 200-300 feet.

tubachick

12-27-2006, 09:24 AM

Gdad

12-27-2006, 09:30 AM

I have the Pentax W20 for work since it is dust & water proof. It takes decent pictures for a P&S but I have not tried it underwater yet. The EWA bag looks interesting though - I may need to look into that for my dslr.

robertchance

12-27-2006, 09:34 AM

click the link for an answer

http://www.steves-digicams.com/cameras_wr.html

SueEllen

12-30-2006, 09:00 PM

I just got the Olympus Stylus 720 for this very reason. It is shock proof (to a 5ft drop) and water proof (to 10 feet) It takes a fantastic picture too. I have been very happy with it so far (I've only had it a couple of weeks.) The only thing I miss is having a view finder (as I like that as a back up and not having to rely on just a digital screen) but the screen is very large so you can really see what you are shooting well.

Sue Ellen

rtphokie

12-31-2006, 02:57 PM

REI has their Aquapac waterproof camera cases (http://www.rei.com/online/store/Search?storeId=8000&text=1&page_size=50&brand=Aquapac&link=1&title=Aquapac&query=&cm_mmc=ps_google_vendors-_-vendors-_-Current_Brands_Group4-_-Aquapac) on sale. I just picked up the large case (which should be big enough to use the zoom on my Canon G3) for $24 (regularly $45)

http://a1072.g.akamai.net/f/1072/2062/1d/gallery.rei.com/media/713300_9996Prd.jpg

cryssi

01-02-2007, 04:18 PM

cryssi

01-04-2007, 12:52 PM

Ok, so I'm thinking of getting one of those fujifilm quicksnap marine underwater disposables b/c I'm scared to take a real camera and don't want to buy one...but do you think that I'd get good pics if I took our p&s?

I really just want to take some snorkeling pics at Castaway...should I just get the disposable, or invest in a $100 housing for the sd400? You know, because money grows on trees and what's another $100 when I'm probably going to be buying some kind of lens...lol

thanks...

c

Jeanne B

01-04-2007, 01:12 PM

We purchased an u/w housing for our Canon A610 but we do a lot of snorkeling. If this was going to be a one time shot than I'd probably have a hard time justifying a housing and a disposable would have to do. The disposables aren't great but you can get some okay pictures with them.

cryssi

01-04-2007, 01:20 PM

do you get good shots?

we have a pool, but no kids yet to take pics of...it would come in handy later, perhaps?

cryssi

01-04-2007, 01:50 PM

what about this:

DICAPAC UNDERWATER HOUSING FOR CANON CAMERAS
http://ec2.images-amazon.com/images/P/B000I566JG.01-A1KM4QXTQQPGX4._AA280_SCLZZZZZZZ_V59180661_.jpg

http://www.dicapac.com/eng/menual-02.htm

has good reviews, but I am skeptical??

lsayd

01-04-2007, 06:01 PM

I have a Canon s70 and after looking at the less expensive options finally bought the underwater housing from Canon. We tried one of the "bag" types at a local store and felt the pictures looked like they were taken inside a plastic bag. We've used the camera snorkeling in the Keys, in local rivers, and in pools, and have always gotten great pictures (of course, the pool pictures are much clearer due to the water color - we used disposable underwater cameras before buying the housing and the difference in the pictures is tremendous). We also use it when we're on boats, in the rain, and around the pool if there's a lot of splashing going on. For us it was well worth the $159 I paid for the housing (we do test it each time we use it in a sink or something before taking the camera underwater - just me being compulsive! We've had it over 2 years, it's been in the water many times and have never had a leak), but I agree if you're only going to use it once, it's not worth it. But with a pool in the yard, I can bet you'd be using it more than on one vacation!

cryssi

01-04-2007, 06:08 PM

thanks...I'm going to have to really think about it. thanks again!

cryssi

01-05-2007, 02:36 PM

ok, just found another "disposable/reusable" underwater film camera w/ flash:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000HAMY84/yahoo-photo05-20/ref=nosim

http://ec2.images-amazon.com/images/P/B000HAMY84.01-A1CUXCEWGAZ8O2._AA280_SCLZZZZZZZ_V62679755_.jpg

anyone try this? I know I change my mind everyday, but if I can find an acceptable disposable, I might not have to invest in a housing...

thanks!

aquafamily

01-16-2007, 08:53 AM

Hello, Heading on a disney cruise in a few months and would like to get a new p/s with and underwater housing for the trip, anyone have a model they would recommend? Looking for a camera that will take good land pictures as well as good underwater pictures (good color and quality).

cryssi

01-16-2007, 10:59 AM

I am wrestling with that as well. Trying to justify the $125+ housing for our SD400, or purchasing a Snap Sights reusable underwater film camera with flash for about $20-30...

I have a friend who SCUBA dives and she uses her digital with underwater housing...the OEM one, not the cheaper "bag" ones like Aquapac or Dicapak...

what to do, what to do...??:confused3

I am guessing you want digital?

Jeanne B

01-16-2007, 11:57 AM

I have the A610 with an u/w housing, this camera takes greats land pictures and I've been very happy with the u/w pictures compared to the one-time use cameras we used in the past. I don't think you can find the A610 anymore but based on my A610 I would highly recommend one of the current A6x0 series cameras (or A7x0).

jiminyC_fan

03-13-2007, 05:55 PM

Hi everyone,

I know that several of you have purchased cases and/or digital underwater cameras. My question is: Do the cases work for a point and shoot 35MM camera? You know the kind that we all used before digital. I thought that it could save money if I could just buy a case for the old camera. I hate the thought of buying one for my digital camera. I love it too much to risk it. I am tired of the quality of the disposable underwater cameras.

Thanks for any help and advice!

AndrewWG

03-13-2007, 06:32 PM

That is a good question. The quality of the disposable underwater cameras is horrible, but very conveinient. I have not seen housings for regular film P&S cameras but I'm sure something exists as I haven't really looked for them either. I am still looking for one for my S2IS but I don't think they made one for that for some reason. Oh well, I can get one for the Canon A85 I have and that is very close in size to a regular P&S film camera. I think it would have to have the bottons in the right place, etc. Someone here knows, I'm sure.

jiminyC_fan

03-13-2007, 07:31 PM

Thanks Andrew. I really want to do some major research on the subject before our next cruise. We just got back from Cancun and the pictures from the disposable didn't do it justice.

KimberlyC

03-13-2007, 07:35 PM

Yes. There are plain bag type things that the camera goes into for around $25 and also they sell 35mm cameras in the housing. Give me a few moments to see if I still hav some links and I'll come back and edit this post.

Here's a bag - should fit a regular camera $30 http://www.leisurepro.com/Prod/CategoryID_976/Context_974/Sort_Stock/DescSort_0/Filter_6%3d694/APC410.html?Hit=1

Here are a bunch on EBAY -http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?sofocus=bs&sbrftog=1&from=R10&satitle=underwater+camera+35mm&sacat=-1%26catref%3DC6&sargn=-1%26saslc%3D2&sadis=200&fpos=48327&ftrt=1&ftrv=1&saprclo=&saprchi=&fsop=1%26fsoo%3D1&coaction=compare&copagenum=1&coentrypage=search&fgtp=

Sorry I cleaned out most of my links.

AndrewWG

03-13-2007, 07:54 PM

Thanks Andrew. I really want to do some major research on the subject before our next cruise. We just got back from Cancun and the pictures from the disposable didn't do it justice.

I know what you mean. I used them in St Thomas years ago and although I was happy that I could get pics underwater, the pics were really quite bad. I still look at them and dream, but I wish I had a better camera fo rthe job back then. Of course, my P&S film camera bit the dust on our second day there due to an overload of rum punch causing my hands to not hold things as carefully! :drinking1 But that is a different story...

extreme8

03-13-2007, 09:28 PM

Have you considered an inexpensive (relatively) digital waterproof camera?
The Optio W10 is under $200 now and it works great.
I use it places I'm afraid to bring my D200, not just underwater.
The kids have a great time with it in the pool when their friends are over. I just toss it in and let them have at it.

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n130/bpantani/water.jpg

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n130/bpantani/IMGP0619.jpg

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n130/bpantani/IMGP0607.jpg

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n130/bpantani/IMGP0736.jpg

tinksdad

03-14-2007, 07:04 AM

The cameras and housing change so fast that you can't find housings for cameras only a few years old at times (depending on the manufacture). What model of camera is it?? Maybe the bag would be a decent compromise, but it would only be good for a few feet of water pressure.

Alacrity

03-14-2007, 08:32 AM

Digital seems to be the thing these days and the camera makers are making cased for many of their cameras. Film was the think not long ago though! I would look on Ebay for a housing for older cameras. You may find folks looking to sell their film set up as they go to digital!

jiminyC_fan

03-14-2007, 10:43 AM

tinksdad

03-14-2007, 11:30 AM

Tinks dad, I just dug out my point and shoot camera and it is a Samsung Maxima Zoom 70i.

extreme8, your camera does great. Question though, we tried using the underwater camera when swimming at Xcaret's underground river. It was a dark area and of course the disposables don't have flashes and they really didn't turn out. Have you tried taking any pictures with yours where it needs a flash?

Andrew, note to self. Be careful of rum punch.:rotfl:

KimberlyC, I will check out those websites. Thanks for taking the time.

Bummer! I couldn't find ANY housing that was made for that camera. Maybe a bag thing will work for you. If you're just snorkeling, then it will probably work just fine. Just no flash, unless you use your on camera flash.

The main trouble with underwater photography is water reduces the light that strikes your subject by an great degree. The deeper you go, the worse the problem gets. Also, since water is more dense than air (duh....) you have to get within a few feet to get the exposure you see in your head.

Canon and Olympus have several cameras that they also make an housing for. These work pretty well and are made to be water tight down to at least 60' and aren't terribly expensive.

Someone already gave you a link to LeisurePro (http://www.leisurepro.com/Cat/Context_965/Photography/971.html)but this is their photography page.

extreme8

03-14-2007, 01:21 PM

extreme8, your camera does great. Question though, we tried using the underwater camera when swimming at Xcaret's underground river. It was a dark area and of course the disposables don't have flashes and they really didn't turn out. Have you tried taking any pictures with yours where it needs a flash?

I don't know how well it would work in really dark water or water with a lot of particles in it. In clear water where the subject is back lit or underexposed for whatever reason the flash works fine within 6 - 8 feet or so.
It's not a scuba divers camera since it only claims to be waterproof to 3 meters (maybe it was 5), but it's perfect for recreational use.
It's also dust sealed so beach sand doesn't hurt it either. Just swish it around in the water to wash it off!

The first time you take it in the water you get a "this just doesn't feel right" kind of feeling.

jiminyC_fan

03-14-2007, 01:50 PM

tinksdad

03-14-2007, 02:39 PM

extreme8, I just went to our camera shop and also Best Buy to look at your type of camera. One did have the Pentax W20 camera and the other had a Olympus Stylus 770. I am kind of leaning more towards that kind of camera since I talked with them about the waterproof cases. What I meant when I asked if you have taken pictures in a dark area is actually OUT of the water. We pretty much will be in clear water. I have also learned online at www.dpreview.com that Pentax is releasing a newer model, W30.

Then, I think about what Kevin said about Canon and Olympus cameras that have housings that can go deeper. I am so confused! We are just snorklers for now. DH has taken his first scuba class so he may want a camera to go deeper.

You're in the same boat with all of us!! There is SOOOO many choices with different options and abilities that it can make your head swim. Frankly, as a scuba instructor we always recommend that you get good a buoyancy before taking a camera along since it adds to the task loading. I only mention that because it does affect timing. But, if you're going to buy a new camera for underwater then you might want one that will do both.

It is a money sucking hobby. Here's the one I have for the D200:

http://www.ikelite.com/digicams/d200left.jpg

then there is additional ports for different lens, strobes.......... :scared1:

But its FUN!!! Here's a shot of a turtle feeding on sponges in Cozumel;

http://www.dkeddy.phanfare.com/show/external/70385/70387/3378024/file.jpg

jiminyC_fan

03-14-2007, 03:13 PM

Oh my gosh, I love the picture. We got to swim with turtles last year on the 10 day Wonder and I have since made turtles a favorite. Kevin, your camera is very intimidating to me. Who makes a D200?

jiminyC_fan

03-14-2007, 04:05 PM

One more thing, extreme8, where did you buy your Optio W10? I would really like to buy one from a retailer and not on the internet. I found a retailer that had the W20 but not the newest W30.

Gdad

03-14-2007, 06:43 PM

Here are a few shots with my W20- fun little camera mostly for work and places I would not take my dslr. :)

http://scl.smugmug.com/photos/129124932-L.jpg

http://scl.smugmug.com/photos/129125140-L.jpg

http://scl.smugmug.com/photos/127630595-L.jpg

jiminyC_fan

03-14-2007, 07:55 PM

Oh my gosh, Jeff. What fantastic pictures!

Gdad

03-14-2007, 09:01 PM

Thank you Sandy- I have also never used it underwater in low light but it does do alright in low light flash and nonflash on land. Good luck in finding something (and be sure to post some pictures with it when you do- would love to see Cancun!)

jiminyC_fan

03-15-2007, 09:07 AM

I am leaning more towards the W30 (latest version of the W10 and W20) because of the pictures two of you have posted with the W10 and W20. They seem to be very clear and crisp on land and the water shots are great. the W30 can go down to 10' for 2 hours. My husband is leaning towards the Olympus Stylus 770 because it can go deeper to 33'. Does anyone use the Olympus Stylus 770SW that could post some pictures? Or does anyone have any opinions?

Gdad

03-15-2007, 11:58 AM

Check the actual classification ratings on both cameras- I know when I got the W20 which said 6' for 30 minutes the Olympus at the time said something like 10' for 1 hour- but both cameras were JIS rated with a Class 8 waterproof standard. The time/depth examples were just two different marketing departments interpretation of the standard (One more conservative than the other).

extreme8

03-15-2007, 12:31 PM

extreme8, I just went to our camera shop and also Best Buy to look at your type of camera. One did have the Pentax W20 camera and the other had a Olympus Stylus 770. I am kind of leaning more towards that kind of camera since I talked with them about the waterproof cases. What I meant when I asked if you have taken pictures in a dark area is actually OUT of the water. We pretty much will be in clear water. I have also learned online at www.dpreview.com that Pentax is releasing a newer model, W30.

I've never had any problems with it at night, but you need to take the limitations of the flash into consideration. One of my favorite photos of myself and my wife was taken with this little camera by my 8 YO daughter one night as we sat by the pool. I would guess she was nearly 15 feet away and the exposure was great.

I did purchase this one from Ebay, so I'm afraid I can't help you with retail locations.
I do like this as a carry around camera that I don't have to worry about. Heck, I've got filters for my Dslr that cost almost this much.
I'm sure the newer generations are even better.

This one was taken from the middle of the pool at RPR at Universal.
Nothing special, but you can see the exposure was good, nice saturation, sharp. An all around capable and fun piece of equipment.
http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n130/bpantani/flower.jpg

jiminyC_fan

03-15-2007, 01:10 PM

I've never had any problems with it at night, but you need to take the limitations of the flash into consideration. One of my favorite photos of myself and my wife was taken with this little camera by my 8 YO daughter one night as we sat by the pool. I would guess she was nearly 15 feet away and the exposure was great.

I did purchase this one from Ebay, so I'm afraid I can't help you with retail locations.
I do like this as a carry around camera that I don't have to worry about. Heck, I've got filters for my Dslr that cost almost this much.
I'm sure the newer generations are even better.

This one was taken from the middle of the pool at RPR at Universal.
Nothing special, but you can see the exposure was good, nice saturation, sharp. An all around capable and fun piece of equipment.
http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n130/bpantani/flower.jpg

WOW!!

jiminyC_fan

03-15-2007, 01:43 PM

MarkBarbieri

03-16-2007, 09:02 PM

One of the reasons that I saved my old DSLR (Canon 10D) is so that I could use it in an EWA Marine bag without worrying so much about it.

Here are some shots I've taken in our pool:
http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371143-M.jpg

http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371159-M.jpg

http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371150-M.jpg

http://barbieri.smugmug.com/photos/93371174-M.jpg

jiminyC_fan

03-16-2007, 10:38 PM

Wow, Mark. Now I am really confused!

MarkBarbieri

03-17-2007, 04:23 PM

Unless you really want the extra hassles (and picture quality) of a DSLR, I'd strongly recommend something like the W30. It's just so much simpler.

jiminyC_fan

03-18-2007, 11:04 AM

I understand what you are saying Mark but the quality of your pictures are so perfect!

DueyDooDah

03-18-2007, 12:26 PM

Here is the main reason I picked up a Canon Powershot S80:

http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k72/DueyDooDah/IMG_2047copy.jpg

I'm a SCUBA instructor and love taking UW photos, when I have the chance. Unfortunately, I didn't get this little item until AFTER I moved to Seattle from Hawaii. Picture opportunities have dropped dramatically since I found out that cold water is much hard to get into than warm water. (It has to do with the hard shell that covers the seawater above latitude 23 deg. north)

jiminyC_fan

03-18-2007, 01:07 PM

Alacrity

03-18-2007, 08:42 PM

Here is the main reason I picked up a Canon Powershot S80:

I'm a SCUBA instructor and love taking UW photos, when I have the chance. Unfortunately, I didn't get this little item until AFTER I moved to Seattle from Hawaii. Picture opportunities have dropped dramatically since I found out that cold water is much hard to get into than warm water. (It has to do with the hard shell that covers the seawater above latitude 23 deg. north)

Heh! And I missed out on ice diving this year...maybe next!

A housed camera like this one gives you a bit of flexability. Even if you are not a diver the housing will protect the camera very will in all kinds of conditions. Digideep (http://www.digideep.com/) has posting that match a camera with a housing so you can see if your camera has a housing available. And they still work in the cold! I have a number of shots in the Great Lakes!

MellaWDWnut

03-19-2007, 03:32 PM

I was looking for a waterproof camera bag that I can put everything in for the parks. Something on the small lightweight side. We do not have lens for our camera. We have a Canon A620. Any ideas?

:thanks:

photo_chick

03-21-2007, 10:12 PM

I am reading this as you are looking for a bag to carry your camera and accesories in , not a bag to put your camera in to shoot underwater, right?

Tamrac has some nice weatherproof bags. They have all diferent sizes and are very affordable.

Here is the one I just got (in the camo)...
http://www.tamrac.com/AdventureBacpacks.htm

Thumper_ehhhhh

03-22-2007, 01:47 AM

I have the 200 aw and love it. There are others sizes too. They come with a built in cover that stores in the bottom of the bag. Heres the linkhttp://lowepro.com/Products/Sling_Bags/All_Weather_Cover/ Its a sling bag so you dont have to take it off when you go on most rides just swing it around in front of you.

boBQuincy

03-22-2007, 06:17 AM

My guess is you are looking for something to keep your camera dry through things like Kali River, more than just a rain shower. LowePro's AW series bags work very well for rain but for a drenching a more serious approach is needed! ;)

I carry a small lightweight "dry bag" as is sold at outdoor provision stores like REI.

http://www.rei.com/kayak/TOC/Dry+Bags?cm_re=toc*toc*dry_bags&vcat=REI_SSHP_PADDLING_LD

I put my camera bag in the dry bag and have not seen any water in it after a good ride on Kail River. Sure wish I had put my shoes in the dry bag too! ;)

Thumper_ehhhhh

03-22-2007, 06:33 AM

LeslieG

04-24-2007, 08:29 AM

deletedpenguin

04-24-2007, 08:52 AM

Do you currently have a P&S? If so, check out some of the waterproof containers. THey work well. I've got one for my Canon A520. They run about $160, but it's well worth it. You pictures will be 1000X better.

http://g-ec2.images-amazon.com/images/I/51BSG9SG3NL._AA280_.jpg

LeslieG

04-24-2007, 09:02 AM

I have a Kodak digital camera, but I've never seen a housing for Kodaks. Lots and lots of Canons, but no Kodaks. Have I missed them somwhere?

deletedpenguin

04-24-2007, 09:17 AM

http://www.waterproofcases.net/kodak.html

spoon2003

04-24-2007, 11:04 AM

I'm planning some snorkeling trips while on DCL and was wondering about waterproof cameras. In the past I've just used the disposable, but the quality is definitely lacking. And also since they contain 800 speed film, I've had to have them hand checked going through security.

I was wondering about purchasing a waterproof camera, not disposable, and using 400 speed film, thus alleviating the need to have it hand checked at security.

I would recommend Pentax or Olympus waterproof digital. I have a Pentax Optio W10 (last year's model) and has been satisfied with the pictures. Here are 2 from our DCL cruise last week, catamaran snorkle excursion and CC Stingray adventure:

http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m299/SueInBoston/IMGP0063.jpg

At CC, Stingray meets fish

http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m299/SueInBoston/IMGP0017.jpg

pretty good out of water too.

Sue

LeslieG

04-24-2007, 04:29 PM

If I decide to go with a digital, which would be better? Regular digital camera with a housing or an underwater digital?

I checked with Kodak directly, and they do not make a housing for their cameras. I'm a little hesitant to buy an off brand type.

tinksdad

04-24-2007, 04:51 PM

There is no such thing as a "waterproof" camera. Just water resistant. I know it's splitting hairs, but the water resistant ones are only resistant down to a certain water pressure, some only 10'-15' max.

If you're only going to snorkel with it then that would be the easiest thing to get, since you have one less thing to pack and the housings need to be assembled correctly with special attention paid to the o-ring. Any small hairs or lint can cause them to flood. That said, it would be more waterproof in the housing than one without.

LeslieG

04-24-2007, 05:23 PM

Alacrity

04-24-2007, 08:19 PM

Any recommendations on a good "water resistant" camera? It sounds like that would be the best way to go. The housing makes me a little nervous with such an expensive camera inside. We're not planning to dive, just snorkel, so depth isn't really an issue for us. Thanks for everyone's input.

All cameras are only water resistant at best...:rolleyes:

Sea and Sea and Sealife are two companies that make underwater cameras. Each has made housed and unhoused waterproof cameras. You can find film and digital versions. Sea and Sea, for example, has the MX-5 and MX-10; basic film cameras that can be found fairly inexpensively.

A couple links that might get you thinkin'

Sea and Sea: http://www.seaandsea.com/index.html
Sealife: http://www.sealife-cameras.com/index.html

Many places on the web carry one or the other. Sometimes both!

tinksdad

04-24-2007, 08:49 PM

Jeanne B

04-25-2007, 06:23 AM

The housing makes me a little nervous with such an expensive camera inside.

I have about $350 invested in my Canon A610 and Canon u/w housing which is about the same, and maybe even less, than some of the water-resistant cameras.

Gdad

04-25-2007, 06:33 AM

I have a Pentax W20 - I use it for work as it is water and dust resistant. Not designed for diving but it works great for swimming, snorkeling, water rides, rainy days, etc. 7mp digital I think I paid about $225 for.

http://scl.smugmug.com/photos/129124932-L.jpg

http://scl.smugmug.com/photos/129125040-L.jpg

http://scl.smugmug.com/photos/127630595-L.jpg

pyrxtc

04-25-2007, 07:17 AM

Olympus has the Stylus 770 SW (http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1287) that looks pretty interesting. Says it's "waterproof" down to 33fsw. Not bad!!

I had two of the Olympus Camedia cameras in housings. Both the C4040 and the C7070. They were pretty decent cameras and offered manual as well as scene modes. My main reason for upgrading was the shutter lag which is standard with the P&S (although it IS getting better). Check out all the scene modes in the specs on that camera.... quite a few!

I just purchased this and it looks like it's going to work out just fine. haven't tried it under-water yet but will be soon. It will work ok as a P&S. Still figuring it out but not bad and the price is right for a waterproof camera. it is also shockproof to 5 ft and crushproof to 220 lbs. Also good outside to -10 degrees so if you ski or like to ahve fun outside in the winter then it would be great for that too.

( and the box does say "waterproof)

Groucho

04-25-2007, 12:03 PM

Gdad, the Splash Mt picture is great!

Getting to the OP's question, I would definitely lean towards just one of the basic Pentax or Olympus water-resistant cameras... and if you need capabilities that they don't have, pick up a second camera. If you go with a waterproof housing, you're looking at one more thing to carry around and one more thing to either break or not attach properly, at which point the camera is toast, plus I'm sure that it's bulkier than just a ready-to-go underwater camera.

IwasatWDWforamonth

04-25-2007, 02:27 PM

Last November the security at Port Canaveral wouldnt let let me have my film or disposable camera hand inspected.

I like the idea of having the disposables in the water, cant count the times ive let go of them, im lucky they float.

I think I might get a waterproof camera before my next trip though, i'll just have to be more careful with it.

TigerLaw

04-29-2007, 02:30 PM

My waterproof camera pack finally came in the mail, so I am ready to start looking for the sunken mickey and the submarine boat - now all I need is to know what the heck I am doing!

So if anyone out there has tips for a first time underwater picture taker (flash/no flash/camera settings etc) please let me know!

thanks for the help!

justplaingoofy

04-29-2007, 02:42 PM

only tip I have for you is if it takes film and you are flying be sure to carry it on with you. When passing through security take it out of the bag and ask for a "hand check".

xray machines will ruin your film...

TigerLaw

04-29-2007, 03:18 PM

no more film cameras for me! :) I have a tizzy (panasonic dmc-tz1) and a dicapac water bag

cryssi

04-30-2007, 01:23 PM

I've been tossing this back and forth since we found out we were doing the land and sea back in january. DH has *almost* decided on the less expensive camcorder, so there's a possibility that I will get the canon underwater housing for our sd600. :banana: I want to take CC snorkeling pics! lol

As a side note, I may even be able to get my 70-300mm for the D200! :thumbsup2 but that's for another thread...lol

mylilnikita

05-05-2007, 01:49 PM

Hi
Planning a trip to Hawaii for October. Usually I would pack underwater disposable, Fuji, but would like to try waterproof pouch for my Nikon. Have you tried one and how well did it work? Thanks.

GDUL

05-17-2007, 08:58 AM

Alacrity

05-17-2007, 09:45 AM

I'm looking at the Pentax Optio W30 and the Olympus Stylus 770SW too. What I'm having a hard time with is that neither camera has an optical viewfinder. I know that both cameras state that they added features to the LCD to better focus them in bright / low light situations. Does anyone have an opinion about this? A third option is the Fuji F30. It does have an UW casing made specifically for it. Again, it doesn't have an optical viewfinder but reviews make it appear that Fuji has done a slightly better job at making an LCD screen functional in bright / low light situations. I've used Fuji digitals for years (FinePix 2400Z and S7000) and really enjoy them. That's why I considering the Fuji. Opinions? Thanks!

It looks like the Fuji does have a housing according to digideep.com ( http://www.digideep.com/english/digital/photo/camera/FujiFilm/FinePix-F30/12/2432 ).

Looking at the picture of the cameras you mention, it doesn't look like they have an optical viewfinder.

tinksdad

05-17-2007, 09:48 AM

I'm looking at the Pentax Optio W30 and the Olympus Stylus 770SW too. What I'm having a hard time with is that neither camera has an optical viewfinder. I know that both cameras state that they added features to the LCD to better focus them in bright / low light situations. Does anyone have an opinion about this? A third option is the Fuji F30. It does have an UW casing made specifically for it. Again, it doesn't have an optical viewfinder but reviews make it appear that Fuji has done a slightly better job at making an LCD screen functional in bright / low light situations. I've used Fuji digitals for years (FinePix 2400Z and S7000) and really enjoy them. That's why I considering the Fuji. Opinions? Thanks!

Using the LCD on the PnS is very easy underwater. Just stick the camera out there, frame and take the picture (adjust for shutter lag). The drawback is the hard sun, as it will tend to wash out the LCD a bit. Never used a Fuji, but I've heard decent reviews on them, many from divers that use them underwater. The Oly 770SW looks very intriguing to me. If it works as advertised that would a very easy camera to use for a broad diversity of situations!! Anytime you put a UW case around a camera it changes the size, and makes the adjustment of controls very different. You just have to get used to it.

cryssi

05-17-2007, 11:14 AM

I'm thinking of getting the Canon housing for our SD600. It's almost $200. I also considered getting a Snap Sights waterproof 35mm reusable with flash for about $25...haven't heard of anyone using it, though. Most just recommend I get the Canon housing.

I'm not brave/crazy enough to get a housing for the D200...but then again, it wouldn't be worth it for just one day of snorkeling at Castaway...

jiminyC_fan

05-17-2007, 11:15 AM

tinksdad

05-17-2007, 11:22 AM

jiminyC_fan

05-17-2007, 11:28 AM

Now that it is getting close to swimming time here in CO, I will try it out in a pool. Won't take it snorkeling until Sept. though.

GDUL

05-17-2007, 11:33 AM

I ended up with the Olympus 770SW. I had to get use to not having the optical view but am doing fine with it now. BUT......it is VERY difficult to see it in bright light. I took it to the zoo and it was pretty much impossible to see the capture in the LCD screen.

Hmmmmmm, that's what I was afraid of ........... I want to make sure that whichever camera I end up choosing that it be functional for land shots since that's where most of the pictures will be taken.

I'm thinking of getting the Canon housing for our SD600. It's almost $200.

My SIL has an older Canon and UW housing. He has taken some nice UW shots and it has an optical viewfinder for land shots. Maybe I should broaden my search a little - LOL!

disneyfan551

06-12-2007, 12:08 PM

GrumpyOne

06-12-2007, 03:06 PM

There are several housings available for the D50, depending on what features you want.

These were taken with my Canon a620 (a P&S). I was talked into taking it and the housing on my upcoming trip.

http://www.scubaboard.com/gallery/data/500/medium/Eel_Family_25.jpg

http://www.scubaboard.com/gallery/data/500/medium/Hermit_Crab_25.jpg

disneyfan551

06-12-2007, 03:08 PM

Great pictures! Thanks for sharing!!

GDUL

06-12-2007, 03:59 PM

Great thread! I'm just now researching cameras for my Sept. trip and I want a good underwater camera! Disposables just end up ticking me off! :rotfl2: I'm not even sure if there is underwater housing for my Nikon D50, but I would be too terrified to try it anyway.

Has anyone taken any recent underwater photos? Post them and share with us! Looking for more reviews, advice, etc... :)

Well, I made my decision ......... I bought a Fuji F31fd (for the larger sensor) and the WP-FXF30 waterproof housing. I haven't taken any underwater pictures yet (hopefully in July) but I've been very happy with the land photos.

jiminyC_fan

06-12-2007, 07:08 PM

I don't know how to post a picture but I was pretty pleased with an indoor pool underwater shot. It was with the Olympus 770SW. I will try and get my DD to post a picture for you guys.

rtphokie

06-12-2007, 08:56 PM

http://rtphokie.smugmug.com/photos/93511385-L.jpg

Post processing is as important or more important than the quality of the camera or the housing when taking underwater photos. The above was taken with a Canon G3 in a EWA-Marine case. Out of the camera, this shot and all others had a sickly green cast to it. A little color correction in Photoshop cleaned that up.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/items/277488.jpg

cryssi

06-12-2007, 08:57 PM

cruisecrzy

07-17-2007, 02:30 PM

On mylast few cruises I have used a friends Snap Sights 35mm camera that had a flash and I was happy with the results.

I just got a Hero P/S as a gift. I know it will be great to take to the beach or in our pool. I am just trying to figure out it will take good pictures if I brought it the next time I snorkel. It has no flash and that concerns me. I emailed the company and of course they said I would get better pics with their digital, but that the 35mm takes great pictures in clear water upto 15 feet deep.

Just wondering if anyone has had experience with this camera. I will certainly use it at the beach and splash pads near our house.

Here is the link to the camera http://www.goprocamera.com/index2.htm

Thank you all for your opinions and information

Pea-n-Me

07-30-2007, 05:12 PM

The camera cases are especially nice. They come in either small or large size and have a special pocket for taking pictures in or around water. (Large not available until September.)

http://cdn.llbean.com/products/sporting_gear_apparel/49835/images/M49835_Blue_Clear.jpg

http://www.llbean.com/webapp/wcs/stores/search?storeId=1&catalogId=1&langId=-1&startRec=1&numWanted=20&loggedIn=0&page_type=&hotBG=0&searchTerms=aquapac

jann1033

07-30-2007, 09:07 PM

good idea and not a bad price. i emailed to ask if a dslr would fit since not sure how the circumference would apply

jann1033

07-31-2007, 07:00 AM

they said a rebel with a 50mm lens would probably fit, but not a zoom and a P&s without a long zoom would probably fit. so guessing the S3 types would not work. he did say if it doesn 't fit though you can return it.

ColoradoMom!!

08-26-2007, 01:42 PM

Jimmy C Fan - anymore thoughts on your 770sw? I need to figure all this out myself before our cruise in Dec.

Everyone else - keep posting those pic's and tell us which camera you have. This is a great thread :cool1:

lsayd

08-27-2007, 10:19 AM

Taken with a Canon s70 with the Canon housing for it:

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a180/lsayd/IMG_5340copy.jpg

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a180/lsayd/IMG_5323copy.jpg

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a180/lsayd/IMG_5175copy.jpg

All were photoshopped to remove some of the green - I love the pictures we get from this camera and the flexibility the housing gives us to use it in places such as pools, the beach, etc. we otherwise would never use it at.

SharonLowe

08-27-2007, 11:18 AM

FYI for those who like to do underwater photography. NAPP http://www.photoshopuser.com/ in its latest magazine has a tutorial on correcting the color casts you undoubtably get when shooting underwater. I've tried it on some of mine and it works really well. I'll post examples when I get a chance.

ColoradoMom!!

08-27-2007, 11:23 AM

Perhaps I am going about this search wrong by assuming I should buy the Olympus 770sw type for underwater pictures. Looks like I should be looking at which cameras have great underwater housing available???

Any thoughts - you all are amazing photographers!!!:thumbsup2

PhotobearSam

08-27-2007, 11:55 AM

I was wondering if anyone knows if they ever made an underwater housing for the Canon A-40?

Since I am getting a new point and shoot (S5 IS:yay: ) I was going to see if there was any way to use my old camera for underwater.

Thanks for any suggestions.

Jeanne B

08-27-2007, 03:44 PM

I just checked out the accessories for the A40 on the Canon website and the u/w housing for it is the WP-DC200, they have it listed for $240 so you might want to check ebay (it's selling for $240 on Amazon also). I only paid $150 for my u/w housing from Amazon (for an A610).

cryssi

08-27-2007, 04:07 PM

from b&h:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/248553-REG/Canon_7727A001_WP_DC200S_Underwater_Housing.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/items/248553.jpg

PhotobearSam

08-27-2007, 06:44 PM

Thanks for the info guys...I'm looking for one as we speak.

The DIS ROCKS!!!!:thumbsup2

Jeanne B

08-28-2007, 06:44 AM

from b&h:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/248553-REG/Canon_7727A001_WP_DC200S_Underwater_Housing.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/items/248553.jpg

Hmm, interesting. I didn't even notice the WP-DC200s as an accessory for the A40 on the Canon website yesterday but looking at it closer I see it has both the WP-DC200 and the WP-DC200s listed indicating that both are compatible with the A40 but on Amazon and bhphotovideo it says the DC200 is only compatible with the A10 and A20 and the DC200s is compatible with the A30 and A40.

cryssi

08-28-2007, 09:52 AM

weird. I don't know. I have an sd600, so I bought that particular canon housing off b&h.

DznyFan

08-28-2007, 10:19 AM

You might also try some of the scuba equipment sites - leisurepro.com has a huge selection of housings, but check scuba.com and scubatoys.com as well. If scubatoys.com does not have it on their website, try calling them - their prices are usually the best, their customer service can't be beat, and often they have stock that is not on their website.

Schachteles

01-21-2008, 10:42 AM

Ok, so I convinced my DH right before our trip in October that we needed a Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi 10.1MP Digital SLR Camera, we LOVE it and cannot imagine life without it.

Now we are getting ready to head on the Disney Cruise in November and I am concerned about bring that camera out on excursions, like Castaway Cay, because it could be stolen or get wet.

So now I have approached my DH for another camera...LOL :rotfl2:...he seemed ok when I told him about these really cool waterproof digital cameras. We could use it at the beach, IN the water, snorkling and all that fun stuff. He seems really keen now on getting one.

Can anyone give me a suggestion on which one to get?!? THANKS!!

rtphokie

01-21-2008, 11:09 AM

Do you have another digital camera? If so, consider getting a waterproof bag for that one. Aquapac makes some decent ones for between $25-$40 depending on the size. Hard cases are also another option but they start at over $100.

Aquapac also makes an SLR sized bag for about $115. Personally, I'll trust a bag to my older Canon G3 but not to my SLR.

Schachteles

01-21-2008, 11:13 AM

donaldduck1967

01-21-2008, 01:19 PM

You don't say how much your'e looking to spend. Olympus has some waterproof cameras.

http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/cpg_digital_sw.asp

Schachteles

01-21-2008, 01:29 PM

Someone on the Cruise boards suggested the 770 Olympus, so I am thinking that will probably what we will get.

It is hard, I likely will still bring out the expensive camera because I will want to get pictures with that too.

Groucho

01-21-2008, 09:37 PM

Olympus and Pentax are the big players. I haven't done a lot of research but Pentax has been chosen by some of the regulars here (Mark B, I think Gdad, and a few others.) It sounds like by and large, they're pretty comparable. Too bad the search functionality is all busted here, there have been some informative threads in the past about them. :)

Suzann

01-22-2008, 10:58 AM

I've had the pentax waterproof camera and the Olympus now too. I do prefer the picture that Pentax takes, but their latest camera is having problems with it being waterproof (read reviews on amazon) So I bought the Olympus. The Olympus is great with sunny shots, but once its a little dark, the flash fires off too brightly and the noise on the shots is just incredibly bad. Thankfully this is just a camera to bring along to take random pictures when its raining, or hiking in the snow, what have you.

SueInBoston

01-22-2008, 11:21 AM

I have an older model Pentax -W10, I think...

It's a great little camera, took it on many snorkleing trips and the pictures are beautiful.

I also have an Rebel and took it to Castaway Cay last April as well, But I really used my waterproof Pentax alot more.

Schachteles

01-22-2008, 11:39 AM

Of course everyone has their own opinions about them...someone on the cruise boards mentioned that the Pentex didn't take as nice of pictures. GRRR!! I like it when there is ONE simple answer!

SharonLowe

01-22-2008, 12:06 PM

I got the Canon G9 with a waterproof case for snorkeling but that isn't as small and easy to carry around as one of the Olympus or Pentax models. It is a really nice camera though and in the case, it can stay under longer (and go deeper) than the Olympus and Pentax models.

extreme8

01-22-2008, 12:17 PM

I've got the Optio W-10 and have been very happy with it.
It works fine under water and I'm not afraid to take it anywhere. I've gotten fun shots in places I never would have taken my D200.
Remember, it's not just waterproof but dirt and sand proof as well. Drop it in the sand and you only need to rinse it off before you toss it back in your pocket.

I guess only you can decide if the quality is what you're looking for.
I happen to have these in my Photobucket account, if you'd like to see more samples before making a decision please let me know.

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n130/bpantani/water.jpg

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n130/bpantani/IMGP0650.jpg

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n130/bpantani/IMGP0619.jpg

And one of a more normal subject (from the pool, BTW)
http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n130/bpantani/flower.jpg

SueInBoston

01-22-2008, 12:40 PM

I found some Pentax W10 pics in my photobucket account too:

edited...sorry, can't the picture to show.

webshark3

01-22-2008, 03:48 PM

My Pentax OptioWP is my regular companion for my Disney trips. It makes a great backup camera to my DSLR. IQ is good outdoors, and so-so indoors, but great for play around water and in the rain. I'd look at the Oly if I were you becuase it's not only water and shookproof, but also has ANOTHER enternal housing for deeper dives.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y20/webshark3/IMGP4512.jpg

Jeanne B

02-01-2008, 09:07 PM

Some of you may have read my recent experience with my failed A610 (with the known ccd problem that Canon refuses to acknowledge on the A610 model) so now I'm trying to figure out how to replace our u/w setup before our cruise next month. I know I said I absolutely would not buy another Canon but I love the picture quality of the A series cameras (while they last, that is:rolleyes1 ) so I'm thinking about selling my A610 housing on ebay and buying the A720IS with it's matching housing OR the recently announced Olympus 1030SW which is waterproof to 33 ft and shockproof and freezeproof (we're snowmobilers so this would be good to use during the winter months also). I'm not thrilled about the XD cards though and it only has 3.6x zoom vs 6x with the A720. It doesn't take AA's but I can live with that and I'm guessing at 10mp and a 1/2.33 sensor the picture quality wouldn't be as good as the A720 but I like the fact that it would be a lot less bulky than a camera and housing. I thought about buying a used A620 on ebay so we could use it with our current housing but for about $70 more I could have a brand new A720 with a 1-yr warranty (I would then sell our housing and buy the matching housing for the A720). I've read about some of the Olympus u/w models having waterproofing problems which makes me a bit nervous but considering I have a useless A610 with less than 2000 shots taken with it I don't know that I can give Canon the upper-hand when it comes to quality.

Here's the dpreview links to both cameras...

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/canon_a720is.asp

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0801/08012202olyswseries.asp

And here's a link to the 1030SW on the Olympus website...

http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1363

Of course, the other issue is whether or not I could even get the Olympus in time...we cruise 3/2 and it's not available on Amazon until April but Adorama is showing them as available (I don't know that I trust the website though as all others are showing "available soon").

DueyDooDah

02-01-2008, 09:18 PM

Well, as a SCUBA diver, I would have to go with the housing. Although they take a bit more work to ensure no water gets in, I need the depth they provide. I also use them when it's raining or in conditions I think might cause problems with my gear. I currently have a housing for my Canon Powershot S80, which I use exclusively for diving since I got the 30D.

I have owned alot of Canon gear, starting way back in the '70s with my F1. I have never had an issue with any of it. I am sorry you had a bad experience with yours. If you go the Canon route, I hope you fair better than with your A610.

SharonLowe

02-02-2008, 06:25 AM

I love my Canon G9 with underwater housing. It is a super camera (though not terribly wide) and takes great videos too if that is something you would like. Yes, it requires a housing so becomes bulky but it will also be a great camera on land without the housing.

ukcatfan

02-02-2008, 09:25 AM

I normally do not defend Canon too much, but I do like their stuff. I know that it is very tough for you being in the situation where your sensor is going bad, but it is not Canon refusing to include that model in the recall. The only cameras on the recall are ones with sensors recalled by Sony. IMO if you want to blame someone, blame them. Every electronic has an expected failure rate. This model seems to be above average, but it still might be within accepted tolerable limits for the industry. It also went past the warranty period, so to Canon, it completely meet its legal obligations to you. I just do not think you should rate their entire brand based on this one bad experience. Also, be sure to keep it as Sony could add that sensor to the recall.

I personally would go for the A720 just because the UW housing is going to be more reliable and useful than the camera made with it. I do believe that the Oly will have at least as nice IQ though b/c it does have a newer and larger sensor. I would not consider the zoom in the decision though b/c it is unlikely more than 3x zoom will be effective underwater.

One last thing, Pentax also makes UW cameras.

Kevin

Schachteles

02-02-2008, 10:11 AM

Olympus is releasing the Olympus 1030SW on April 1st...it looks really cool.

ukcatfan

02-02-2008, 10:49 AM

I want an actual waterproof camera that we can bring into the water. We have a waterproof bag for our SLR already. I just want something that we can get pictures with the girls in the water, with the dolphins, stinkrays, etc.

Nothing personal b/c I make typos all the time, but this was so funny to me that I almost fell out of my chair. Watch out for the stinkrays, they smell like fish! Thank you for the laugh. :)

Kevin

Jeanne B

02-02-2008, 11:00 AM

It also went past the warranty period, so to Canon, it completely meet its legal obligations to you. I just do not think you should rate their entire brand based on this one bad experience. Also, be sure to keep it as Sony could add that sensor to the recall.

I know they met their legal obligations, it's just frustrating seeing so many other cases on the internet in which people are having the exact same problem with their A610's as is described in the service advisory. I received my camera back from the Canon repair center last week and I'm definitely hanging onto it in case they ever add the A610 to the list and maybe I need to send my complaint letter to both Canon AND Sony.:teeth:

I personally would go for the A720 just because the UW housing is going to be more reliable and useful than the camera made with it. I do believe that the Oly will have at least as nice IQ though b/c it does have a newer and larger sensor. I would not consider the zoom in the decision though b/c it is unlikely more than 3x zoom will be effective underwater.

Your statement and DueyDooDah's is exactly why I'm leaning more towards the A720 and in spite of my bad experience with Canon I've been very happy with the IQ of the A series line and the extra zoom is attractive to me for those times we're using it on land rather than u/w. I ordered the A720 on Amazon earlier in the week for $195 and it's supposed to ship Monday but I started second guessing myself last night:scared:after taking a second look at the latest Olympus model.

Sharon - I have a Pentax dSLR that I use primarily for land shots so for me the G9 really isn't an option based on it's price. I'm looking for a less expensive set up for u/w use as well as a backup for those times I don't want to carry around the bulky dSLR but I appreciate the suggestion!!;)

smnornes

02-05-2008, 02:19 PM

I normally use a digital Rebel for everyday photography, but have been wanting to purchase a smaller camera to use when I don't want to lug the "big" one with. I still want nice quality prints... no larger than 8x10 and a zoom would be nice, but what I really want is something that I can take snorkeling with me, so something that will come with a waterproof housing. Someone recommended an Olympus D580 with the waterproof housing, said they picked up the whole package on ebay for about $150. I don't think I want to spend more that $200 on the whole thing. Does anyone have any recommendations? Thank you in advance!

DueyDooDah

02-05-2008, 03:17 PM

I'm not sure you can get a camera with a housing for that price but I think there are "waterproof" cameras that might fit the bill. I can't make a suggestion on any though, sorry. I have a housing with my P&S (I SCUBA so need something that goes a bit deeper) and did not investigate other types of cameras.

MarkBarbieri

02-05-2008, 09:47 PM

Olympus and Pentax both make waterproof p&s cameras, but they are both in the mid $200 range. You might be able to pick up a used one for a little less than that.

extreme8

02-06-2008, 10:01 AM

As I've said here before, I really like my Pentax Optio W10 as a "no worries" knock around P&S.
It's waterproof to 10 feet or so, and the IQ is actually pretty good.
Amazon has 'em for $188, and other places online are less, but check out any vendor you're not familiar with on reseller ratings first.

pyrxtc

02-06-2008, 10:18 AM

olympus 77sw OR THE 1030 sw. They are both waterproof to 33 ft. The 1030 has more features that you may never need to use and cost more and the 770 but not much more. I have the 770 and have been very happy with it. Would probably get the 1030 for my DD for x-mas next year.

770 is 7.1 MP and the 1030 is 10.1 MP

smnornes

02-07-2008, 06:57 AM

great! Thank you for taking the time to reply! I'll check these suggestions out.

MarkBarbieri

02-19-2008, 09:48 PM

I was looking for a slightly larger backpack to replace my Lowepro Minitrekker AW (which I really like) and discovered that Lowepro now makes a "waterproof" backpack. They actually make three - Dryzone 100, Dryzone 200 (http://products.lowepro.com/product/DryZone-200,1935,18.htm), and Dryzone Rover.

It's definitely overkill for a rainy day. For me, it will replace the bulky and uncomfortable Pelican case on canoe and kayak outings. I don't think it's waterproof enough to withstand a series maytagging in some monster rapids, but it should do well enough for something as simple a canoe capsizing on a lazy river or being dropped into the water while loading the boat. If you spend time on water or in very wet environments, you might consider one of these. I ordered mine tonight. If anyone is interested, I'll post some comments after I've had a chance to play with it (and fill it with rocks and drop it in the pool).

starrock77

03-20-2008, 07:27 AM

SharonLowe

03-20-2008, 10:12 AM

I used a couple Kodak underwater one time use cameras at Discovery Cove and wanted to know where would be the best place to have them developed. I know they only produce so so results so I was looking for something better then Walgreens or Walmart type places. Any suggestions?

Thanks

I've used a dive shop that uses this service:

http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/consumer/sea/index.shtml

look for a dealer in your area or see if someone will let you mail it in. They do look better than "normal"

rtphokie

03-20-2008, 04:56 PM

I've used a dive shop that uses this service:

http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/consumer/sea/index.shtml

look for a dealer in your area or see if someone will let you mail it in. They do look better than "normal"

The problem with underwater photos is the blue-green cast they have. You can get some pretty good results in Photoshop via the average filter in an overlay layer:

quick instrucitons here (http://www.graphics.com/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=178)

SharonLowe

03-21-2008, 06:17 AM

The problem with underwater photos is the blue-green cast they have. You can get some pretty good results in Photoshop via the average filter in an overlay layer:

quick instrucitons here (http://www.graphics.com/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=178)

The special kodak process gets rid of the blue cast and means no time wasted on redoing the images. Plus, the prints you get are the correct color so you can use them rather than having to pay for prints that will just get tossed in the can.

starrock77

03-24-2008, 11:04 AM

Thanks for both posts. I think I will try to use the Kodak processing.

rtphokie

03-24-2008, 11:52 AM

The special kodak process gets rid of the blue cast and means no time wasted on redoing the images. Plus, the prints you get are the correct color so you can use them rather than having to pay for prints that will just get tossed in the can.

What are these "prints" people keep talking about? Is that a special kind of digital file format?:)

dreamscometrue

03-25-2008, 09:47 PM

I am looking to get a waterproof digital camera for my birthday. My DH has a Panasonic digital with a 12X optical zoom. I am getting tired of always taking a bigger camera everywhere. My DD has a small Samsung. It takes great shots but I am hoping to get my own which will be somewhere between the two. I know I have seen a waterproof digital advertised somewhere. I think it was an Olympus. Anyone have a waterproof digital?? Any information pros/cons would be appreciated. I guess I would like the best of all worlds in a smaller camera-- particularly waterproof with a larger zoom. Thanks so much for any input you can share.

Have a great day!!!:)

Alacrity

03-26-2008, 08:46 AM

You might look at a housing for an existing camera. Many of the manufacturer now make housings for popular models. There are also a number of third party housing makers and a few "water-proof" cameras. You might look at reefmaster/Sealife and Sea and Sea. Both have housing and camera sets they sell and water-proof cameras. Ikelite is a company that makes housings for many cameras and there are others. You might looks at http://digideep.com; that site lists cameras and housings that may be available.

Some of these are designed for scuba and may be overkill but there are many options that may do what you are looking for.

TinksDH

03-26-2008, 09:09 AM

Here are a couple of threads discussing waterproof cameras from the past few months:

http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=1694846

http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=1748111

http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=1744342

tiff13

03-26-2008, 11:13 AM

I just got an Olympus Stylus 790
Here are a few pics I took last week with it. Haven't used it in water yet, but have dropped it a couple times, used it in the sand, and still working great.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2124/2352297951_e0b59ddc13.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3149/2353088392_d6ee0f00bf.jpghttp://farm4.static.flickr.com/3067/2352270617_d5eaeb61a7.jpg

I also have a Canon S3, and it was so nice not having to worry about carrying a bigger camera around and damaging it. I was worried about the quality of the pics but I'm pretty satisified. If you are interested in more examples, theres a link in my sig.

nikkistevej

03-26-2008, 11:42 AM

Zoesmama03

03-27-2008, 12:04 AM

One that comes to mind is the Pentex Optio I think it is. I think of it because someday I'd love to get one for the fully underwater option. But check out dpreview they might have some reviews on some.

http://www.h20camera.com/camera/w30

dixie lolly

03-28-2008, 09:52 AM

:flower1: :butterfly :daisy: I have an olympus stylus 790sw and it is a great camera for being waterproof. i originally had the same type but it was only splashproof and when we went on our cruise they had this one for the same price as the first one i had. Anway i bought it so we could take some pics while diving and it is great. They are around 300.00 but i thought it was a good deal considering the ones that arent waterproof are close to that price. i will be glad to answer any quesyions u have. hope this helps.:thumbsup2

Gdad

03-28-2008, 11:58 AM

I have a Petax W30- love it.

http://www.capturelifeinaction.com/photos/127630595_sZVbg-L.jpg

dreamscometrue

03-28-2008, 02:52 PM

Thanks so much for all of your responses. I have been researching around and think I have decided to not go with a waterproof camera afterall. I don't even go under water so the truth is my DH and DD and DS would actually be using it for the under water shots. LOL I thought it would be nice to not worry about a camera getting wet when taking pictures of the kids by the ocean or splashing when I am near the pool, but for the most part I am looking for a small point and shoot with a decent zoom~~ Waterproof was a plus that I wouldn't be using. Granted it would be great for DH to take shots while snorkling at Castaway this summer, but..................... IT'S MY BIRTHDAY PRESENT!!!LOL LOL

My research currently has me between the Canon A720 which has a 6X zoom and a Canon SX100 which has a 10X zoom. The SX is a bit larger to tote around but I am dreaming of how great the larger zoom would be. (Still not as big as my DH's Panasonic DMC FZ30 which has a 12X zoom but doesn't just slip into a pocket) Any input on these 2 Canon's would be appreciated. I would love to go and get it this weekend!!!

DisneySuiteFreak

03-29-2008, 09:06 AM

I have a Petax W30- love it.
Gdad, how is the shutter lag on this camera? I was thinking about it for a possible WDW water park trip. Are the batteries proprietary? What kind of memory card does it use? Does it have any kind of backlighting type compensation for pictures in bright sun? Thanks!

msr709

04-14-2008, 02:09 PM

Has anyone had any experience with these? I just bought one for my Sony Cybershot and was just curious if anyone here has used them and what the feedback would be? TIA :thumbsup2

Laxmom

05-17-2008, 12:39 PM

My2Girls66

05-18-2008, 10:56 AM

I bought a Sealife Reefmaster Ecoshot not too long ago to take pictures while diving and snorkeling. It looks exactly the same as that Vivitar- down to the buttons! I thought it took some nice photos while snorkeling in the Turks and Caicos a few weeks ago. I got much better pictures with it than I did with the disposables I used at Discovery Cove a few years ago. It did well above water, too.
http://www.sealife-cameras.com/cameras/ecoshot.html
http://www.amazon.com/SeaLife-SL321-ECOshot-Digital-Camera/dp/B000KJBS0M/ref=pd_bbs_3?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1211126504&sr=8-3
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/SusieW/Provo%2008/PICT00682008-05-01.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/SusieW/Provo%2008/PICT00932008-04-28.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/SusieW/Provo%2008/PICT00962008-04-28.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/SusieW/Provo%2008/PICT01392008-04-28.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/SusieW/Provo%2008/PICT00502008-04-26.jpg

My2Girls66

05-18-2008, 11:03 AM

Just an added note or 2. They don't have viewfinders and I did have a hard time seeing exactly what I was shooting thru the screen some of the time- between the bit of fog in my mask and the reflection off the screen. I just held it out in front of myself and snapped away hoping I was aiming at what I wanted in the photo. I seem to have done pretty well most of the time. Next time I'll practice ahead of time exactly where I should hold it to get what I want in the shot.
Also, look at the depth rating and what depth you may need. The Vivitar is rated to 30'- the Ecoshot to 75' and the Reefmaster Mini to 130'. I took the scuba course last month but haven't done the open water part yet for my certification(living in NH the ocean is cold and rough) but since I doubt I'll be going deeper than 30'-40' when I do, I decided on the Ecoshot. Since it looks like you dive, you may want to go beyond the 30' rating of the Vivitar- the Ecoshot might be a better one for you. Strictly snorkeling and very shallow diving the Vivitar would be fine. Good luck:)

Laxmom

05-18-2008, 11:13 AM

Those are really great photos. Much better than the disposables. You're right, it does look just like the Vivitar. The same company must make both. I will compare the specs on both and decide from there; there is a pretty good price difference.

Thanks for the info!!

My2Girls66

05-18-2008, 11:48 AM

It makes a great beach camera, also. You don't have to worry about sand, water, spray and the picture quality was very good. Its also shockproof from 6' if it gets dropped. Its pretty rugged. I have a D50 that rarely sees the beach. When we went to the islands I brought the D50 to the beach for family shots and scenic shots then ran it back to the condo. I carried the Ecoshot on beach walks- if I wanted to go in the water it came in with me. It was great. I got shots with it I never would have gotten with a regular camera. One was the rain bouncing off the water at water level- the beach from the water.

Laxmom

05-18-2008, 12:12 PM

We have the D50 also. DS plays lacrosse and it was a wet season. We didn't get many shots this year. This would be great for that too.

MarkBarbieri

05-18-2008, 02:30 PM

I am hoping you guys can help me with a question. We aren't serious photographers but we love taking walks on vacation just looking for shots. We currently use a Nikon D50 that we love.

We have always bought disposable underwater cameras for our diving or snorkeling with mixed results. We don't do it often enough to make a large investment. I found a 6 mp Vivitar with a 4x digital zoom that would probably fill the bill for us; Vivicam 6200W.

Since the disposables are film cameras, there isn't a way to guage the equivalent mp, right? Just curious if we can expect better pictures with the Vivitar or if you guys have another suggestion.

Thanks for you help

It's hard to equate film to megapixels. Megapixels are arranged in an orderly pattern and are all the same size. Film is composed of grains that very in size and pattern. There is great variation between films as well. A piece of 35mm film has somewhere between 3 and 24 megapixels (I've seen estimates that low and that high).

For underwater shooting, I think you have 5 major choices these days:

1) Underwater disposables
2) Underwater point & shoots (Pentax W30, Olympus 790SW)
3) Regular point & shoot with underwater housing
4) DSLR with EWA Marine type bag
5) DSLR with underwater housing

The last is ideal except that the price is outrageous. I've used an EWA Marine bag with decent results on my DSLR (see here (http://photos.barbierifamily.org/gallery/1859532_p4JNU#93371148_uCuUe)), but I don't really trust the bag. I wouldn't use one far from shore or with a camera that I valued.

Our current solutions are an underwater point & shoot (Pentax W30), which gives marginally acceptable results (see here (http://photos.barbierifamily.org/gallery/3013324_Neurj#P-3-12)) and a regular point and shoot (Canon G9) with an underwater housing (http://photos.barbierifamily.org/gallery/3013324_Neurj#P-3-12). The housing was only $170, so it wasn't a huge commitment.

If you are going to go diving, you'll want something that is weighted so that it is neutrally buoyant.

Laxmom

05-18-2008, 03:53 PM

Yea, there is no way I would take my D50 in the water. I just couldn't relax and trust the housing. I do have an G9 that I could look for a housing for also. I just am tired of the disposables. I am spoiled with digital. The last 2 times we have used a disposable, we ended up with a couple decent shots out of 24, hardly worth it.

Thanks for the info guys. Exactly what I was looking for.

alan

05-19-2008, 07:17 AM

Just in case anybody here who is UK-based is is interested, I have some sample snaps from a cheap digital camera I bought at Asda.

The camera is a Vivtar Vivicam 5399; it has a fixed focal-length lens and comes with a waterproof case that claims 15m waterproofness (!) It is a 5Mpxel fellow, and takes SD cards. There is no built-in flash. It claims to do video too, 640x480 at 30fps. The price is £39.00!

The picture quality obviously is not as good as a "real" digital camera. But I can take it to the beach and not really care if it gets dropped, covered in sand or taken into the pool. And if I have to leave it unattended at the beach, it's not a £250 camera in a £150 housing.

Anyway, on to the pictures. Not terribly inspiring, just snaps taken outside my office.

1. A tree
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3180/2505470976_fea1c56c44.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/atp/2505470976/)

2. A bit of building
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2186/2504641325_17a5f10b77.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/atp/2504641325/)

3. My feet!
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2176/2504641605_010c570bf7.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/atp/2504641605/)

Clciking the links takes you to a Flickr page where you can download the full-size originals to see what you think; I'll add some video when I get a chance.

regards,
/alan

nicurn

05-27-2008, 12:03 PM

hey guys, I bought the intova with underwater housing because I figure how often will I really use it. anyhow, took it to key largo, it works well, but the case tended to fog up? how do you prevent that? maggie

ps: my favourite picture from the weekend

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c34/vafeismom/spottedeaglestingray.jpg

The Grays

05-27-2008, 02:57 PM

There is some glass cleaner for optics that is a fog resistant. The other way is to try and give it some time to get to the same temp or get a few of that silics jell packs and put in the housing and see if that would help.

DixieDolphin

05-27-2008, 03:16 PM

Spit always works for the inside of your mask, so why not your housing! ;) JUST KIDDING (please don't do this).

Silica gel packs are a big help. I used to get them free at my local music store, as they came by the hundreds in boxes of instruments they'd receive.

Be careful about any anti-fog juice you put on the housing, as some types of plastic will corrode or haze when in contact with certain chemicals. Always be sure that your defog solution is compatible with your housing.

Definitely acclimate it slowly to a new temperature. Fogging generally occurs when taking a camera from one temperature extreme to the other. (This can also occur inside your camera lenses, actually... I've had my camera lenses fog up when walking into summer heat from an A/C room.)

And that's a lovely image of an eagle ray! Good stuff. =)

alanapapa

06-02-2008, 05:55 PM

Hi,
I need help and so I come to the one place I am sure of getting people to help, THE DIS.

We have a Kodak C615 digital and we love it except that there is no viewfinder, just a LCD screen, which when out in sunlight you can't see anything. We are going on the EB REPO cruise in August, plus both DD are in Girls Scouts and we canoe, kayak and camp. We are looking for a camera we can use while onboard ship and while canoeing/kayaking that has a veiwfinder. We don't want to spend more than $250.00 (175.00 if possible). Any suggestions?

ukcatfan

06-02-2008, 06:49 PM

Have you considered getting a camera you like and an Aquapac? It does not sound like you have that many needs for a true waterproof model.

labdogs42

06-28-2008, 10:38 AM

I'd like to get some kind of waterproofing device for one of my cameras. I have a Fuji Finepix v10 compact camera and a Canon 20D dSLR. I'd just like to be able to take a few underwater pictures or pictures in the pool, nothing too fancy. So, I could go either way on which camera I want to use. Any suggestions for waterproofing devices? I won't be going scuba diving with these, snorkeling maybe, but not scuba diving. Thanks!

My2Girls66

06-28-2008, 03:42 PM

Underwater housing are quite expensive for Dslr's. For underwater photos I ended up buying a SeaLife Reefmaster Ecoshot. I really like it and my DD's take it to the beach and pool- no worries. We bought it for diving and snorkeling. It was around $180. Vivitar makes a very similar one for $119(good to 30'- the Reefmaster is good to 75').
An inexpensive option- a friend of mine used for her Kodak Z712- is an Aquapac from LLBean. Around $45 for the large- $30 for a medium. I have a smaller one that would fit a compact p&s(tho, I've never submerged my camera in it).
here are some options.
http://www.keepitdrycase.com/wadicacadc.html
http://www.amazon.com/SeaLife-SL321-ECOshot-Digital-Camera/dp/B000KJBS0M/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=photo&qid=1214689789&sr=1-1
http://www.amazon.com/Vivitar-VIVICAM-6200W-MegaPixel-Underwater-Digital/dp/B000QCI65I/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=photo&qid=1214689789&sr=1-3
http://www.llbean.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?page=aquapac-compact-camera-case&categoryId=49838&storeId=1&catalogId=1&langId=-1&parentCategory=3922&cat4=8281&shop_method=pp&feat=3922-tn&np=Y
http://www.llbean.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?page=aquapac-camera-case&categoryId=49835&storeId=1&catalogId=1&langId=-1&parentCategory=3922&cat4=8281&shop_method=pp&feat=3922-tn&np=Y

My2Girls66

06-28-2008, 03:58 PM

20D housing options
http://www.adorama.com/IK687120.html
http://www.adorama.com/EWDCA1D.html

thomas998

06-29-2008, 08:35 AM

if you aren't looking for hard core diving equipment just find an underwater for the point and shoot.... getting one for the DSLR would be over kill. Odds are you wont use it that much, and if your point and shoot is like most it will also be capable of doing video which is probably more useful in your trying to shoot the kids playing in water.

MarkBarbieri

06-29-2008, 08:54 AM

I've tried three different approaches - Ewa Marine bag for a DSLR (Canon 10D), dedicated underwater p&s (Pentax W30), and p&S shoot in a hard shell housing (Canon G9). Each has their limitations.

I've always had problems with the EWA marine bag leaking. Not a lot and not very fast, but enough to make me nervous and only use it with my backup camera. I see it as a better tool for when you are dorking about on the water and not actually going under the surface. It's cumbersome as well, so I don't do anything but point and shoot while using it - no zooming, no adjusting parameters. On the positive side, it gives me much better picture quality than the P&S cameras.

http://photos.barbierifamily.org/photos/93371143_Vq2yx-L.jpg

See more shots taken with the 10D in the Ewa Marine housing here (http://photos.barbierifamily.org/gallery/1859532_p4JNU#93371148_uCuUe).

The Pentax W30 was disappointing to me for it's mediocre picture quality and lousy controls. It gets the job done, but I don't enjoy using it and I'm not impressed with the results. On the other hand, it's the only one that is really easy to use and adjust in the water. We had some electronics problems (wouldn't stay powered on) with ours, but I haven't seen a lot of reports of similar problems and we eventually got it fixed right.

http://photos.barbierifamily.org/photos/163598009_LeMhT-L.jpg

See more Pentax W30 shots here (http://photos.barbierifamily.org/gallery/3013324_Neurj#163597470_L37GG).

The G9 is considered to be one of the better point and shoot cameras. That doesn't say much for the p&s world. It's a clear step up from the W30 in IQ and controls, but the gap between them is much narrower than the gap between the G9 and my 5 year old 10D.

The housing for the G9 makes it even more waterproof than the W30 but it also makes it bulky. You can control all of the controls, but it is much harder because you have to see the everything through the clear plastic housing. It renders the viewfinder (of marginal use to begin with) useless and partially obstructs the flash as well. One other issue that I discovered is that the camera gets extremely hot inside the shell on a hot, sunny day. It was painful to touch when I opened the shell.

http://photos.barbierifamily.org/photos/321938659_wZebt-L.jpg

See other G9 shots in the Canon waterproof housing here (http://photos.barbierifamily.org/gallery/5283303_i7Ttg#321935619_NHdGB).

boBQuincy

06-29-2008, 11:08 AM

I use a EWA bag for my P&S and it works ok. The SLR models look unwieldy and if Mark reports they leak a little then I don't care to try one. The P&S model (for Canon G) has not leaked yet but I don't go under water much. It is great protection for on the beach or in a boat (especially around salt water).

http://bob.suzieandbob.com/vehicles/boat_3095.jpg

polkadotladybug

07-08-2008, 09:43 AM

Does anyone have any recommendations for any underwater/waterproof casing for the Canon S5 (or similar sized bridge cameras)? I'd love to have a safe means of taking my camera around the water without being ultra paranoid of dropping it or even the seaspray getting on the lens.

I googled and found some over 200 bucks and I'm not looking to spend that much! Wanted to ask those who have actually bought and used them.

Thanks in advance!

Dizzyworld

07-27-2008, 12:05 PM

Does anyone have advice or experience for Underwater Camera Housing for Canon cameras?

We're thinking of getting a Canon A720 IS and the underwater camera house (if I can find one ASAP) for an upcoming trip. We're tired of film disposable underwater cameras.

Thanks for all help in advance.

MarkBarbieri

07-27-2008, 12:16 PM

Here (http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=1870086)is a recent thread on the topic of underwater housings. I have a housing for our Canon G9. It works well. The only issue that I have had with it is that the camera can get very hot inside of it. A black metal camera inside of a clear plastic case isn't the best design for minimizing heat gain. Still, that didn't cause any problems other than making the camera hard to hold for several minutes after I took it out.

The biggest challenge with underwater housings when not shooting underwater is water droplets on your lens. If you are in the water, you probably won't have anything dry to wipe the lens off with. If you shoot with water drops on the lens, they'll create big, fuzzy blobs on your pictures. I wipe the lens as best I can with whatever is handy and then try to blow the remaining water off. It doesn't work well. I'm considering swimming with a squeegee or maybe a chamois.