View Full Version : astronomical photos
rtphokie
10-14-2010, 10:21 PM
Not strictly Disney but you can see these from any Disney park ;)
No telescope this time, just my Canon 100mm-300mm lens. It's pretty amazing the detail you can get on a clear night.
http://rtphokie.smugmug.com/Photography/astronomy/IMG1928/1048316762_TBrUm-O.jpg
ISO 1600, f/9 1/1000s, 300mm
http://rtphokie.smugmug.com/Photography/astronomy/IMG1945/1048316775_gUmzq-O.jpg
left to right:
Callisto, Ganymede, Jupiter, Io
ISO 100, f/9 2s, 300mm
http://rtphokie.smugmug.com/Photography/astronomy/1048316868tyotS/1048366105_YRCcW-X2.jpg
Cassiopeia constellation, the top most star, Beta Cas was cropped out.
ISO 100, f/9 6s, 300mm
Nice pics.
I didn't realize there was a star called "dead pixel".
I have done a little bit of reading and do want to take some star pictures. From what I have read you might benefit from opening the lens wider and exposing for the same duration. The stars will be more obvious. The alternative would be using a larger aperture and lesser ISO for clearer shots. Keep in mind the DOF when focused at infinity is rather large ;)
Experiment_626
10-15-2010, 07:40 AM
I didn't realize there was a star called "dead pixel".I knew that International Star Registry thing would turn around and bite us! ;)
::abdo::
10-15-2010, 09:25 AM
good
tnx
Marlton Mom
10-15-2010, 09:52 AM
Nice pix!
If B and H is listening :santa:, I'd like one of those tracking tripods for my Nikon D90. Those darn planets just keep moving out of my frame when I try to shoot! ;)
Great job with a quickly moving target! :goodvibes
Marlton Mom
zackiedawg
10-15-2010, 10:02 AM
I've done the same myself, with my Tamron 200-500mm lens - just backyard, handheld stuff for fun. I will admit to knowing nothing about the identification of astral bodies, so I pretty much just point at the big shiny objects and see what I can get. The moon and several of the obvious planets is about as deep as my knowledge gets. Here are a few:
Dusk moon:
http://www.pbase.com/zackiedawg/image/119807683/original.jpg
Crescent moon, Venus, and Jupiter (with some of the moons visible):
http://www.pbase.com/zackiedawg/image/106663722/original.jpg
Big 'ol moon:
http://www.pbase.com/zackiedawg/image/98944331/original.jpg
Daytime moon:
http://www.pbase.com/zackiedawg/image/95700216/original.jpg
Jupiter and 4 moons (and I can't name or identify them!):
http://www.pbase.com/zackiedawg/image/98944330/original.jpg
Progression of a 2008 eclipse, taken with my superzoom in multiple frames:
http://www.pbase.com/zackiedawg/image/93232696/original.jpg
KYCruiseCrazy
10-15-2010, 11:51 AM
:worship::worship::worship: More please:surfweb:
rtphokie
10-15-2010, 12:36 PM
Crescent moon, Venus, and Jupiter (with some of the moons visible):
If the date in the EXIF data is right (and it appears to be), thats Ganymede on the left and Callisto on the right. That might be a blur or it might be Europa right under Ganymede.
Jupiter and 4 moons (and I can't name or identify them!):
Ganymede, Io, Jupiter, Europa, Calisto
You can do the math or your can download Stellarium (http://www.stellarium.org/), set the clock, find Jupiter and zoom in to see the moons and their names.
zackiedawg
10-15-2010, 01:14 PM
Be sure to enable satellites and update them from time to time. It can be useful for answering the "what was that" questions.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.