Why does everyone want CRV DVC?

[Mtnman44]

Ok, please help me understand why there seems to be all this demand for DVC at the contemporary resort. I've never stayed there but it does look kinds plain there. No theming, no real landscaping and grounds to speak of. VWL is practicallly a stones throw away with much more resort feel and amenties I would think. Yea, Yea contemporary has a monorail station but is that REALLY why everyone wants it?

[Fitswimmer]

never underestimate the power of the monorail.....

[LilMamiBella]

Well for me cr is not very appealing..i like the restaurants though and the monorail of course but I probably wouldn't buy there. I would probably try and use my points to stay there or if I were to buy it would be the smallest point contract available. Really, I'd rather buy at poly dvc or grand floridian dvc..but that may never happen.

[DVCconvert]

1 - Ability to walk to the Magic Kingdom

2 - Monorail

[greenban]

I hate to disagree but.......

I like the fact that there used to be asbestos in the building. As I get old and die, I want my heirs to be able to sue Disney.

Is there anything really wrong with that?

It's not like I carry grapes around in my pocket to throw onto a floor and slip upon, hmmmmm That's actually a promising idea.......

Location, Location, Location and did I mention Location?

Plus their mass transit is outta this world!

-Tony

[lenshanem]

I'm not a fan of the lack of theming there either, but monorail access, sidewalk to MK, MK views... :thumbsup2

If you've walked from BCV or BWV over to Epcot you know the power of location, location, location!

[FriendsOfEeyore]

1 - Ability to walk to the Magic Kingdom

2 - Monorail

Umm, yeah those would be the main reasons.

[Mama2Matthew]

1 - Ability to walk to the Magic Kingdom

2 - Monorail

Agreed! We like having access to the parks other than the buses. DH and I both love BWV, but won't buy there because of the earlier expiration. We're only in our twenties and want those extra years. We will definitely buy-in at the CRV- especially if they continue the trend of extending the expiration date for the new resorts as with AKV. :banana:

[dkostel]

This is the resort that will get me to buy DVC. Personally, it is a sentimental fav, because I went in the 70s when I was a kid and always wished we could stay at the CR or Poly instead of schlepping to and from the Days Inn Kissimmee. Aside from that, proximity to the MK, great restaurants, best selection of watersports in all of Disney and of course the monorail goes right through it!

[keys2kingdom]

I think the CR in general holds a lot of nostalgic memories for lots of people, since it was one of the original resorts many people remember staying there as kids and that may be some of the appeal. Personally I don't have any interest in CRV DVC but then again I wasn't lucky enough to have stayed there as a kid.

[mlill]

You're all forgetting being able to walk to California Grill, one of the best restaurants on property. For me, that's in the top 5 reasons to add-on there.

1. Magic Kingdom/Fireworks view

2. Walkway to MK

3. Monorail to MK - plus easy access to other Monorail resorts for dinner.

4. California Grill right upstairs - or down the hall from the DVC building! LOL!

5. Marina/watercraft rental for Seven Seas Lagoon & Bay Lake

-Michelle

[dianeschlicht]

I have no idea why you would assume everyone wants a DVC at CR! I for one can guarantee you I will NEVER be staying there if they do! The CR holds nothing to intrigue me at all, and being near MK is not a plus for me either.

I have been very excited about AKV though! So glad DVC is doing AKV!!!

[TomD]

because I went in the 70s when I was a kid and always wished we could stay at the CR or Poly instead of schlepping to and from the Days Inn Kissimmee.

LOL that brought back memories:thumbsup2

As others have stated Location is Key

[greenban]

I have no idea why you would assume everyone wants a DVC at CR! I for one can guarantee you I will NEVER be staying there if they do! The CR holds nothing to intrigue me at all, and being near MK is not a plus for me either.

I have been very excited about AKV though! So glad DVC is doing AKV!!!

Hmmmmmm. Do I remember the Queen of OKW attempting to stay at the BWV?

And then backing down because of the uproar it generated (and blaming it on no availability, HA!)

Remember the words of Sean Penn, errrr Conery, "Never say Never Again!"

-Tony :love:

[Starr W.]

I have no idea why you would assume everyone wants a DVC at CR! I for one can guarantee you I will NEVER be staying there if they do! The CR holds nothing to intrigue me at all, and being near MK is not a plus for me either.

I have been very excited about AKV though! So glad DVC is doing AKV!!!


Now I feel the exact opposite of you, Diane. Could care less about AKV, but the CRV intrigues me to no end. Location, monorail, location, Cali Grill and Concourse steakhouse.

[dianeschlicht]

Hmmmmmm. Do I remember the Queen of OKW attempting to stay at the BWV?

And then backing down because of the uproar it generated (and blaming it on no availability, HA!)

Remember the words of Sean Penn, errrr Conery, "Never say Never Again!"

-Tony :love:

LOL, Tony! You do have part of that wrong! I tried to get BCV, not BWV. I could have had BWV, but passed and took my OKW again instead. :laughing:

[MommaX03]

1 - Ability to walk to the Magic Kingdom

2 - Monorail

The ability to get to two theme parks without a bus is a driving force behind the demand for the Epcot-based resorts (BCV and BWV). The same goes for this possible DVC resort.

[crisi]

I wouldn't buy there and might never stay there, but easy monorail access to the MK when you have stroller aged children is a really nice feature. (We are, thankfully, past that point).

Also, if they do the Contemporary type room decor - it doesn't appeal to everyone, but I like the decor. (The mosiac in the lobby however - oh so cutting edge in 1973!)

[greenban]

I wouldn't buy there and might never stay there, but easy monorail access to the MK when you have stroller aged children is a really nice feature. (We are, thankfully, past that point).

Also, if they do the Contemporary type room decor - it doesn't appeal to everyone, but I like the decor. (The mosiac in the lobby however - oh so cutting edge in 1973!)

Well there go my plans, if Crisi won't buy, neither will I!!!! ;)

-Tony

[bobbiwoz]

The Contemporary doesn't tempt me to buy. Thank heavens!!!:laughing: VWL will always be the MK resort of choice for me. It looks as if 100 AKV are in my future.

Bobbi:goodvibes

PS. However, I want to wait a few weeks, to see if this is what I/we really want. I wonder how the original OKW people did it...I know many didn't buy every single DVC that came down the pike!

[DisneyDVCdad]

That's easy! The Magic Kingdom! Every visit my family has made to Disney that is the first park we visit! And I would say that is where we spend the most time!

[spiceycat]

I wouldn't buy there and might never stay there, but easy monorail access to the MK when you have stroller aged children is a really nice feature. (We are, thankfully, past that point).



well how about you in a wheelchair or ECV or whatever they call them at the time....

for 50 years I would say it is a given.

I love the location.

[kdzgon]

The top 6 reasons for me:

1. Magic Kingdom/Fireworks/Lagoon view (incl Electric Parade!) (LOCATION)

2. Walkway to MK (LOCATION)

3.Chef Mickey's, Concourse Steakhouse and California Grill (LOCATION)

4. Marina/watercraft rentals (LOCATION)

5. Monorail to Epcot & to other monorail resorts (& Epcot) for meals (LOCATION)

6. Sandy beach (& hammocks) tiny as it is

And, maybe a little added nostalgia, 'cause ever since I first saw the Contemporary, I love that the monorail runs right through the building!

[kdzgon]

I wouldn't buy there and might never stay there, but easy monorail access to the MK when you have stroller aged children is a really nice feature. (We are, thankfully, past that point).

...

LOL - that's what I thought, too ("past that point")...and then last September we were there, schlepping 2 3YO grandsons around in a twin stroller (plus, after a few days, a scooter for DH as he injured his foot rather badly - operation is finally next Friday).

[CarolA]

Ok, please help me understand why there seems to be all this demand for DVC at the contemporary resort. I've never stayed there but it does look kinds plain there. No theming, no real landscaping and grounds to speak of. VWL is practicallly a stones throw away with much more resort feel and amenties I would think. Yea, Yea contemporary has a monorail station but is that REALLY why everyone wants it?

EVERYONE doesn't want it. I for one could care less and have NO desire to buy or stay at the CR.:rotfl:

The truth is I go to Disney lots of times and skip the MK and don't miss it. And I find the monorail to be amoung the most useless types of transport at Disney. "Holding for clearance" is a theme there! I also do not really enjoy being battered in the heels by the stroller brigade. (It's a STROLLER not a battering ram!)

A few other thoughts
1. Concourse Steakhouse is rumored to be closing and will reopen as an Asian themed resturant.
2. Sandy beaches and Hammocks are better at BCV (Location)
3. You can WALK to Epcot for meals at BCV (Location)
4 If I am in a wheelchair one day I want to wheel to the balcony to look at animals or wheel to Epcot to drink around the world. (Hey if I live to 80 or so I get to do what I want!)

[doubletrouble_vb]

Location, transportation and I'd like to say I'm in the minority but it looks like I'm on the lunatic fringe...I actually like the looks of the building, the decor and the theming (there's a great new tomorrow!).

Also...one up on BCV and BWV...you don't have to have a park ticket to use the monorail station.

[Sammie]

Location.

I think if they build, it is going to be a large structure. I think they are going to offer suites for the resorts and DVC in a combo building.

Also I think they will offer concierge and it will be located in the new building. I think it will be the first in what I would consider super luxury DVC. I think it will have some breathtaking views of the Magic Kingdom, and for me personally there is nothing at Disney I would rather see than the MK.

I think the concierge lounge will be at the top and have unbelieveable views of Wishes. I think you will see more upscale Dining offered there.

As to the decor, I really like the new look of the rooms, ultra chique.

[dvcjim]

Ok, please help me understand why there seems to be all this demand for DVC at the contemporary resort.

DVC resorts are in demand based upon how easy it is to get to the parks.

People buy into DVC with visions of going in and out of the parks with ease. No other resort can compare with the Contemp, with that in mind. BC/BW are close.

[DVCconvert]

EVERYONE doesn't want it. I for one could care less and have NO desire to buy or stay at the CR.:rotfl:

The truth is I go to Disney lots of times and skip the MK and don't miss it. And I find the monorail to be amoung the most useless types of transport at Disney. "Holding for clearance" is a theme there! I also do not really enjoy being battered in the heels by the stroller brigade. (It's a STROLLER not a battering ram!)

A few other thoughts
1. Concourse Steakhouse is rumored to be closing and will reopen as an Asian themed resturant.
2. Sandy beaches and Hammocks are better at BCV (Location)
3. You can WALK to Epcot for meals at BCV (Location)
4 If I am in a wheelchair one day I want to wheel to the balcony to look at animals or wheel to Epcot to drink around the world. (Hey if I live to 80 or so I get to do what I want!)


CarolA -- are you Diane's long lost sister??? :lmao:

1. - Some would welcome that change
2. - Not really
3. - As you could if you took the Monorail from CRV
4. - No contest - we'd all want you to do what you want to do (as the results from that not happening might disrupt the space-time continuum!!! ;) )

[DISNEY4FUN]

I like to be able to walk back and forth from MK. I actually liked the old theming in the rooms. I thought it was "cartoony". The new decor is less fun. Whose to say that a DVC villa would follow with the same decor. As everyone else has said, location means a great deal to me. I hate standing in line for a bus. Mk is my favorite park. At CR you can make a quick, spontaneous trip over to MK to shop, eat, etc. I'll buy in if they build.

[eyeheartgoofy]

You know, I never really was excited about the idea of a CR DVC until our last visit. I can't tell you how many times I thought it would be the bees knees to just hop on that monorail. We actually took the WL launch to the Contemporary to catch the monorail several times. In my opinion, the location would be especially nice for short stays where time is of the essence. Also, it would be nice when staying with young kids b/c of the easy access to MK and the quick getaway back to your hotel.

[byoung]

One word MONORAIL.

[lenshanem]

How many stories is the tower?

[Tigger031266]

Where to start:

1. Best Restaurants (Chef Mickey, Cal Grill)
2. Best Lake
3. Fast Boats
4. Best Arcades
5. Best View (MK from a tall building)
6. Monorail to MK
7. Monorail to Epcot
8. Monorail to Poly and GF and their restaurants and shops
9. Light parade at night on the water
10. Beach
11. Best Atrium (maybe WL is tied)
12. Memories
13. Boats to WL, MK and FW
14. The place overflows with WDW Magic
15. Walk to Magic Kingdom
16. Very sound proof rooms (take a look at they way it was constructed)
17. Large rooms with very pretty colors
18. Great Shops

We all know it needs some work but I envision a Contemporary with a Disney Quest inside, beautiful balconies, a futuristic waterpark type pool, life around bay lake, walkways to the WL and FW, Futuristic Restaurants....

[Anal Annie]

Now I feel the exact opposite of you, Diane. Could care less about AKV, but the CRV intrigues me to no end. Location, monorail, location, Cali Grill and Concourse steakhouse.


...but have you eaten at the Boma restaurant at AKL?! That's some good food over there... :banana:

[CarolA]

CarolA -- are you Diane's long lost sister??? :lmao:

1. - Some would welcome that change
2. - Not really
3. - As you could if you took the Monorail from CRV
4. - No contest - we'd all want you to do what you want to do (as the results from that not happening might disrupt the space-time continuum!!! ;) )


To get from CRV to Epcot requires TWO monorails and the numerous opportunities for "holding for clearance" Not my cup of tea.


(PLus why do parents think that since it's a monorail their child can RUN, SCREAM and climb over people They wouldn't allow this on a bus but on a monorail.... "they are just being kids" ! )

[Starr W.]

...but have you eaten at the Boma restaurant at AKL?! That's some good food over there... :banana:


Too far out there for the DH, we just got our waitlist for VWL and I have to change an ADR since it was at DTD and "that's too far to go" according to DH.
So if he won't go from VWL to DTD, he sure isn't going out to AKL for dinner.

[Barnum01]

This is the resort that will get me to buy DVC. Personally, it is a sentimental fav, because I went in the 70s when I was a kid and always wished we could stay at the CR or Poly instead of schlepping to and from the Days Inn Kissimmee.

Ditto! I was going to try to be witty, but all I can say is ditto (and that my schlepping lasted into the 80's).

Although, I'm still hoping they extend the WEDway (TTA) to the new building for a DVC exclusive entrance directly into Tomorrowland.

Regards

[DVCconvert]

To get from CRV to Epcot requires TWO monorails and the numerous opportunities for "holding for clearance" Not my cup of tea.


(PLus why do parents think that since it's a monorail their child can RUN, SCREAM and climb over people They wouldn't allow this on a bus but on a monorail.... "they are just being kids" ! )


Yes...that is VERY problematic.
It is a 'big' problem changing from one monorail to another. Perhaps a pre-sweetened tea would be more your cup? In my years of using the monorail I've NEVER had to 'HOLD for clearance' for more than 5-6 minutes.

However I must say that I've never personally witnessed out of control kids climbing over non related adults on a bus, but...that's just my experience! :)

[Anal Annie]

Too far out there for the DH, we just got our waitlist for VWL and I have to change an ADR since it was at DTD and "that's too far to go" according to DH.
So if he won't go from VWL to DTD, he sure isn't going out to AKL for dinner.


No arguement about the hike to get there...but we still have to go at least once during our stays tho...it's just not your usual fare...so it's worth it for us...we make a res. & I look at the trip over as being no diff. than going out to anyplace else on a Sat. nite & having to wait an hr. on some hard bench with a beeper/pager...except this is worth it! ::yes:: Forget the Savanah view - Boma is one of the best things about AKL... Anyway, sorry, I'm :offtopic: from the orig. thread here...

[Barnum01]

Location, transportation and I'd like to say I'm in the minority but it looks like I'm on the lunatic fringe...I actually like the looks of the building, the decor and the theming (there's a great new tomorrow!).

Agreed! My initial thoughts (way back when Tink found the images) were that the design was inspired by the original EPCOT née Progressland Progress City central hotel.

Completely wrong location and absolutely removed from its original intent and context, but if something like this is to be built, it might as well be as close to Tomorrowland as possible, since Epcot is certainly not EPCOT.

Regards again

[BroganMc]

How many stories is the tower?

16, according to that permit submitted last November along with the artist rendering.

As to the OP question:

I'd never pay cash to stay at the Contemporary, but I've always been fascinated with the idea of being able to sneak out and hike over to the Castle.

I also use a powerwheelchair, so the monorail makes a much easier and more reliable form of transport than the ferries (which are prone to decreased water levels).

My brother's family counts it as their favorite resort and routinely pay cash to stay there as wrap-around to a Disney cruise.

The size of the project suggests we'll be seeing more rooms (and more accessible rooms) than the tiny VWL/BCV resorts. For someone who needs to book a room with a roll-in shower or can't go, that becomes a major issue.

I like the EWP and view of MK fireworks. If I'm not mistaken, only BW-View rooms have a view of the EPCOT fireworks and then only if they are the high ones. But every view I've had of MK has shown me the castle with fireworks. I forget it is still a hike away.

Lastly, all this expansion means DVC is booming. Since I just got in last May, it means a return on my investment in the form of newer, exciting possibilities for vacationing. (And judging by the AKV points chart, it won't break the bank either.)

[Mtnman44]

Ok. Now all of you have me excited about CRV DVC too! I'm not yet sure I'd need to own there, but it might be fun to use points at. Same with VAK, I'm just not sure I need to own there but looking forward to visiting. I will be adding on at BWV however because that is a great location too!

[CinderellaPug]

Over the past year, DW has asked me several times why I am so interested in this project. I often ask her these two questions

Q: What is the best park in DisneyWorld?
A: MK

Q: What is the best(most interesting) form of transportation?
A: Monorail

Therefore - why not buy in and hang out in the place that is the closest to the best park with the coolest transportation?

She also loves California Grill which might help me convince her down the road to buy in.

[kdzgon]

EVERYONE doesn't want it. I for one could care less and have NO desire to buy or stay at the CR.:rotfl:

The truth is I go to Disney lots of times and skip the MK and don't miss it. And I find the monorail to be amoung the most useless types of transport at Disney. "Holding for clearance" is a theme there! I also do not really enjoy being battered in the heels by the stroller brigade. (It's a STROLLER not a battering ram!)

A few other thoughts
1. Concourse Steakhouse is rumored to be closing and will reopen as an Asian themed resturant.
2. Sandy beaches and Hammocks are better at BCV (Location)
3. You can WALK to Epcot for meals at BCV (Location)
4 If I am in a wheelchair one day I want to wheel to the balcony to look at animals or wheel to Epcot to drink around the world. (Hey if I live to 80 or so I get to do what I want!)

CarolA,

If it weren't for the fact that we have 4 grandchildren under four and another on the way, I agree MK would probably not be all that important. However, as a large motivation (for us) for purchasing DVC was trips with the grands, I anticipate many trips to the MK in our foreseeable future. Scooter/wheelchair access goes along with MK (we never take the monorail there), and DH loves fireworks but one DGS (he lives with us full-time right now) is terrified of the noise right now. The view from the Contemporary is a good compromise (for now) and also allows us to get the grands in to bed a bit earlier those nights.

The monorail is OK when considered an experience rather than merely transportation, and is much easier to use when dealing with both a scooter and stroller (I DO try and watch out for heels whenever possible, tho :goodvibes ). The beach and hammocks were just a little kicker and not a prime motivator.

I haven't been to BCV yet, but definitely plan to on a trip without the little ones. Without so many little grands, I'd say the Epcot resorts would be as good or better locations than CRV for us, as well.

Laurie

these icons added on the insistence of my 3 YO DGS :stir: :artist: :moped:

[lenshanem]

I also do not really enjoy being battered in the heels by the stroller brigade. (It's a STROLLER not a battering ram!)

(PLus why do parents think that since it's a monorail their child can RUN, SCREAM and climb over people They wouldn't allow this on a bus but on a monorail.... "they are just being kids" ! )

Carol, Carol... You're right! I don't think you need to be near the MK. :rotfl:



BroganMC, thanks for the info. I actually meant the main tower, not the DVC Contemporary building. I was just curious how the two buildings would line up against each other in height. Anyone know the main tower's stories? Thanks! :goodvibes


And I love this thread. I hadn't even thought about the ease of getting to the other monorail resorts for restaurants, shopping and even pool hopping! :hyper:

[spiceycat]

I think California grill is on the 14 or 15 floor.

So I don't think it is 16 - but it has stuff on the roof - and I think the DVC or Cont suites will be the same height when finished.

dvc won't be taller.

members who say that the building will look awfully - well I have yet to see a DVC building that looks even bad.

It won't compete with Cont - but will make it look even better (my opinion) - the way VWL & WL, BC & BCV - finished off the hotel.

[spiceycat]

To get from CRV to Epcot requires TWO monorails and the numerous opportunities for "holding for clearance" Not my cup of tea.

we have had this happen a couple of times - but mother not to mention everyone else in my family - looks at the monrail as a ride at WDW. not just transportation.

hey at least we weren't on it - when it stopped and the guests on it had to be taken down..... talk about panic attacks.:firefight


(PLus why do parents think that since it's a monorail their child can RUN, SCREAM and climb over people They wouldn't allow this on a bus but on a monorail.... "they are just being kids" ! )

so sorry this happened to you.:worried:

It hasn't happened to me (yet) - but I think kids are little scared of me. I find kids are very interesting to study and their parents even more.:joker:

[dwelty]

I agree with other posts here. There is no theaming! Just a big concrete highrise no different than what you would see in any big city. Frankly it scares me a little that DVC is going to go this direction. I hope VAKL is a sign that they still plan on theaming their resorts in the future.

[kdzgon]

I agree with other posts here. There is no theaming! Just a big concrete highrise no different than what you would see in any big city. Frankly it scares me a little that DVC is going to go this direction. I hope VAKL is a sign that they still plan on theaming their resorts in the future.

I suspect there may be a big difference as a DVC owner vs a non-owner, but IMO heavy theming is not as important when the resort rooms are mostly a place to sleep. And remember, when it was first built, it was quite "futuristic", so I would argue it was indeed themed when built, perhaps just not a theme to the liking of some. (For those in North Jersey, think the painting outside of the old Alexander's building...)

[BroganMc]

I suspect there may be a big difference as a DVC owner vs a non-owner, but IMO heavy theming is not as important when the resort rooms are mostly a place to sleep. And remember, when it was first built, it was quite "futuristic", so I would argue it was indeed themed when built, perhaps just not a theme to the liking of some.

Agreed. If you compare the look of the Contemporary (and the proposed Villa) to nearby Space Mountain, it's all pretty much the same style. A Jetsons/60's style view of 21st-22nd century style. Something borne out of the 1920's art noveau style.

Ironically, when I first traveled the World in '98 (staying at All Star Sports), I found the Contemporary was the least handicap accessible and therefore least futuristic of the MK resorts. To get to Chef Mickey's for breakfast I had to start out 2 hours early and take 2 busses. There wasn't an elevator from the monorail to the concourse at the time. Just an escalator.

[spiceycat]

lly, when I first traveled the World in '98 (staying at All Star Sports), I found the Contemporary was the least handicap accessible and therefore least futuristic of the MK resorts. To get to Chef Mickey's for breakfast I had to start out 2 hours early and take 2 busses. There wasn't an elevator from the monorail to the concourse at the time. Just an escalator.

remember that. It was a big deal when they put that elevator in and it only does to the 4th floor just like the escalator.

then you transfer to the other elevator to go to your room or leave the resort.

I think someone made them???? don't remember the details. the CR use to say in all its advertisement that it was not handicapped accessible - but they did provide a bus/van.

I think some of the wing rooms were handicapped?????

[keishashadow]

I say a little prayer every day;) . In our eyes the CR is "it".

We initially bought sold out VWL (sight unseen) for the proximity to MK, our fav. park.

Although DH feel head over heels and became a DVC believer because of WL, I can easily see us selling that portion of our contract for CRV:banana: .

Beauty of DVC, something for everyone.

[CR Resort Fan 4 Life]

Well for me cr is not very appealing..i like the restaurants though and the monorail of course but I probably wouldn't buy there. I would probably try and use my points to stay there or if I were to buy it would be the smallest point contract available. Really, I'd rather buy at poly dvc or grand floridian dvc..but that may never happen. Why is it that the people who say they don't like the Contemporary for their lack of themeing, also say they will go there for the restaurants? I guess that comment comes from the fact that a lot of times when my family & I return there during the evening, it can take a while to find a parking spot because of the guests who are just their for an ADR. I am not saying non Contemporary are not welcome to eat there, it's just that parking there can sometimes be a pain & I wish the Contemporary would have a seperate parking lot for guests staying there & for guests with ADR's, like they have at the Board Walk & other Resorts around WDW.

[spiceycat]

Why is it that the people who say they don't like the Contemporary for their lack of themeing, also say they will go there for the restaurants? I guess that comment comes from the fact that a lot of times when my family & I return there during the evening, it can take a while to find a parking spot because of the guests who are just their for an ADR. I am not saying non Contemporary are not welcome to eat there, it's just that parking there can sometimes be a pain & I wish the Contemporary would have a seperate parking lot for guests staying there & for guests with ADR's, like they have at the Board Walk & other Resorts around WDW.

It wasn't easy getting WDW to agree to the one at BW. I think it helped that several conventions also complainted. besides if a non-BW says they are eating there - well guess what the BWV or BWI does not have a restuarant - all the restuarants are along the BW - not the hotel.

the CR is not designed that way.

[CR Resort Fan 4 Life]

It wasn't easy getting WDW to agree to the one at BW. I think it helped that several conventions also complainted. besides if a non-BW says they are eating there - well guess what the BWV or BWI does not have a restuarant - all the restuarants are along the BW - not the hotel.

the CR is not designed that way. That maybe true but the main point is the Board Walk still has a seperate parking lot for it's guests who happen to be staying there & for guests just comming to eat there. While I doubt the Contemporary will have a seperate parking lot, it's something I wish that one day they can consider because of all the conventions they have there, the amount of regular guests staying there & all the guests there every morning & evening to eat at Chef Mickey's, Concourse Steakhouse & the California Grill.

[jade1]

Obviously not everyone wants CRV, but I could swear I read somewhere that MK had a fairly high attendance each year and that even some people equated the MK as Walt Disney World itself. Anyway if there is any interest in the MK, maybe some people would be interested in staying within walking distance and or being able to see into the MK/Wishes from their room or quiet pool on the roof.;)

Its like looking from a train at the scenery-do you really care what the train looks like?

[JWG]

To the original thread topic:

I'd like CRV for location and convenience. Its on the monorail, so easy access to Epcot. Its right at MK. Those are the two parks I frequent the most (Epcot being 1, MK being 2). Chef Mickey's is a favorite of mine. We have a 5 mos. old DD - MK looks to become more important. View of the fire works show and castle from our room? How cool that would be.

Current sales locations are not convenient. SSR is a nice "campus" feel, but only close to DTD. Nice for many, but I want easy access to theme parks. AKV is great views of the safari, but only really convenient to AK.

I could do a resale of BWV or BCV, but my parents bought into BWV in 1998 or 1999 and we have the opportunity to purchase trips from them. Odds are we will buy or get their ownership someday as well - so why buy there now?

Lastly, its financial. Even if I loved the current DVC purchase options, I couldn't afford to buy in and pay the dues. By the time CRV sales start, I hope that's changed.

[minnie61650]

1 - Ability to walk to the Magic Kingdom

2 - Monorail


I agree.
It all about location,location,location.
I am not yet a DVC member. I am waiting for DVC with acess to monorail.
I have been waiting for 15 ears for a DVC monorail location.
I guess I can wait a few more.

Here is to hoping!:wizard:

[kdzgon]

Can someone compare the interest in a potential CRV to that of BCV when it was first anticipated? I wasn't around back then, but it seems to me people are pretty passionate about BCV (mostly for, but a few against), and in fact I sense an even more similar passion for WLV (people either seem to love it or strongly dislke/have absolutely no interest in). Both BCV and WLV, while not monorail resorts, have good locations for a specific theme park. Was there a very high interest for either or both these resorts when they were announced?

[BroganMc]

I think someone made them???? don't remember the details. the CR use to say in all its advertisement that it was not handicapped accessible - but they did provide a bus/van.

Hence the oxymoron of it being the "futuristic hotel of the 21st century". But back in the early '70s the last thing on anyone's mind was accommodating the disabled. I remember knock down drag out fights with my parents and doctors over this. A very demoralizing time to grow up with a disabling disease. Fortunately enough wise people spoke up and pointed out how stupid it was that the world eventually changed.

I remember at the time it completely ruined my first impression of Chef Mickey's. I've learned to love it since. But then now I park at the TTC and ride the monorail over. I still manage to get to Cape may more often for a character breakfast though.

I imagine any new DVC building will be 10x better at making this resort a truly 21st century hotel.

I think some of the wing rooms were handicapped?????

I don't know about then, but I know several of the Tower rooms are now. My aunt stayed in one March '05. Nice room but way too small for my timeshare sensibilities to fork over all that cash.

[d-r]

The monorail is a big deal. And theme park and bay lake views. But a lot of people who are of the age to buy dvc points are probably in their 30s and have a family. If they were like me, when they were kids the contemporary seemed pretty cool. Actually, the monorail going through it seems pretty cool to me now. There is a lot of nostalgia there. My wife talks about memories of the food and fun center and top of the world for example. There is a lot of nostalgia for folks in the contemporary just like the polly and fort wilderness. And just like those other two originals, the contemporary is an extention of the magic kingdom. It is the tommorowland resort just as much as the polly is the adventureland resort and ft. wilderness is the frontierland resort. So it has that extension of the park feeling. Like when you see "perfect park acres" from the people mover. Sure california grill is good and chef mickey's has pbj pizza, but I think nostalgia and gee whiz is as much of it as anything. And it isn't true at all to say the contemporary is "themeless" - it is the tomorrowland resort, and its theme IS disneyworld. It has always been there. It just belongs there. Plus the Mary Blair murals make it one of the MOST disney of the resorts for that matter. I think you just have to get it. But when we decided to get AKV points, my wife made it clear that she WOULD be getting contemporary points if they become available.

Oh, yeah, they have Seadoos at the contemporary.

[jemiaule]

Ok, please help me understand why there seems to be all this demand for DVC at the contemporary resort. I've never stayed there but it does look kinds plain there. No theming, no real landscaping and grounds to speak of. VWL is practicallly a stones throw away with much more resort feel and amenties I would think. Yea, Yea contemporary has a monorail station but is that REALLY why everyone wants it?

1) I love the new refurbed rooms at CR. If you like that kind of sleek dark wood design it is really nice. I would love to see full DVC Villas decorated like this.

2) When we used to stay at CR (pre DVC days) we enjoyed walking to MK; especially at the end of the day rather than cramming onto the monorail. But that said...

3) My kiddos LOVE the monorail.

4) Walking distance to Chef Mickeys!

5) Easier to get to the restaurants at Poly and GF. We do not drive to WDW and only on occassion rent a car when visiting.

6) Possibility of an MK view!

We are not big Wilderness Lodge fans. In fact when we talked about where to buy points VWL was not even a contender.

[graygables]

Personally, I'll take the bus fumes over the monorail "funk" any day! :lmao: I've never seen a "used" diaper on the bus, but in the last 3 years, have seen at least 5 stuffed (or just out in the open) around the monorail cars. I suppose there is more time during the "holding pattern" to change the little bugger on the ledge behind the seats (that IS what it's FOR, right??? :sad2: ) where's the heebie-jeebie smiley???

Honestly, we stayed at the GF at the beginning of our "Kellogg's Trip" and the AKL at the end and EVERYONE preferred the AKL. Transportation was excellent, not having to change monorails (and those ramps are a BEAR to hold a wheelchair on when you're stuck in line.). The CR just holds no appeal for our family whatsoever and the monorail is certainly not a selling point (and I have a DD who uses a wheelchair). Of all the resorts, it is the ONLY one that no one has ever asked to stay in. We will be there in September, but only b/c I'm doing a convention there and maybe it will change our minds, but we are desperately hoping to use our new AKV points *after* the convention!

[tvwalsh]

Remember when the AFL finally played in the super bowl against the NFL team? Remember when the leagues were merged into one league? Then finally when the teams were intermixed in the various divisions?

I think this is a good analogy for the DVC and WDW. For a while we were apart from the mainline Disney Hotels (When OKW, the Vacation Club Resort, was the only option for members.) The decision to allow us to use our points at any of the existing resorts in WDW was another move into full partnership. Then, with the building of BWV, VWL, and BCV we (DVC) became part of the new hotels of WDW. The only step left is the building of a DVC building at one of the original monorail resorts. I think all of us, whether we like the new resort and buy into it or not, will benefit from this "full partnership" or as the NFL and AFL used to say, parity.

P.S. I do know that the DVC has always been part of Disney.

[Knotty]

Why the hype for CR dvc?

location, location,location.

The only advantage DVC has over other Orlando area time shares is the locations they have.

Other time shares are cheaper, and have life time ownership.

If you are unable to walk to a park, or take a monorail/boat to park, why even own dvc vs other timeshares.

There are many 1800+ sq feet homes you can rent in for a week in the Orlando area for what we pay for our annual dues/taxes. Unless you are on the doorstep of a park, you would be much better off to rent one of these.

[shovan]

Hence the oxymoron of it being the "futuristic hotel of the 21st century". But back in the early '70s the last thing on anyone's mind was accommodating the disabled. I remember knock down drag out fights with my parents and doctors over this. A very demoralizing time to grow up with a disabling disease. Fortunately enough wise people spoke up and pointed out how stupid it was that the world eventually changed.
I remember at the time it completely ruined my first impression of Chef Mickey's. I've learned to love it since. But then now I park at the TTC and ride the monorail over. I still manage to get to Cape may more often for a character breakfast though.
I imagine any new DVC building will be 10x better at making this resort a truly 21st century hotel.

BroganMc, we have actually never visited CR because of the early lack of access. We are former Poly addicts & clearly remember riding thru CR on the monorail but not being able to get off to see the place! We didn't hear that it was accessible until years after it happened.

While I'm sure anything new will be much better than CR was. We're not counting on total accessibilty at any WDW resort. We're still shocked that the pool at BC is not accessible.

Of course the interest in CR is as said, location, location, location. Now, if they ever consider DVC at the Poly, we'll be on the phone asap!

[spiceycat]

I wasn't around back then, but it seems to me people are pretty passionate about BCV (mostly for, but a few against), and in fact I sense an even more similar passion for WLV (people either seem to love it or strongly dislke/have absolutely no interest in). Both BCV and WLV, while not monorail resorts, have good locations for a specific theme park. Was there a very high interest for either or both these resorts when they were announced?

VWL definitely.

would you believe me and several others did not believe BCV would be a DVC resort until it was announced....:thumbsup2

BCV gets is popularity from BC. It got alot of WDW resorts to be members. who wouldn't have considered it before.

[corpcomp]

Why the hype for CR dvc?

location, location,location.

The only advantage DVC has over other Orlando area time shares is the locations they have.

Other time shares are cheaper, and have life time ownership.

If you are unable to walk to a park, or take a monorail/boat to park, why even own dvc vs other timeshares.

There are many 1800+ sq feet homes you can rent in for a week in the Orlando area for what we pay for our annual dues/taxes. Unless you are on the doorstep of a park, you would be much better off to rent one of these.


You forget that all other timeshares drop in value the day after, no make that the hour after you buy them. There are tons of timeshares in Orlando selling for half the value that the new units are selling for.

Disney supports the pricing so at least if you want to sell in 5 years you can/ likely get back most of your money at this point (but not in another 20 years for the current group (except SSR)).

I was going to buy an add-on at BCV but will wait for a while till I hear more about this demolition. I'd buy an add-on at CRV if it came true. The only thing I don't like about CRV is the size of the building versus the amount of land or lack of it around it and the fact that, if the cresent shape is the real ending shape, the inside windows are all facing each other. And the pool area seems small versus the number of units.

I bet the final building is something smaller and with less of a curve so that the water views are better.

[DVCPAT]

I agree with other posts here. There is no theaming! Just a big concrete highrise no different than what you would see in any big city. Frankly it scares me a little that DVC is going to go this direction. I hope VAKL is a sign that they still plan on theaming their resorts in the future.

I really don’t think Disney is going to duplicate the 70s theme. I think the new resort will totally upstage the old CR with an awesome pool, 4th floor monorail catwalk, roof top observation deck and great waterfront views. It’s prime location and monorail access will provide a great foundation for a new DVC resort.

[simzac]

Why the hype for CR dvc?

location, location,location.

The only advantage DVC has over other Orlando area time shares is the locations they have.

Other time shares are cheaper, and have life time ownership.

If you are unable to walk to a park, or take a monorail/boat to park, why even own dvc vs other timeshares.

There are many 1800+ sq feet homes you can rent in for a week in the Orlando area for what we pay for our annual dues/taxes. Unless you are on the doorstep of a park, you would be much better off to rent one of these.

As far as life time membership, I will be 83 when my OKW membership expires. Thats enough lifetime for me. And as far as being on the "doorstep" of the parks, only BWV in my opinion can say they are on the doorstep of 2 parks, BCV is too far from Studios to be considered on the doorstep. So even these resorts require some form of transportation to get to the other parks. My point is, being on Disney property in a DVC resort no matter where it is beats staying off site anyday. CRV will be liked by many members, but it will only be close to one park, the other 3 will be quite far away. I for one like the buses, so any DVC resort will work for me. This is of course, JMO.

[MinnieGi]

[QUOTE=dkostel;16693330]This is the resort that will get me to buy DVC. Personally, it is a sentimental fav, because I went in the 70s when I was a kid and always wished we could stay at the CR or Poly instead of schlepping to and from the Days Inn Kissimmee.

You too??? I was that kid also!!!

[OneMoreTry]

This is the resort that will get me to buy DVC. Personally, it is a sentimental fav, because I went in the 70s when I was a kid and always wished we could stay at the CR or Poly instead of schlepping to and from the Days Inn Kissimmee. ....

This is my reason, too. "Neil schlept here." That's me in Kissimmee.

There's one other sentimental reason. It was Walt's baby. Walt wanted the CR. His consultants/engineers advised against it, but he pressed on -- then died. So it reminds me of Walt.

[BroganMc]

BroganMc, we have actually never visited CR because of the early lack of access. We are former Poly addicts & clearly remember riding thru CR on the monorail but not being able to get off to see the place! We didn't hear that it was accessible until years after it happened.

Accessibility issues are like bad restaurant food. Once you encounter it at a location, that location is forever branded in your memory.

We're still shocked that the pool at BC is not accessible.

Ah, now you know why I'm not a fan of that particular resort. All the SAB fervor meets a brick wall in my ears. All I can think of is "no zero entry?", seriously what's the point? :confused3

But I think CRV will correct most of those misconceptions. Fact is Disney has gotten much better in planning for accessibility issues. SSR is great. AKV will probably be just as good or better.

[jade1]

[QUOTE=BroganMc;16986435]All I can think of is "no zero entry?", seriously what's the point? :confused3
QUOTE]

SAB has over 100 feet of zero entry.:thumbsup2

[alldiz]

I never wanted to stay at the contemporary....

IMO too sterile...

anyway DD always asks to stay there....

If there was a DVC...I would try it...
Just for monorail....and restaurants...

They need a kids club however...

I am happy with new DVC's anywhere...more choices..
Kerri

[spiceycat]

This is my reason, too. "Neil schlept here." That's me in Kissimmee.

There's one other sentimental reason. It was Walt's baby. Walt wanted the CR. His consultants/engineers advised against it, but he pressed on -- then died. So it reminds me of Walt.

remember walt disney DIED long before WDW was even started.

Roy Disney on the other hand, made WDW possible. He came out of retirement to do Walt's Dream.

that dream - at least what you see at tomorrowland TTC ride - does NOT include the CR.

[spiceycat]

en a "used" diaper on the bus, but in the last 3 years, have seen at least 5 stuffed (or just out in the open) around the monorail cars. I suppose there is more time during the "holding pattern" to change the little bugger on the ledge behind the seats (that IS what it's FOR, right??? :sad2: ) where's the heebie-jeebie smiley???

Transportation was excellent, not having to change monorails (and those ramps are a BEAR to hold a wheelchair on when you're stuck in line.). The CR just holds no appeal for our family whatsoever and the monorail is certainly not a selling point (and I have a DD who uses a wheelchair). Of all the resorts, it is the ONLY one that no one has ever asked to stay in. We will be there in September, but only b/c I'm doing a convention there and maybe it will change our minds

that is one reason why the CR is a little better than the GF transportation wise.

at night when you are leaving if there are a ton of people - you can easily walk to the CR - no need to get on the monrail. unless you want too.

mother has a wheelchair and she loves CR.

of course - I am really worst - I stay at BW for Epcot and Studio, and VWL for the MK (this would include CR if and when).

AK doesn't really matter until now....would love to stay at AKV.

but there have been vacations when we ONLY went to the MK. depends upon the ages you are with - this is mother and my niece favorite park and would happily spend forever here. I preferred Epcot.

yes I know what you mean about the wheelchair - I guess we were luck wasn't stuck on the ramp - if I am I just put on the brakes.

people actually changing their children diapers on the monrail.... boy that is awfully. :scared1:

says more about the guest than Disney. Most people don't expect other people to be so rude and uncaring about others passengers to even consider doing this on the monrail. I think if I saw it - I would mention to these guest 'did they know about restrooms'.....

and unless you mentioned it to a CM at the monrail they have no way of knowing. they do a quick check - not nothing in depth until the end of the day.

Diapers on the monrail - how sick!!!!

t

[lenshanem]

On a similar topic of diapers on the monorial...

This past trip my youngest saw a woman rinsing out her baby's butt in the sink in the women's room that had had a blow out.

It was terribly disturbing to my daughter cause for the rest of the trip she didn't want to wash her hands in the sink cause babies' butts had been in there. :lmao:

[Scotch]

On a similar topic of diapers on the monorial...

This past trip my youngest saw a woman rinsing out her baby's butt in the sink in the women's room that had had a blow out.

It was terribly disturbing to my daughter cause for the rest of the trip she didn't want to wash her hands in the sink cause babies' butts had been in there. :lmao:

OMG! Yuck!! And here I am reading this while munching on food. Blah.

[graygables]

On a similar topic of diapers on the monorial...

This past trip my youngest saw a woman rinsing out her baby's butt in the sink in the women's room that had had a blow out.

It was terribly disturbing to my daughter cause for the rest of the trip she didn't want to wash her hands in the sink cause babies' butts had been in there. :lmao:

I had an acquaintance who refused to let her DD use the "filthy toilets" in ANY public restroom and would hold her over the sink to let her go wee-wee there. This lasted until the girl was too big to be held comfortably. This is why I carry anti-bac gel and wipes and skip the restroom sinks...

[jemiaule]

On a similar topic of diapers on the monorial...

This past trip my youngest saw a woman rinsing out her baby's butt in the sink in the women's room that had had a blow out.

It was terribly disturbing to my daughter cause for the rest of the trip she didn't want to wash her hands in the sink cause babies' butts had been in there. :lmao:


Sounds like the woman we saw at the drinking fountain who was rinsing & splashing her chest and armpits.

Yes, I will pay $4 for bottled water after seeing that.

[spiceycat]

Sounds like the woman we saw at the drinking fountain who was rinsing & splashing her chest and armpits.

Yes, I will pay $4 for bottled water after seeing that.

oh dear -I am going next month - okay add bottled water to the list. I already do anti-bac gel - but some scientist are saying they don't work. (well I think they certainly did for me).

so it is back to the wipes with soap.

oh this is awfully - don't people have sense anymore.

[the who #3]

just my opinion. i have 3 resort memberships, each for a different reason.

saratogo, in case you have all adults going dtd can be lots of fun (for kids too)

bwv, for beautiful walks to epcot and mgm which we all love, not to mention the restaurants at both of those parks.

akv, for the extreme beauty of nature, quite and the animals and boma,

crv would complete my collection as it would provide the great restaurants to be found in that area, view of mk and maybe even the castle, the monorail or boat service to mk. i found when staying at the poly that the boat or monorail to mk made it possible to run back at the end of the day for one more ride or for the kids to find that special t-shirt or pin before leaving for home. that is actually much faster than the walk to epcot or mgm.:goodvibes

has anyone heard anymore about a real venture in that direction?:confused3

[LodgeMan]

Location, Location, Location

[AKVCRVDVC]

Location, Location, Location
Exactly. Not to mention the monorail, thats a huge plus! I've always been fascinated with the Contemporary every since I was a child. Now there is an excuse for me to stay there many times in a row! :goodvibes:

[kdzgon]

just my opinion. i have 3 resort memberships, each for a different reason.

saratogo, in case you have all adults going dtd can be lots of fun (for kids too)

bwv, for beautiful walks to epcot and mgm which we all love, not to mention the restaurants at both of those parks.

akv, for the extreme beauty of nature, quite and the animals and boma,

crv would complete my collection as it would provide the great restaurants to be found in that area, view of mk and maybe even the castle, the monorail or boat service to mk. i found when staying at the poly that the boat or monorail to mk made it possible to run back at the end of the day for one more ride or for the kids to find that special t-shirt or pin before leaving for home. that is actually much faster than the walk to epcot or mgm.:goodvibes



has anyone heard anymore about a real venture in that direction?:confused3

FYI, there is no longer boat service from the CR to MK, even though the maps still show it. Still a good location tho - it's a pretty easy walk and you can always take the monorail otherwise.

[kdzgon]

On a similar topic of diapers on the monorial...

This past trip my youngest saw a woman rinsing out her baby's butt in the sink in the women's room that had had a blow out.

It was terribly disturbing to my daughter cause for the rest of the trip she didn't want to wash her hands in the sink cause babies' butts had been in there. :lmao:

Does she not bathe in any tubs except your own, either? The sinks are made of impervious material - as long as the sink was washed out (and/or you are washing your hands) with soap and hot water I don't get the problem. IMO, it is actually more sanitary than trying to clean the baby's bottom with baby wipes while on the changing tables that are textured plastic. Plus, even if the mother/caretaker didn't do the right thing, the rest rooms are cleaned on a regular cycle by Disney employees.

Now, public water fountains - talk about a bacterial breeding ground, even without the armpit splashing - unless they too are being wiped down on a regular basis.

The problem with the antibacterial soaps and lotions is that our bodies build up resistance to them eventually reducing their effectiveness and contributing to the development of "super germs".

[lenshanem]

Does she not bathe in any tubs except your own, either? The sinks are made of impervious material - as long as the sink was washed out (and/or you are washing your hands) with soap and hot water I don't get the problem. IMO, it is actually more sanitary than trying to clean the baby's bottom with baby wipes while on the changing tables that are textured plastic. Plus, even if the mother/caretaker didn't do the right thing, the rest rooms are cleaned on a regular cycle by Disney employees.

Now, public water fountains - talk about a bacterial breeding ground, even without the armpit splashing - unless they too are being wiped down on a regular basis.

The problem with the antibacterial soaps and lotions is that our bodies build up resistance to them eventually reducing their effectiveness and contributing to the development of "super germs".


You have got to be kidding me! She is a little girl and saw a woman rinsing out a baby's butt in the sink. She thought it was gross, I posted this cause it was funny. I didn't post it to get a lecture. A mom has gotta do what she has gotta do. Babies have blow outs.

[spiceycat]

, the rest rooms are cleaned on a regular cycle by Disney employees.



Disney is now hiring out this function. so the rest rooms are not nearly as clean as they use to be.

this was a big mistake on Disney part and I hope before someone is hurt they realize it.

the rest room at Epcot was dirty, over crowded, water everywhere and the person who should have been cleaning it was standing outside - waiting - not sure for what?

[kdzgon]

You have got to be kidding me! She is a little girl and saw a woman rinsing out a baby's butt in the sink. She thought it was gross, I posted this cause it was funny. I didn't post it to get a lecture. A mom has gotta do what she has gotta do. Babies have blow outs.

I'm so sorry! Didn't mean to lecture re: your daughter and I probably should not have quoted your post as I was really responding to some of the reactions (to your post).

[lenshanem]

I'm so sorry! Didn't mean to lecture re: your daughter and I probably should not have quoted your post as I was really responding to some of the reactions (to your post).


All is cool. :goodvibes

[mb168]

Monorail schmonorail. It'll be a further walk from CRV UPSTAIRS to the station and then back down from the station (GF side) to the entrance to MK (on the CR side) than the hop, skip, and jump right to the front gate from the villas!!! I've only recently stayed in that north wing that'll go away last Fall but it was so sweet being able to walk right to the gate pushing DD3 in her stroller instead of to the lobby, wait on the elevator, get it on the monorail, rush off the monorail down the ramp....

As for theming, it is, well, Contemporary. When it was built it was styled to be a futuristic looking place with clean lines, brushed metal, angles, etc. But since we're all living in the future compared to the 70s, it's just plain to us, especially since every kid on the block has a flying car and jet pack :)

[Barnum01]

Monorail schmonorail. It'll be a further walk from CRV UPSTAIRS to the station and then back down from the station (GF side) to the entrance to MK (on the CR side) than the hop, skip, and jump right to the front gate from the villas!!!

Yes, but what about the WEDway (TTA) extension into the new building featuring the CRV-only exclusive entrance into Tomorrowland? How much more fun would that be? :woohoo:

Regards

[mb168]

Ahhhh, that would be awesome. Like the International Gateway at EPCOT. Be an unfair sneak right to Space Mountain at rope drop.:)

[Barnum01]

Ahhhh, that would be awesome. Like the International Gateway at EPCOT. Be an unfair sneak right to Space Mountain at rope drop.:)
I'll ride Omega, you ride Alpha...ready, set, go!

[starbox]

The current CR does not appeal to me, but if DVC did something attractive there with interesting CS and TS dining options (sorry, but Chef Mickey's is like one of the levels of Dante's Inferno to me), and a nice pool area, I'd be tempted by the location.

I am not a monorail fan, I've been trapped in too many stinky monorail cars. I do however, like the option of walking to the MK.

[jemiaule]

Monorail schmonorail. It'll be a further walk from CRV UPSTAIRS to the station and then back down from the station (GF side) to the entrance to MK (on the CR side) than the hop, skip, and jump right to the front gate from the villas!!! I've only recently stayed in that north wing that'll go away last Fall but it was so sweet being able to walk right to the gate pushing DD3 in her stroller instead of to the lobby, wait on the elevator, get it on the monorail, rush off the monorail down the ramp....



Don't forget or under-estimate that you can also take the monorail to TTS then to Epcot. That is also where the appeal is to my boys who are monorail fanatics. I would prefer to walk to MK from CR also.

[mb168]

That one I'd have to think about. Currently if we are intending on spending most time at EPCOT, we stay at BCV and use the International Gateway, any other time we just drive there. A monorail ride though to EPCOT virtually makes it "next door" and MK is next door.

Ok, where do I sign, forget AKV.

[Figment56]

Okay, I would stay for location, but would probably not buy. IMHO-I think Disney should put people movers-no-not the buses-the one the goes around space mountain and such to ALL the resorts! Right to the front door! As I get older, I start out okay in the mornings to the parks, but on the way back, I can barely step onto the bus, never mind walk back to my room at the resort! LOL-:rotfl2: Maybe they will come up with transporters you can step into and go right to your room-yes-as in Star Trek! Now that would be cool!:cloud9:

[JWG]

Okay, I would stay for location, but would probably not buy. IMHO-I think Disney should put people movers-no-not the buses-the one the goes around space mountain and such to ALL the resorts! Right to the front door! As I get older, I start out okay in the mornings to the parks, but on the way back, I can barely step onto the bus, never mind walk back to my room at the resort! LOL-:rotfl2: Maybe they will come up with transporters you can step into and go right to your room-yes-as in Star Trek! Now that would be cool!:cloud9:


Sounds like you should go in on a Segway! I'd love to have one of those to tool around the parks.... from door to door without taking a step.

[erikthewise]

Why does everyone want CRV DVC?

Because they can't have Polynesian Villas.
At least not yet. I'm holding out for it! It will happen in my lifetime.
Though maybe just barely...:rotfl2:

[TDC Nala]

Ok, please help me understand why there seems to be all this demand for DVC at the contemporary resort. I've never stayed there but it does look kinds plain there. No theming, no real landscaping and grounds to speak of. VWL is practicallly a stones throw away with much more resort feel and amenties I would think. Yea, Yea contemporary has a monorail station but is that REALLY why everyone wants it?

Yeah, it is.

I'm not all that interested in the monorail myself, but to some, there ARE no resorts besides the MK resorts.

[shovan]

Accessibility issues are like bad restaurant food. Once you encounter it at a location, that location is forever branded in your memory.
Ah, now you know why I'm not a fan of that particular resort. All the SAB fervor meets a brick wall in my ears. All I can think of is "no zero entry?", seriously what's the point? :confused3 But I think CRV will correct most of those misconceptions. Fact is Disney has gotten much better in planning for accessibility issues. SSR is great. AKV will probably be just as good or better.
[QUOTE=BroganMc;16986435]All I can think of is "no zero entry?", seriously what's the point? :confused3
QUOTE]

SAB has over 100 feet of zero entry.:thumbsup2
jade1, What???:confused3

BroganMc, We were just informed my a manager at BC that they now have a beach wheelchair for the zero entry pool! Oh goody, now my DH who is 51 can sit in 2 foot of water & play in the sand!!!!! :sad2:

[jade1]

[QUOTE=jade1;16989379]
jade1, What???:confused3

BroganMc, We were just informed my a manager at BC that they now have a beach wheelchair for the zero entry pool! Oh goody, now my DH who is 51 can sit in 2 foot of water & play in the sand!!!!! :sad2:

Yea thats a valid point, with my CP nephew it was awesome though.:thumbsup2

[Snow Shoe]

I would love to have a DVC at CR. This was the very first resort on property we stayed at, and loved it. To this day, our oldest son and youngest daugther prefeer staying there to any where else on Disney property. Yep, the monorail has a definate attration to it.

[Figment56]

JWG-we did Segways last year-they are great! I would love to have one to use while at WDW!:banana:

[JWG]

JWG-we did Segways last year-they are great! I would love to have one to use while at WDW!:banana:

My parents were able to use them on their Disney Cruise a few years back. We've yet to run into them anywhere to try :sad1:

If you could rent these at the Boardwalk/Beach Club and go around those resorts, that would be great. We like the restaurants at the BW and the scoop shop over at BC. We've done the bike rental before.

[BroganMc]

If you could rent these at the Boardwalk/Beach Club and go around those resorts, that would be great. We like the restaurants at the BW and the scoop shop over at BC. We've done the bike rental before.


As someone who uses a power wheelchair daily, I dread the general public getting their hands on Segway rentals. Just look how badly they drive rented ECVs and those only go at half the speed.

Segways look like fun, as is a power chair, but it takes more skill than you think to drive one in pedestrian traffic. That's why they aren't allowed in Epcot except by trained employees (runners) and through a morning tour when the Nations are closed to foot traffic.